Мысли по NFT-подаркам и NFT-стикерам. Без рекламы и спама.
Лучшие сервисы/боты/гайды в закрепе.
Все конкретные личные вопросы в лс канала. Все общие простые — в чат.
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,476–7,509 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 10:17
7,480
-17
8 Aug 2026, 01:14
7,497
-8
7 Aug 2026, 16:16
7,505
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.1%
avg views ÷ 7,480 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.215%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
20 (18 March 2026 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
2,330
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
649
Videos
118
Links
540
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
415 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
206
49.6%
👍
83
20.0%
🔥
68
16.4%
💩
36
8.67%
😁
6
1.45%
😐
5
1.20%
👌
4
0.964%
👎
2
0.482%
🤔
2
0.482%
👏
1
0.241%
😭
1
0.241%
🤣
1
0.241%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 415reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TG_Enot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 March 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❓По ходу мтонги созревает вопрос: «А для чего это всё?». Безусловно, каждый апдейт где-то улучшил экосистему. Но зачем, если от этого ничего не меняется? Вернемся к слогану MTONGA — сделать тон снова великим. Значит, сразу после 7 шага тон, условно, будет великим. Но с подобными архитектурными улучшениями ничего глобально не изменится. Соответственно, или ждем крутых штук, или слоган пиздеж.
🫂Кмк, главное, что должн…
🖐Понемногу возвращаюсь, из тг инфополя и не уходил. Ждал хоть какой-то намек на интересные новости. Вероятно, формат канала скорректируется в полулайф: будет больше мелких заметок, идей и мыслей. Глобальных новостей для полноценных постов нет на постоянной основе. Для меня это не очень привычно, но я попробую 🙈
Комиссия 2%
Когда роксман впервые намекнул, что скоро у всех будет комиссия на подарки, в душе появилась надежда, что это один из шагов MTONGA. Тг будет лутать не только с передач и собственного маркета, а со всех продаж и пускать в пуш рынка. Даже подумал, что в отложенном посте «Как оживить подарки» придется убрать пункт про взимание процента с каждой продажи. Но, видимо, пункт остается.
🖼Portals, 🧼Mrkt и 🏬GetGem…
🖼Portals — стейкинг, 0% комиссия, лудка
У порталыча сейчас идет MGGA, аля мтонга для гифтов.
🛍0% комиссия. Нигде не сказано, что это навсегда, как у Mrkt, но явно не на неделю. Приятно.
💰Стейкинг. То, из-за чего и пишу этот пост. Жирнейшая фича, которой не хватало от маркета. В Rolls было неплохо, но сейчас у них доп. условия стейкинга, и выгода улетучилась.
Так вот, порталс завез стейкинг себе. Сейчас APR ~100%, …
💎 Растем
Вчера курс тона был ~$1.7, и казалось, что растем на новости про TF. Но с текущим курсом $2.3 Паша явно задумал что-то интереснее. Вообще, как говорят опытные дяденьки, сначала разгоняются токены, и потом, когда люди в эйфории с заработали много легких денег, идет затар картиночками. А учитывая крайне высокую вероятность того, что один из шагов мтонга будет для нфтшек, рост может быть очень скорым и очень б…
🤠MTONGA 3 шаг: зачистка
Слияние Telegram и TON Foundation. Теперь TF под полным контролем Дурова (кто не знал, это разные организации. Были.)
📱 TON Foundation отвечал за медийку, соцсети итп. Славились как помойка. Работники не шарят в крипте; зп получают за посты гм, гн; все по родству и знакомству. Это если максимально ласково и не углубляться. Они паразитировали в блокчейне. Но теперь все в руках нашего покровит…
🛒 Снайпер бот для стикерпада
PadSniper сейчас топ-1 по быстроте для автоматизированной покупки стикеров из пада. Разраб связан с SP и в целом варится в стикерах и софте (он же создатель 🙏Laffka).
🤖Только юзеры бота забирают самые сочные и дешевые ~25% саплая, перепродавая в стабильные 3X-5X от вложенного. Через бота покупка проходит напрямую без подтверждения транзы. Быстрее бота взять просто невозможно. Например, …
🔥 Запуск стикерпада
Подробности, что это и как работает есть в посте или оф. статье.
🐶 Бедный пад кодили и перекодивали несколько месяцев. В день запуска что-то пошло не так и решили не переносить в сотый раз и запустить ночью.
😮 И началось: всевозможные пикчи, мемы, стикеры, ии полетели на сейл. Меня разрывает, когда вижу в серьезном интерфейсе SP просто отбитые фотки как на скрине ахахахахаха. Подобные паки, ест…
🍬Мысли по сторам стикеров, часть 2: Goodies
• Общение с комьюнити. Кролик за 2 тона дает доступ в общий Goodies-чат, который живее всех вместе взятых чатов холедров из SP. + взаимодействие в канале и с самими админами, анонсы и другие аспекты на на невероятном уровне в отличии от SP.
• Медийность. Направленность на новую "западную" аудиторию намного больше. Например, та же активность в X. Коллаборации с Dream works…
🖼Мысли по сторам стикеров, часть 1: Sticker Pack
Раз уж упомянул, что предпочитаю Sticker Pack, надо и обосновать. Но для баланса вселенной по Goodies будет такой же пост. Итак, тезисно про SP.
• Формальный подход во всем: от дизайна аппки, до выпуска постов и "общения" с комьюнити. На уровне подсознания есть ощущение «официальности» стора. Но в этом же и минус. Полное отсутствие взаимодействия напрягает.
• Это пе…
🎁Дуров про стикеры
Сегодня было приятное утро для стикер-комьюнити. Паша в X написал:
Then you're lucky — we'll be announcing improvements for stickers soon.
*Тогда вам повезло — скоро мы объявим об улучшениях для стикеров.*
😎В основном на этой новости отросли стикеры BAYC и Pudgy, что ожидаемо.
🎁Пост пишу чисто из-за того, что интересна реакция людей. По подарочным каналам пошла мини-тряска. Но временно утешаются…
Началось?
🪙 TON внедрил технологию Catchain 2.0, которая сделала транзакции в 6 раз быстрее. Шутки про настолько же ускоренное падение курса принимаются.
👨🦰 Но главное — про это сделал пост сам Дуров в своем канале. Подобного буллиша по тону от него давно не припомню. Сказал, что это 1 из 7 шагов, чтобы сделать TON снова великим. Следующий шаг — удешевить транзакции в 6 раз.
😋 Остается только догадываться, что ск…
❤10🔥6💩4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TG_Enot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 151,316 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TG_Enot named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@stickerspad_bot named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Enot | NFT-подарки, NFT-стикеры, TON” (@TG_Enot), 7,480 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TG_Enot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.