8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,587–2,636 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 17:44
2,593
-8
24 Aug 2026, 16:53
2,601
-8
20 Aug 2026, 18:38
2,609
-6
17 Aug 2026, 13:12
2,615
-5
14 Aug 2026, 08:25
2,620
-5
10 Aug 2026, 18:27
2,625
-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:03
2,630
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:50
2,630
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 2,593 subscribers
Avg views / post
524
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
17 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
8,909
Reactions total
283
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
283 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
114
40.3%
💩
35
12.4%
😁
32
11.3%
😢
24
8.48%
🗿
20
7.07%
👎
14
4.95%
🔥
14
4.95%
🤡
13
4.59%
👍
12
4.24%
💊
3
1.06%
😐
2
0.707%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 283reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Проблемы обретают силу благодаря нашему вниманию
Чем чаще мы обсуждаем свои трудности, тем больше простора даём им для роста. Сами того не замечая, мы питаем их своими мыслями, разговорами и страхами.
Наш мозг всегда увеличивает значимость того, на чём мы концентрируемся. Если постоянно жаловаться на преграды, жизнь щедро подкинет новых. Начинаем отмечать позитив — замечаем, как хорошего становится больше.
Вместо …
У каждого из нас есть свои недостатки.
Кто-то слишком шумно ест, кто-то постоянно забывает про мусор, а кто-то попросту не замечает по взгляду, что ты злишься, обижена или уже устала.
Но дело вовсе не в том, чтобы встретить совершенство. Главное — это отношение к тебе.
Все имеет значение: легко ли тебе с этим человеком, хочется ли быть рядом, а не просто мириться с его присутствием. Когда тебя действительно уважают…
Кошачья система классификации психических расстройств
1. Острый психоз — вы заводите разговор с кошкой.
2. Острый галлюцинаторный психоз — вы ведете беседу с кошкой, которой на самом деле нет.
3. Паранойя — вас пугает мысль нечаянно выдать секрет при кошке.
🧐 Наблюдения снова и снова доказывают: когда вокруг царит порядок, наш разум обретает ощущение защищённости и комфорта.
Порой достаточно просто привести в порядок одно небольшое место — и тревога уходит, становясь тише. Это похоже на быструю медитацию, только не требуется коврик и правильное дыхание.
С наступлением зимы контраст ощущается сильнее: информации все больше, шум повседневности нарастает, а сил будто ста…
Упражнение «Алфавит»
Сегодня хочу поделиться с вами действительно простым и эффективным способом поддерживать ясность ума и предотвращать деменцию. Это упражнение не только заряжает энергией мозг, но и развивает связи между полушариями.
Как это работает?
Рядом с каждой буквой вы найдете обозначение:
Л — поднять левую руку
П — поднять правую руку
О — поднять обе руки
Двигайтесь по алфавиту построчно: называете всл…
☺️Что необходимо каждому мужчине:
1. Обязательно похвалить, если еда получилась вкусной.
2. Есть молча, если вдруг не понравилось.
Вот и всё — вы на высоте!
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TGamesWorld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лаборатория сознания” (@TGamesWorld), 2,593 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGamesWorld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
