Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Царь Тунец 🐟

Channel

Царь Тунец 🐟

@TAPOCHKI_0009

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002259942376
TypeChannel
Username@TAPOCHKI_0009
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TAPOCHKI_0009

Growth

26282710 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 23:5528+2
11 Aug 2026, 08:4826no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:4526first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
79.8%
avg views ÷ 28 subscribers
Avg views / post
22.3
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
50.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held9 (27 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total201
Reactions total102
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 9 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52534561937576787691817.6%
custom 5253592004918540422109.80%
custom 5350518254169247792109.80%
custom 524455369292070267198.82%
custom 547463519834159936698.82%
custom 531205568816220675487.84%
custom 536410292219388950187.84%
custom 544090161466577027387.84%
custom 537535678018646424965.88%
custom 540262316961171990821.96%
custom 547188567624283472921.96%
❤‍🔥21.96%
🍓21.96%
custom 520851261659024114810.98%
custom 530774720030917472010.98%
custom 532830395316989137410.98%
custom 537528200051087282110.98%
custom 541118566365767592510.98%
custom 544512343866869392110.98%
custom 547212859100316270710.98%
1 further kind10.98%

Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 9 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TAPOCHKI_0009. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC11 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🍓1custom 52445536929207026711custom 52534561937576787691custom 52535920049185404221custom 53120556881622067541custom 53641029221938895011custom 54409016146657702731

10 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC11 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Меня тянет блевать от упоминания 24-25годов, но фоточки с любимымспасают ситуацию 💪💪 Хочу нарисовать пару любимых фотографий таких

custom 52535920049185404223❤‍🔥1🍓1custom 52445536929207026711custom 53120556881622067541custom 53505182541692477921custom 53641029221938895011custom 53753567801864642491

9 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC12 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

@gD11sm0Rphob1a Еще одна суперкрутая коллаба ❤‍🔥❤‍🔥

custom 52534561937576787693custom 54746351983415993663custom 53505182541692477922❤‍🔥1🕊1custom 52445536929207026711custom 52535920049185404221custom 53120556881622067541

8 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC12 views12 reactions6 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Какой-то слишком грустный получился 😱

custom 52534561937576787694custom 52445536929207026711custom 52535920049185404221custom 53120556881622067541custom 53505182541692477921custom 53641029221938895011custom 53753567801864642491custom 54409016146657702731

3 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC27 views9 reactions6 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Кошкомальчик🤍🤍🤍

custom 52534561937576787692custom 52445536929207026711custom 52535920049185404221custom 53120556881622067541custom 53641029221938895011custom 53753567801864642491custom 54409016146657702731custom 54746351983415993661

2 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC29 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

@ffDem0 Наверна пока последняя коллабаНОКАКАЯ 😍 С самым непревзойдённым, самым прекрасным богом мира!! Рисовать любимых с любимым самое крутое, таких комбо нет даже в маке 🎵🎵

custom 53505182541692477922custom 52445536929207026711custom 52534561937576787691custom 52535920049185404221custom 53120556881622067541custom 53641029221938895011custom 54409016146657702731custom 54746351983415993661

1 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC28 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

@Sunmot @Srlffxx777 царь поверил в себя 🐇🐇 Две из 4 коллаб уже готовы 👅

custom 52534561937576787695custom 52445536929207026711custom 52535920049185404221custom 53120556881622067541custom 53505182541692477921custom 53641029221938895011custom 53753567801864642491custom 54409016146657702731

30 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC31 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Маленькие вкусненькие малышочке 💬💬

custom 53505182541692477923custom 52445536929207026712custom 52534561937576787692custom 52535920049185404221custom 53120556881622067541custom 53641029221938895011custom 53753567801864642491custom 54409016146657702731

27 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC40 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вот так получше 😘

custom 54026231696117199082custom 54718856762428347292custom 52085126165902411481custom 53077472003091747201custom 53283039531698913741custom 53752820005108728211custom 54111856636576759251custom 54451234386686939211

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @TAPOCHKI_0009. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,454,516 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Царь Тунец 🐟” (@TAPOCHKI_0009), 28 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TAPOCHKI_0009.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.