Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 杭州探花楼狼友出击报告区

Channel

杭州探花楼狼友出击报告区

@THbaogao1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

10,450subscribers

+3,407 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002642201510
TypeChannel
Username@THbaogao1
Descriptionhttps://t.me/hz5hz 聊天交流群 新探花认证榜单: @THYS89 探花认证老师榜: @TH2398 新人榜单: @THxr11 活动发布: @THL911 探花视频频道: @tanhuaTV888 报告区: @THbaogao1 #杭州 #探花 #修车 #楼风
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/THbaogao1

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,03610,7818,908.59 August 2026 — 7,043 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,043 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,036 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,090 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,181 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,260 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,401 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,514 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,721 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,799 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,003 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,176 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,282 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,468 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,862 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,472 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,994 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,309 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,372 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,519 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,628 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,626 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,746 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,756 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,728 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,759 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,781 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,760 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,752 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,740 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,717 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,718 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,709 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,700 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,708 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,701 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,674 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,649 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,620 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,596 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,510 subscribers10 November 2026 — 10,494 subscribers11 November 2026 — 10,450 subscribers10,4509 August 202611 November 2026
43 measurements spanning 94 days, net +3,407. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,474–11,343 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 23:0010,450-44
10 Nov 2026, 04:1010,494-16
8 Nov 2026, 17:5710,510-86
7 Nov 2026, 08:4110,596-24
6 Nov 2026, 06:0710,620-29
5 Nov 2026, 05:4910,649-25
4 Nov 2026, 06:2610,674-27
3 Nov 2026, 02:5910,701-7
2 Nov 2026, 05:1010,708+8
1 Nov 2026, 07:5110,700-9
31 Oct 2026, 11:1410,709-9
30 Oct 2026, 08:4610,718+1
29 Oct 2026, 07:0510,717-23
28 Oct 2026, 04:1610,740-12
27 Oct 2026, 00:5010,752-8
26 Oct 2026, 00:0610,760-21
25 Oct 2026, 00:1610,781+22
23 Oct 2026, 21:2810,759+31
22 Oct 2026, 22:1510,728-28
21 Oct 2026, 17:2810,756first reading

Engagement

183 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.16%
avg views ÷ 10,450 subscribers
Avg views / post
121
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.803%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 183 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held183 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total11,506
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈197
Videos
≈3
Links
≈4,870

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 183 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 183 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 95 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC45 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:潇潇晴吃不胖 【探花留名】:karoyaka 【人照打分】:10 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:8 【态度打分】:9 【环境打分】:8 【综合评分】:8.8 【体验详细】:约了p,总的来说,老师身材真的顶,喜欢气质御姐的必冲。一见面就被老师惊艳到了,一身长裙很是性感。腰也是非常细,搂着特别舒服,虽然我是第一次来,但聊得很融洽,女友感拉满。前戏老师非常配合,而且口得也很认真完全没有齿感。插入的一瞬间特别温暖,后面各种动作也是想当配合,大战三百回合随即发射,可能和老师前戏太长,做完时间有点超出,但老师也没有催,态度超好。另外补充一点是潇潇晴老师的课室布置也非常周到,环境很好, 妹妹很敏感一直嗲嗲的叫,还会抱住你,让人感觉很有女友味,下面也很紧之后换了后面和上面后还是坚持不住发射了。非常值得冲,态度和颜值都是满满的,值得回锅 杭州探花楼已认证老师…

14 Nov 2026, 07:14 UTC22 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:甜甜妹 【探花留名】:六便士 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:9 【态度打分】:9 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:9 【体验详细】:新来的妹妹,位置在拱墅区,小区环境不错很好找。 遥控进门,颜值几乎和照片无差,小小的一只。但身材很好,皮肤很好。 性格很腼腆,本来以为服务不会很好,出乎意外妹妹态度是真的好,很认真,服务也不错。只是性格腼腆 让妹子先上,吞入几把,上下摩擦。屌感可以,紧度正常,水量充足。干的认真,大蟒蛇管饱。 翻身压上,正面传教士插入。肉肉的妹子,操感可以。后入大屁股,也是弹性十足。 总得来说非常不错,结合价格,性价比拉满。 综合评价: 9.8分,好评。 嫩妹颜值,苗条身材,屁股很大。干炮配合,姿势听话。 强烈推荐,性价比妹子。喜欢嫩妹的兄弟,无脑可冲。 杭州探花楼已认证老师榜

