Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -2,373. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,130–17,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 22:56
14,486
-29
9 Nov 2026, 23:09
14,515
-14
8 Nov 2026, 16:49
14,529
-31
7 Nov 2026, 13:49
14,560
-9
6 Nov 2026, 14:26
14,569
-25
5 Nov 2026, 12:01
14,594
-25
4 Nov 2026, 11:28
14,619
-18
3 Nov 2026, 10:44
14,637
-16
2 Nov 2026, 09:50
14,653
-18
1 Nov 2026, 11:17
14,671
-17
31 Oct 2026, 08:28
14,688
-15
30 Oct 2026, 08:16
14,703
-19
29 Oct 2026, 04:59
14,722
-25
28 Oct 2026, 01:15
14,747
-13
27 Oct 2026, 04:00
14,760
-10
26 Oct 2026, 05:59
14,770
-21
25 Oct 2026, 04:08
14,791
-19
24 Oct 2026, 01:56
14,810
-18
23 Oct 2026, 04:27
14,828
-35
22 Oct 2026, 01:50
14,863
first reading
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.02%
avg views ÷ 14,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
727
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 91 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
91 (2 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
28,335
Reactions total
410
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 20:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,580
Videos
≈1,130
Links
≈154
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 14m
Average length
1m 47s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,025 reactions across 89 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
879
85.8%
🫡
91
8.88%
👏
16
1.56%
🕊
12
1.17%
💯
7
0.683%
😍
7
0.683%
🙏
5
0.488%
🥰
5
0.488%
👍
2
0.195%
😭
1
0.098%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,025 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (5.13%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔰 برومو | تغطية الإعلام المركزي للزيارة الفاطمية في محافظة النجف الأشرف، حيث رصدت عدسة الإعلام أجواء الزيارة وحشود المعزين الوافدين لمواساة أمير المؤمنين (عليه السلام)، إلى جانب توثيق أبرز النشاطات والجهود الخدمية التي قدّمها موكب شهداء العقيلة ولواء كربلائيون الخدمي لخدمة المعزين وإحياء ذكرى شهادة الصديقة فاطمة الزهراء (عليها السلام).
#الإعلام_المركزي
🔰 حسينية شهداء العقيلة في النجف الأشرف تستقبل المعزين بذكرى شهادة السيدة فاطمة الزهراء (عليها السلام)
استقبلت حسينية شهداء العقيلة في النجف الأشرف جموع المعزين الوافدين من مختلف محافظات العراق، لتقديم العزاء والمواساة إلى أمير المؤمنين الإمام علي (عليه السلام)، بذكرى شهادة الصديقة الطاهرة فاطمة الزهراء (عليها السلام).
وأقامت الحسينية مجلس عزاء لاستذكار هذه الفاجعة الأليمة، إلى جانب توفير مختلف الخدمات اللازمة للمعزين…
🔰حركة النجباء:
إنّ الأخ المجاهد (أبو حسين الحميداوي) قدّم التضحيات الكبيرة في سبيل المقدسات وحماية الوطن، وله تاريخ مشرّف ونبيل، والعمل على استهدافه بهذه الأساليب غير مقبول وغير مبرر.
🔰 باشر لواء كربلائيون الخدمي وموكب شهداء العقيلة في النجف الأشرف بتقديم خدماته إلى زائري مرقد أمير المؤمنين الإمام علي بن أبي طالب (عليه السلام)، المعزين بذكرى استشهاد السيدة فاطمة الزهراء (عليها السلام)، وذلك من خلال تهيئة الخدمات اللازمة وتوفير احتياجات الزائرين، إسهاماً في خدمة المعزين والمواساة بهذه المناسبة الأليمة.
#الإعلام_المركزي
🔰 أقام المجلس التنفيذي في محافظة النجف الأشرف دورة «البصيرة» المخصصة لكوادره، والتي تُلقيها مؤسسة كادر آية الله العظمى الشيخ مصباح اليزدي، حيث افتتح الدورة سماحة الشيخ ناظم السعيدي، رئيس المجلس التنفيذي، مؤكداً أهمية البرامج الفكرية والثقافية في تعزيز الوعي والبصيرة لدى الكوادر، وترسيخ المفاهيم الفكرية والعقائدية، وتنمية القدرات المعرفية والثقافية، بما يسهم في تطوير الأداء المؤسسي والارتقاء بمستوى العمل الثقافي والرس…
🔰تُقيم المقاومة الإسلامية حركة النجباء، هيئة شهداء العقيلة، مجلسها السنوي إحياءً لذكرى استشهاد السيدة فاطمة الزهراء (عليها السلام).
في بغداد – شارع فلسطين – جامع أهل البيت (عليهم السلام)
🔰 التقى رئيس المجلس التنفيذي الشيخ ناظم السعيدي وفداً من مؤسسة كادر آية الله العظمى الشيخ مصباح اليزدي، لبحث سبل التعاون في المجالات العلمية والثقافية، وإقامة دورات تدريبية ودروس فكرية وتوعوية تسهم في تعزيز المستوى المعرفي والثقافي.
#الإعلام_المركزي
🔰بيان المقاومة الإسلامية حركة النجباء
29 جمادى الأولى 1448هـ - 11 نوفمبر 2026م
❤16
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @TANFITHY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TANFITHY edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 November 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اللغة العربية 6 الاعدادي 2026 @Arabic_iraq · 26,295 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المجلس التنفيذي - TANFITHY” (@TANFITHY), 14,486 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TANFITHY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.