Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π–’π—‹π—’π—‰π—π—ˆ π–­π–Ύπ—π—Œ

Channel

π–’π—‹π—’π—‰π—π—ˆ π–­π–Ύπ—π—Œ

@TGxCryptoNews

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

4,112subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001972455347
TypeChannel
Username@TGxCryptoNews
Created18 August 2023 β€” measured β€” dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TGxCryptoNews

Growth

4,1124,1514,131.57 August 2026 β€” 4,151 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 4,151 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 4,148 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 4,140 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 4,132 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 4,123 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 4,112 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 14 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,106–4,157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 20:384,112-11
18 Aug 2026, 08:424,123-9
15 Aug 2026, 15:064,132-8
11 Aug 2026, 17:264,140-8
8 Aug 2026, 07:314,148-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:004,151no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:514,151first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 18 August 2023 β€” the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
5.61%
avg views Γ· 4,112 subscribers
Avg views / post
231
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held16 (18 August 2023 – 24 July 2026)
Views total692
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀2638.8%
😁1725.4%
πŸ—Ώ710.4%
❀‍πŸ”₯34.48%
πŸŽ„34.48%
πŸ‘22.99%
πŸ”₯22.99%
😍22.99%
πŸŽ‰11.49%
πŸ‘11.49%
πŸ‘Ύ11.49%
πŸ’―11.49%
πŸ™11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2023 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC234 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Giving 4 free signal πŸ“‰πŸ“ˆ

❀3

17 Nov 2025, 18:35 UTCβ‰ˆ1,420 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hello guys I have where to make money I mean dollars if you need the update let me know

❀2

2 Aug 2025, 11:15 UTCβ‰ˆ2,120 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀3

10 Jun 2025, 14:21 UTCβ‰ˆ2,830 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Giveaway who is active 🎁?

😁17πŸ—Ώ7❀4❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸŽ„3πŸ”₯2😍2πŸŽ‰1

1 Jun 2025, 16:38 UTCβ‰ˆ3,220 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Micheal Saylor hints on accumulating more Bitcoin saying " Orange is my Preferred Color".

21 May 2025, 12:40 UTCβ‰ˆ3,930 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ANALYSIS: Robert Kiyosaki warns, "The Fed held an auction for US Bonds and no one showed up," signaling the start of hyperinflation and predicting soaring prices for gold, silver, and Bitcoin.

πŸ‘2

20 May 2025, 20:17 UTCβ‰ˆ3,340 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ethereum co-founder Jeffrey Wilcke transfers $262M in ETH to Kraken β€” but no need to panic Jeffrey Wilcke sent 105,736 ETH (worth $262 million) to Kraken, causing market speculation about a possible sell-off. However, eight new wallets later withdrew the same amount, suggesting it was just an internal transfer.

20 May 2025, 18:32 UTCβ‰ˆ2,660 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Justin Sun says he is a top holder of the $TRUMP token, which has earned him an invitation to a private dinner with President Trump.

20 May 2025, 18:12 UTCβ‰ˆ2,280 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

From hype to investigation: LIBRA token collapse puts Milei in hot water The Argentine president faces scrutiny as the court opens his bank accounts in search of links to the scam.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @TGxCryptoNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MR CHRISS ODDS
@mrchrissodds Β· 58,419
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 24 here β€” alongside 23 others β€” read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ–’π—‹π—’π—‰π—π—ˆ π–­π–Ύπ—π—Œβ€ (@TGxCryptoNews), 4,112 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGxCryptoNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.