Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TROY CALL

@TROYCALL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,947subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001535667078
TypeChannel
Username@TROYCALL
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TROYCALL

Growth

1,9471,9891,9686 August 2026 — 1,989 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,989 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,982 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,947 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,941–1,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:511,947-35
7 Aug 2026, 18:081,982-7
6 Aug 2026, 20:151,989no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:061,989first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.6%
avg views ÷ 1,947 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 January 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,200
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

alltoscan: ATS - Successful retest of the base - Excellent volume - Logical targets 0.1 0.13 0.16 And it is the most important area, as breaking through it will make the coin shine 0.24 0.4 Stop: Close of daily candle below 0.0636 ‼️ On August 15, WATS Wallet’s decision to start using ATS as the gas fee across all networks will be the biggest factor driving the price increase. 👉 Buy link: ✅ Buy on MEXC ✅ Buy on Ga

17 May 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

RWA ( Real World Assets ) 🎨 I’d like to introduce you to a new project in the RWA (Real World Assets) sector that’s definitely worth your attention. ↗️ RWA Inc. is building infrastructure to tokenize real-world assets such as real estate, equity, and other financial instruments, making them accessible on-chain. The platform combines tokenization, a launchpad, and a marketplace, allowing users to invest in tradition

26 Mar 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$AFK on BASE 🔥🚀 Chart looking very bullish and ready to go parabolic at any moment. Team have been working harder to send this and I strongly believe if we break this resistance then we'll go parabolic. Listed in MEXC EXCHANGE AND DEX already, many more stuffs will unfold very soon. Market Opportunity WandrLust sits at the intersection of a $7.4 trillion global market spanning travel, outdoor recreation, wellnes

25 Mar 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Project Details: $AFK is built on Base. Fast, low-cost onchain infrastructure for the WandrLust app infrastructure to revolutionise the travel, hospitality and wellness industries using Agentic AI and Web3 incentives. Market Opportunity WandrLust sits at the intersection of a $7.4 trillion global market spanning travel, outdoor recreation, wellness, and the creator economy. $AFK is the incentive mechanism and toke

9 Feb 2026, 16:53 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$MSVP is officially trading on BingX Spot. First CEX listing ✅ • Trending on DEXs for days • Strong RWA narrative on BSC • Increasing spot accumulation • More listings expected I’ve also seen multiple traders openly say they’re accumulating spot, especially because RWA is shaping up to be one of the next major themes this cycle. On top of that, the team is still running a mega airdrop + BingX campaign, which usual

6 Feb 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,580 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Solana Bags - $BAG Secure the bag CA: 7k74YrjdUY6EaATMUXQ57HjUURm8V9SFYksfa6prpump Introduction Solana Bags is a fashion project using crypto to create and ship real products. We’re aiming to build a real brand not just a token. Something tangible for the people behind it. You’ll see everything as it happens: design changes, AI iterations, prototypes, and proof when production actually starts. No staged update

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TROYCALL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 728,752 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TROY CALL” (@TROYCALL), 1,947 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TROYCALL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.