Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Друзья Tyler Durden

Channel

Друзья Tyler Durden

@TD3108

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

13,816subscribers

+9,404 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004299305238
TypeChannel
Username@TD3108
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TD3108

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

41.9 average views per post against 13,816 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.303%. Across the 12,354 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,016–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.57% and 18.6%, with a median of 9.30%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured39 of 39 published in the window (39 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,634
Mature posts only0.325% over 35 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,816 measured 25 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 12,354 channels · p10 2.29% · p25 4.57% · p50 9.30% · p75 18.6% · p90 34.1%
Position in cohort0.745th percentile · 1/30 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.209% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

3,81578,89041,352.57 August 2026 — 4,412 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,384 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,150 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,971 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,815 subscribers20 August 2026 — 78,890 subscribers21 August 2026 — 77,881 subscribers22 August 2026 — 68,204 subscribers24 August 2026 — 67,431 subscribers25 August 2026 — 65,004 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,480 subscribers27 August 2026 — 57,732 subscribers28 August 2026 — 57,367 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,783 subscribers30 August 2026 — 48,537 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,591 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,053 subscribers2 September 2026 — 33,008 subscribers4 September 2026 — 32,999 subscribers6 September 2026 — 31,754 subscribers9 September 2026 — 30,851 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,083 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,681 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,747 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,603 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,816 subscribers13,8167 August 202625 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 49 days, net +9,404. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 10:3813,816-11,787
17 Sept 2026, 05:1625,603-144
15 Sept 2026, 08:1625,747-3,934
13 Sept 2026, 16:2129,681-402
12 Sept 2026, 01:0130,083-768
9 Sept 2026, 19:1830,851-903
6 Sept 2026, 13:4131,754-1,245
4 Sept 2026, 01:1932,999-9
2 Sept 2026, 17:5733,008-45
1 Sept 2026, 14:1233,053-538
31 Aug 2026, 15:2433,591-14,946
30 Aug 2026, 18:4548,537-246
29 Aug 2026, 18:5448,783-8,584
28 Aug 2026, 19:2457,367-365
27 Aug 2026, 16:0957,732-2,748
26 Aug 2026, 17:5360,480-4,524
25 Aug 2026, 14:1865,004-2,427
24 Aug 2026, 16:0367,431-773
22 Aug 2026, 23:0968,204-9,677
21 Aug 2026, 11:5877,881first reading

Engagement

98 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.303%
avg views ÷ 13,816 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.9
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 98 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held98 (31 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total1,634
Reactions total384
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 06:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 57s
Average length
1m 39s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

956 reactions across 98 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29230.5%
🔥21022.0%
❤19220.1%
😁677.01%
💯565.86%
👏262.72%
❤‍🔥212.20%
🏆181.88%
🥰151.57%
😱111.15%
👀90.941%
🤔80.837%
👌70.732%
🐳50.523%
🤯50.523%
🕊40.418%
🤩40.418%
⚡30.314%
🤣20.209%
😎10.105%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 956 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,076
across the posts below
Posts paid on
47
of 98 we hold a reading for · 48%
Most on one post
1,000
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TD3108. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 98 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 05:21 UTC7 views8 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🪙 ИИ УЖЕ ГОТОВ ТРАТИТЬ ТВОИ ДЕНЬГИ ЗА ТЕБЯ... Сначала мы отдали алгоритмам внимание, потом выбор музыки, фильмов, новостей, маршрутов. Теперь ИИ готов выбирать за нас товары и сам за них платить. Удобно? Безусловно. Только однажды можно обнаружить, что ты уже почти ничего не выбираешь сам. Система победит не тогда, когда запретит тебе выбирать, а когда сделает выбор слишком утомительным. 🧠 Как думаете? - - - - - -…

❤3🔥3👍2

22 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC24 views7 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

😍Двери открыты. ATF на Toobit. Ждём обратный выкуп с прибыли Forex. Листинг, это вывеска, а деньги, это доказательство. 📣Теперь Forex должен заговорить деньгами. - - - - - #TylerDurden

