Channel
@TRUDC00lkiddBlog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004491521555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TRUDC00lkiddBlog |
| Description | Канал НЕ привязан к каким либо сеткам! |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 2 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TRUDC00lkiddBlog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 17 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 17 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 408 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 3 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[◈] - Н3 з4м3ч4л р4ньш3, к4к звёзды с1яют н4 н3б3. 0тл1чн03 з4нят13 - см0тр3ть н4 звёзды, чт0бы 0твл3чься 0т 0ч3р3дных пл0х1х прят0к. Звёзды 0ч3нь кр4с1вы3, ч3стн0. Дум4ю, н4шёл ч3м с3бя м0жн0 з4нять н0чью, 3сл1 н3 х0ч3тся к4к-т0 сп4ть 1л1 впр1нц1п3 0тдых4ть.
💘1
[🌳16+😠] 🤩 . . .🤩ehehe. . 🤩i my Victim! ^_^ MP. The cultists disclaimer
#вп
🎀͟ ЛЮБ͜ИШЬ ПР3፝֟ТТИ ПРИ⃜НЦЕС͡С??? а так же ЛЮ︩︪БИШЬ ЛАР꯭꯭۫۫ПИТ፝֟Ь ?!? ͜💞゙⃞ ♡゙̼ х0ТЕִྀིЛ Б͡Ы ПОСМ͜0ТРЕТ፝֟Ь З͡А пр፝֟3т𝆋ти лар͜пне⃕сс ,, к0т0рая ... 💖 𝇃 ᛝ๋᤻ ៸៸ ЧАСТ0 0РЁТ НА БЛУДУДА ?!? ゙⃞𝆹𝅥᷒ᰰؚܑ᪾ ࣯࣯۫ « оо даа пожалуйста!! 🥺🩷🩷 » .✿᳝ۙؗᰰᩧؕ᷼ Т0 ЗА͜Х0゙⃞ДИִྀི В М፝֟0Й БЛ0Г 💘
#вп
#вп
ּׅۤ᪲⏝۟ 𝙍𝘼𝘼𝘼𝐴𝘼𝘼𝐴𝐴𝙃𝙃𝙃𝐻𝐻𝐻𝙃𝙃𝙃 !!!!!!!!!! ֵ ៶៶ ᩠᮫✿ິᮢ ִ 𝆺𝅥︩᷒ั⃪ִࣲ𐇽𝆹𝅥 𐇽ТЕБЯ ЗАЕБАЛА ПРЕТТИ ПТИНЦЕСС??? 𝓯𝓯 ࣭ ۫ ㅤ ⵿ ㅤ࣮ ㅤׄ дааа!!! ЛИБО ЖЕ..... ⃪𐇽ׄ᠀ּ۪ ࣲ࣮ۜ 𓏻ׅᩬТЕБЕ ИНТЕРЕСЕН БЛОГ ГОЛУБОГО и тупого ЛАРП ШКОЛЬНИКА С ОСАНКОЙ ХУЖЕ ЧЕМ У ТЕБЯ??!!??!!!ㅤ᷼ᰮֵㅤ͝ ּ ᛝ᪲᪼͜ КОНЕШНО!!! ⸝⸝ ⏝︶ 𝓦𝙚𝙡𝓬𝙤𝗆𝖾 𝖳𝖮... ㅤׄㅤְ ⃓ַֿ ͜͝ㅤ МОЙ БЛОГ!!!! ୧ۢ֩ᰰ 𝃚᮫࿙⃛࿚𝆋⃛࿙⃛࿚᜔⃛࿙⃛ ࿚⃛ ㅤㅤ ꒰ۢ͝ ТУТ Я ПОЩУ О ТОМ КАК НЕНАВИЖУ ЛАРП ПТИЧЬЮ ПРИН…
#вп
был перезапуск... 👻🌟🤩🤩🌟👻👻🍉nd in the end. . . 🌟🏝nly emptiness remains . 🤩🤩🤩 👻⚗️отите блог, где Ноли — это оригинальный миф? 🎀 🥛ечтаете поговорить с самим божеством Пустоты? 🔝 👻⚗️отите повлиять на развитие АУ? 🦷 🤍🤍🤍 Добро пожаловать в блог 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻Мифа Ноли 🎀 👻👻👻📝 🐣avigation . . 🔵
[◈] - Зн4ч1т ты пл0х0 скрыв4лся! П0р0й уч4стн1к4м н3 н4д0 д4в4ть ш4нс4, п0эт0му лучш3 3щё и ум3ть скрыв4ться!
[◈] - Н0чью? В т4к03 вр3мя 0бычн0 0н1 м0гут 0тдых4ть т0ж3, т4к чт0 эт0 вп0лн3 1д34льн03 вр3мя! У н1х буд3т вр3мя спрят4ться, 3сл1 0н1 м3ня ув1дят!
[◈] - Сп0к0йн4я н0чь.. М0ж3т быть. :) Л1чн0 я пр3дп0чту 0тд0хнуть в т4к03 п0здн33 вр3мя, а м0ж3т, я п0м3няю св0ё мн3н13... 0н1 т0чн0 н3 будут 0ж1д4ть вн3з4пных прят0к! Х0тя вр3мя п0к4ж3т, п0м3няю я св0ё мн3н13, 1л1 ж3 н3т.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TRUDC00lkiddBlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 297,316 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cool C00lkidd's blog!” (@TRUDC00lkiddBlog), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TRUDC00lkiddBlog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.