Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @.. 𝒻lowe͟r͟y͟ -kun (˵◝ ⩊ ◜˵マ

Channel

@.. 𝒻lowe͟r͟y͟ -kun (˵◝ ⩊ ◜˵マ

@TLSN_FLOWERY

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003758128025
TypeChannel
Username@TLSN_FLOWERY
DescriptionFlowers!! Flowers!! supp [🐇] Itsumiheart he>it
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 October 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/TLSN_FLOWERY

Growth

186 Oct 2026, 11:47 — 18 subscribers6 Oct 2026, 12:22 — 18 subscribers6 Oct 2026, 11:476 Oct 2026, 12:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 12:2218no change
6 Oct 2026, 11:4718first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
181.9%
avg views ÷ 18 subscribers
Avg views / post
32.8
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held20 (31 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total393
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Oct 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
1
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1s
Average length
1s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘1680.0%
🙏315.0%
🍓15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 6 October 2026

Voiceline: 🔤o home. 🌰...🌼...🤩.. (¬`‸´¬).💛💛💛 📎 🔹ижу тебе очень нравится играть дурачка. Я думал это моя роль, сегодня что, день наоборот ? ? Хахахацветокхаха. Ты у нас умный, Рали, мог бы и не писать такие вещи в свой блог. ~ Но если сегодня день рассказов секретов, ты тоже выглядел не особо счастливым. Даже . . подавлено. Как бы ты не пытался скрыть информацию, правда всегда утичет. :) Но, на твое сожаление, я чув…

🍓1💘1

28 Sept 2026, 15:43 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 6 October 2026

Voiceline: 🔤t's me, Flowery! 🌰...🌼...🤩.. (¬`‸´¬).🤩🤩🤩 📎 🔹се мы уже устали от того, что ничего интересного не происходит. По крайней мере я – я! И я даже от скуки начал чертить план деревянных домов. Я не прирождённый чертёжник, или как их там, но в любом случае я видел парочку таких в Кастл тауне, поэтому принял к сведению. Хахахацветыхахаха. Они никогда не узнают кто украл у них идею чертежей! Человеки всегда воруют…

💘2

22 Sept 2026, 19:44 UTC34 views2 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Video

Voiceline: 🔤'm falling! 🌰...🌼...🤩.. (˶˃ᆺ˂˶)🤩🤩🤩 📎 🔹е желаю лгать, чувствую себя не очень хорошо. Возможно простудился, но в целом, вам не о чем переживать! :) Главное чтобы у вас все было хорошо. Дела в цветочном зале происходят хорошо, даже прекрасно. Новое блюдо Грин.. Выглядит очень красиво. Я так ими горжусь. Аква нашла новый нож, она такая молодчина! Правда, я все еще не очень понимаю откуда она его взяла. 😅 Но…

💘2

14 Sept 2026, 17:52 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 6 October 2026

Voiceline: — 🌰...🌼...🤩.. (¬`‸´¬).🤩🤩🤩 📎 🔹риветик. Я сделал новую укладку сегодня 👀 Мне нравится. Впервые придумал что-то годное, учитывая черные корни волос, а то почти никто их не видит. А мне они нравятся! Создают некий... Даже не знаю. Более яркий стиль, что ли. Можно использовать больше черного в одежде. О, и говоря о одежде.. Я работаю над кое чем, хехе. В скором времени вам покажу. На неделе. :):):) По-моему эт…

💘3

11 Sept 2026, 16:20 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 6 October 2026

Ральзею удалили блог земля ему пузом 🌼

🙏1

11 Sept 2026, 16:11 UTC49 views2 reactionsread 6 October 2026

Voiceline: 🔤eh, that's my jarona. 🌰...🌼...🤩.. (¬`‸´¬).🤩🤩🤩 📎 🔹обрый вечер! Или ночь! У кого как. Я пытался готовить, хотя получалось у меня так себе. При его присутствии я мог делать всё, а без его присутствия я даже в этом смысла не вижу. Да и чувствую себя хуже. Солнышка все меньше, все меньше, все меньше с каждым днём. Но хотя бы не на улице. Цветы гниют в это время суток там еще чаще. И ведь не факт что эта зима…

💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TLSN_FLOWERY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@.. 𝒻lowe͟r͟y͟ -kun (˵◝ ⩊ ◜˵マ” (@TLSN_FLOWERY), 18 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TLSN_FLOWERY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.