👍4❤3

22 Sept 2026, 04:32 UTC28 views8 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

😍 Сегодня АTF выходит на Toobit. В 12:00 мск старт торгов. Без прогнозов! Листинг, это момент, когда рынок начинает говорить цифрами. 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 👍 Майним 🔥 Держим ⚡ Уже продали С 12:00 мск обещания заканчиваются. Начинаются цифры. 🔽🔼 - - - - - - #TylerDurden

👍6🔥2

19 Sept 2026, 14:57 UTC49 views7 reactionsread 23 September 2026

🔴 Уведомление! Друзья, с понедельника у меня не будет времени вести канал в связи с большой нагрузкой на работе. Не определился закрывать канал или пусть остаётся. Пока висит. Вам удачи! - - - - - - #TylerDurden

😱4❤2🔥1

19 Sept 2026, 03:19 UTC58 views11 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🐹 Весёлых выходных - - - - - #TylerDurden

😁7❤2👍1🔥1

18 Sept 2026, 13:08 UTC53 views5 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🔼 ATF. Вот теперь интересно. Toobit подтвердил скорый листинг ATF. Биржа прямо сейчас пишет: часть прибыли от торговли планируют направлять на покупку ATF с рынка. А это уже не фарм. Не раздача. Не красивые обещания. Это потенциальный реальный спрос на токен. На фоне миллиардов ATF в локе картина становится интереснее. Но без эйфории. Листинг, это дверь. Главный вопрос — пойдут ли через неё деньги. Наблюдаем. 👀 - -…

👍5

18 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC41 views9 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

О нас и многих других 😎

👍4😁3🔥2

18 Sept 2026, 05:10 UTC66 views21 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Разыграем 1000 звёзд! По 100 звёзд на 10 победителей! Нужно быть подписанным на @TD3108 и @TD3108Ch Окончание после набора 50 участников. Удачи!

🏆9❤6🔥6

17 Sept 2026, 06:42 UTC51 views5 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

⚙️ ATF. Начинается самое интересное. До сих пор всё было просто: фарм, накопление, продажа. Теперь появился VIP и лок токенов. Сам по себе VIP цену не создаёт, лок тоже. Цена появляется тогда, когда появляется причина покупать ATF, а не просто получать их бесплатно. Инфраструктуру команда строит, обещанные шаги постепенно делает. Теперь нужен главный элемент, это спрос. Смотрим дальше 👀 Как думаете, VIP станет нач…

❤3🔥2

17 Sept 2026, 05:12 UTC47 views6 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

💖 Tyler Durden vs Система В интернете воруют деньги, аккаунты, подарки... Теперь продают людей. Имя. Документы. Фото. История. Цифровой след. Готовая «личность» около $200. Мы так долго строили свою жизнь в интернете, что однажды обнаружили: теперь её можно купить без нас. А ты уверен, что в интернете ты всё ещё единственный? И если завтра появится второй «ты», как докажешь, что настоящий именно ты? 🪙 - - - - - - #…

👍5🤔1

16 Sept 2026, 18:44 UTC40 views8 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🧠 Мысли вслух Мы постоянно экономим время. Доставка. Такси. Быстрый интернет. Всё стало быстрее. Вот только свободного времени почему-то стало меньше. Кто-нибудь понял, на что мы его экономим? 👀 - - - - - - #TylerDurden

👍4🔥3😁1

15 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC41 views8 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

💖 Tyler Durden vs Система Пишет знакомый: Нафармил 13 миллионов. Теперь они стоят $0. Раньше я был миллионером. Теперь просто стал умнее. Иногда опыт, это единственное, что реально можно вывести из некоторых проектов. 😏 Как считаете? - - - - - #TylerDurden

👍5😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @TD3108. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@TD3108 edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Друзья Tyler Durden” (@TD3108), 13,816 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TD3108.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.