14 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC17 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:沫沫 【探花留名】:黄飞红 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:9.5 【态度打分】:9.5 【环境打分】:9.5 【综合评分】:9.3 【体验详细】:我也算是沫沫老师的常客了,昨天就约了老师今天下午的课,到了下午跟老师确定好时间就过去了,老师回消息非常快,基本没有超过2个小时不回复的,看到就马上回复,这点体验发财棒,老师见面就是亲亲抱抱,关心我今天冷不冷,毕竟比较熟了,然后坐沙发上脱鞋,老师直接坐我大腿上,非常诱惑,对我揉揉捏捏,然后亲热了一会就让我去洗澡,洗完澡老师直接抱着我啃了起来,啃完嘴子我给老师吃葡萄,一通下来硬的不行,没让老师69了,直接让老师女上榨精,奈何这次二弟不给力,123出货,本还想再来后入出来,出货之后老师也没催我,因为我后面没排人,去的比较早,跟老师在床上抱着躺了一会,总得来说,这个老师服务非常棒,下面水多…

14 Nov 2026, 07:11 UTC21 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:小青梅 【探花留名】:Rodney 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:8 【服务打分】:9 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:9 【体验详细】:老师位置很好找,课室环境很温馨,房间香香的,一看老师课室就是一个很懂生活品味的人,一进门老师就对着我笑,很温柔,情绪价值很足,洗完澡来个水中萧吹得特别舒服,老师服务很给力,穿一套秘书服很有诱惑力,各种姿势给我吹箫,美美地,然后带上小雨伞上下摇,途中变化各种姿势,整体体验感很好 杭州探花楼已认证老师榜

14 Nov 2026, 05:56 UTC32 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:汤圆 【探花留名】:EAS 【人照打分】:7 【身材打分】:7 【服务打分】:6 【态度打分】:8 【环境打分】:6 【综合评分】:6.8 【体验详细】:看到新的工兵,看照片是个少妇,直接约了,是个公寓楼,有点不太放心,但还是上去了,开门见到老师真人,比照片显大,胸部也明显下垂,可来都来了,就脱衣洗澡,全程老师帮忙洗,来到床上后,发现老师吸烟,服务的时候,也能明显闻到味道,就没怎么口了,直接带套开干,做爱反馈真实,叫声还不错,水还是多的,屁股也比较大,出货后冲个澡走人 杭州探花楼已认证老师榜

13 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC91 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:莹莹 【探花留名】:拉布布 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:8 【服务打分】:10 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:10 【综合评分】:9.4 【体验详细】:人很热情,服务态度也很好,做服务不催钟,本人比照片更好看,甜美型的妹子,娇娇欲滴的感觉,讲话说起话来也很温柔,大家值得来尝试一下,很多情趣内衣,口活很好,在浴室就给我来了一次水中萧,口暴了一次,而且胸部摸上去也很舒服,胸部挺拔柔软,胸部货真价实的36C,洗完澡后在沙发,床上,给我乳胶,波推,各种姿势大战三百回合,她住的房间十分整洁干净,这次体验的感觉极佳,服务真的是做的一流,来了之后就会让你欲仙欲死流连忘返,有想法的大哥都可以来体验一下,我刚体验完,确实不错,而且人长的很漂亮特别有气质。 杭州探花楼已认证老师榜

13 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC72 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:安沐瑶 【探花留名】:拉布布 【人照打分】:10 【身材打分】:10 【服务打分】:10 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:8 【综合评分】:9.6 【体验详细】:课表有的都有。十分配合,很给力。颜值系。在tg上徘徊许久,关注良久,决定出击。 遥控上门,抬眼是一个美丽俏佳人,清纯校园美女面容,人照一致。一袭长裙,亭亭玉立,如出水芙蓉。迅速交完水费,洗完澡, 在老师活舌头的挑逗下,不一会就梆硬,先是趴在飘窗上,抱着后入美女,有种偷情的快感。于是立马带帽抬腿后入,干了一会然后趴在桌上后入。期间老师突然放声大叫,刺激的差点射了。 接着回到床上,在老师的指导和配合下,我尝试了各种不同姿势。最后在二人的共同努力下,各自都达到了高潮 杭州探花楼已认证老师榜

13 Nov 2026, 14:55 UTC51 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:沫沫 【探花留名】:905m 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:9.5 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:9.5 【综合评分】:9.4 【体验详细】:点了拼团,200积分,到了遥控上楼,一进门老师就上来拥抱,很像女友见面的感觉,接着去洗澡,老师递过来漱口水(准备舌吻+69),洗完进房间老师让躺下,上来蹭了一会儿果断69式,不得不说老师的小穴是真的可以,口紧水多,老师受不了了,骑上来逼推了一会儿,差点就滑进去了,果断带套,老师一直喊逼好痒,搞得我也十分兴奋,女上位老师频率相当快,差点就交枪了,换后入式对着镜子猛干,最后传教士缴枪了,十分棒的体验,下次还会二刷! 杭州探花楼已认证老师榜

13 Nov 2026, 14:54 UTC45 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:小月月 【探花留名】:❤͜͡⋆ͥ⋆ͣ⋆ͫ⍣⃟🆂🇭🅰️kir᚛S𝖍ek𝖍 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:9 【态度打分】:9 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:9 【体验详细】: 开门第一眼看见月月老师就沦陷了,是我喜欢的类型,老师的皮肤白皙,身材苗条,前凸后翘。没想到比照片看去更灵动,细枝硕果芙蓉绣面仙女下凡。闲聊几句表达赞美后准备共浴,美乳翘臀直接令我二弟冲涨,洗的时候闻着头发一股飘香。然后转到水磨床上互相爱抚,老师的服务前戏真的很陶醉,深喉太绝了,爽到起飞的很享受,我也没忍住品尝了老师的妹妹,确实味道甜甜的,像是在吃小蛋糕。进入正戏后互换了两波攻防位又试了试抱起来做,第一次试抱着的体位加上有点累就没动几下,最后还是按到床上,不过老师还用了一字马超刺激的,吻着大长腿冲击结束战斗。老师住的屋子很宽敞明亮,做起来也有跟女友般亲热…

13 Nov 2026, 14:52 UTC42 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-13 【老师艺名】:寒寒 【探花留名】:MuskB岸 【人照打分】:8 【身材打分】:8 【服务打分】:10 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:9 【体验详细】:老师在石桥这边应该回迁房,应该是新小区。小区环境和课室环境都整洁,老规矩到小区门口联系确认楼栋电梯到上一层楼再走楼梯下楼,安全意识可以,老师隔壁全是快递差点走错。到了课室天冷了老师没有厚衣服开了热空调,老师安排衣服放沙发上迅速脱衣冲洗,可惜没有陪浴,老师帮忙擦干,到床上等老师服务。老师主动裸上半身开始服务,先B面再A面,老师做的很仔细,半个小时不到口中交货。做完跟老师聊了一会,老师不抽烟没,喜欢少妇的LY可以冲 杭州探花楼已认证老师榜

13 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC42 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-12 【老师艺名】:甜甜妹 【探花留名】:MichaelRodgers 【人照打分】:8 【身材打分】:8 【服务打分】:7 【态度打分】:7 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:7.8 【体验详细】:ls位置不错,需要扫码上楼比较安全。房间里也提早开了空调很暖和,不过没有准备水比较可惜,另外ls这边没有衣服,有需要的兄弟需要提前和ls说。 速度洗澡后就开始,ls感觉技术比较稚嫩,简单69一会儿就开始。不得不说ls的水很多,而且会有一点点压抑自己的叫声,在我看来很色气,最后后入忍不住出来了,总结来说还算不错。 不过ls全程没怎么说话也没怎么笑,在我看来有一点点减分,希望ls以后能稍微开朗一点,多笑笑,不然会让来的人感觉怪怪的。 杭州探花楼已认证老师榜

13 Nov 2026, 14:24 UTC46 viewsread 14 November 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-11-12 【老师艺名】:暖暖抓龙筋 【探花留名】:叉叉肉 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:9 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:9.2 【体验详细】: 暖暖老师老师本人比照片漂亮,笑容很治愈,笑起来有点坏女人的感觉,皮肤很健康。环境很好,还有氛围灯,不是黑漆漆那种啥也看不清,bgm也好评,配上老师的丝袜情趣穿搭,情欲拉满。开始先做道具放松和面部护理头疗,搞得人酥酥痒痒的,然后是后背臀部放松按摩,一点不敷衍,按的很舒服,再是前列腺放松和三角区保养初体验,这时候已经快忍不住想要了,然后老师给做的丝足,非常专业,足一会,抓一会龙筋,在足,当老师撕开脚底丝袜的时候就知道是专业的,再就是三起三落的抓龙筋,老师手法搓的人欲罢不能,最后面的高潮来了,前列腺高潮真的太神奇了,首先一点不疼,然后循序渐进,两头爽,老师手法实在是太厉害了,节奏感很强,爽…

Showing the 12 most recent of 183 posts we hold for @THbaogao1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @THbaogao1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“杭州探花楼狼友出击报告区” (@THbaogao1), 10,450 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/THbaogao1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.