Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Луцьк. Телеграм Інформ

Channel

Луцьк. Телеграм Інформ

@T1_ua_portal

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,955subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001156445649
TypeChannel
Username@T1_ua_portal
Created9 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/T1_ua_portal

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@VolynSN/1277837 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC@T1_ua_portal/57817 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC1.0070 minutes
@VolynSN/1277937 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC@T1_ua_portal/57820 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@VolynSN/1278087 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC@T1_ua_portal/57830 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC1.003.5 hours
@VolynSN/1278197 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC@T1_ua_portal/57832 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC1.0044 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@VolynSN5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0062 minutes@VolynSN (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 31 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @VolynSN. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,9316,0035,9677 August 2026 — 5,932 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,932 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,931 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,941 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,937 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,934 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,943 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,938 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,941 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,942 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,944 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,951 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,957 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,950 subscribers26 September 2026 — 5,955 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,946 subscribers11 October 2026 — 5,960 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,003 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,002 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,989 subscribers24 October 2026 — 5,982 subscribers27 October 2026 — 5,988 subscribers30 October 2026 — 5,978 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,962 subscribers6 November 2026 — 5,955 subscribers5,9557 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,920–6,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 10:185,955-7
3 Nov 2026, 01:495,962-16
30 Oct 2026, 18:085,978-10
27 Oct 2026, 17:495,988+6
24 Oct 2026, 21:105,982-7
21 Oct 2026, 20:265,989-13
18 Oct 2026, 05:286,002-1
14 Oct 2026, 23:516,003+43
11 Oct 2026, 11:195,960+14
5 Oct 2026, 02:225,946-9
26 Sept 2026, 07:415,955+5
17 Sept 2026, 05:185,950-7
13 Sept 2026, 02:175,957+6
8 Sept 2026, 19:185,951+7
3 Sept 2026, 10:285,944+2
31 Aug 2026, 07:035,942+1
28 Aug 2026, 05:435,941+3
25 Aug 2026, 16:125,938-5
22 Aug 2026, 14:025,943+9
19 Aug 2026, 13:115,934first reading

Engagement

129 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 5,955 subscribers
Avg views / post
849
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.963%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 129 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held129 (6 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total23,784
Reactions total229
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 01:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 02s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,096 reactions across 128 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬32529.7%
👍15814.4%
😢12411.3%
❤1039.40%
🤯666.02%
🙏635.75%
😁494.47%
🤔464.20%
🔥383.47%
🤡363.28%
😱191.73%
💩171.55%
🤮141.28%
👏131.19%
👎90.821%
🤣70.639%
🥴50.456%
🖕30.274%
❤‍🔥10.091%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,096 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (3.57%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 20:28 UTC427 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @VolynSNPhoto

🤗«Я вперше побачила на відео свого внука»: історія жінки, яка виїхала з окупації на Волинь🫂❤️‍🩹 Після кількох років життя в російській окупації жителька Каховського району Анна наприкінці серпня виїхала на підконтрольну Україні територію разом зі своїм семирічним собакою Вінсентом. На українському кордоні їй допомогли зв’язатися з рідними, яких жінка давно не бачила. Під час першого відеодзвінка вона вперше побачи…

🙏5

4 Nov 2026, 20:25 UTC476 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🇺🇸 Демократи обіцяють скасувати тарифи Трампа та домогтися завершення війни з Іраном після перемоги на проміжних виборах, — лідер демократів у Сенаті Чак Шумер Він назвав конфлікт на Близькому Сході «необдуманою війною за вибором» і закликав адміністрацію негайно його завершити. Тим часом нафта Brent подешевшала на 9%.

👍4🤔1

4 Nov 2026, 20:24 UTC457 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026

❗️💸Енергетики, комунальники та залізничники, які відновлюють об’єкти критичної інфраструктури після російських атак в осінньо-зимовий період, отримуватимуть по 30 000 грн

👍4😁2

4 Nov 2026, 20:24 UTC455 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

❗️14-річний підліток із протесту в Петропавлівській Борщагівці потрапив до бази «Миротворець» Хлопця звинувачують у перешкоджанні мобілізаційним заходам і нападі на військових.

👍8🤯2🤮1

4 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC860 views26 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

❗️Суд обрав запобіжний захід Валентині Молодій, яка фігурувала у сутичках в селі Петропавлівська Борщагівка, у вигляді тримання під вартою без права внесення застави, — «Суспільне» Молодій інкримінують перешкоджання законній діяльності ЗСУ, поширення інформації про місце розташування військових та організацію масових заворушень.

👍16🤬5🤔2🤮2👎1

4 Nov 2026, 15:54 UTC888 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🇺🇸 Ймовірність третього імпічменту Трампа до кінця 2027 року на Polymarket оцінили у 78%, — Polymarket Сенатор-республіканець Тед Круз попередив, що в разі отримання демократами контролю над Палатою представників Трампу можуть оголосити імпічмент повторно. Раніше це вже відбувалося двічі — у 2019 та 2021 роках, однак Сенат обидва рази виправдав президента.

👍7

4 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC820 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🔴Глава МЗС Німеччини висловив надію на посилення допомоги Україні після виборів у США, - Bild Міністр закордонних справ Німеччини Йоганн Вадефуль припустив, що перемога демократів на проміжних виборах до Конгресу США дозволить збільшити американську підтримку України. «Щодо України, я налаштований дещо оптимістичніше і сподіваюся, що тепер у Конгресі відновляться більш активні переговори між обома партіями про те, …

🙏6

4 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC785 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

❗️❗️Вячеслав Зінченко, якого 1 жовтня Шевченківський районний суд міста Львова визнав винним у вбивстві Ірини Фаріон та присудив довічне, подав апеляцію на рішення колегії суддів, — «Суспільне»

👍4👎2🤔1

4 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC705 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @VolynSNPhoto

😞🏘️У Луцьку 21 будинок без опалення: коли відновлять теплопостачання🤔 Станом на 4 листопада 21 багатоквартирний будинок залишається без опалення через пориви на тепломережах. У «Луцьктеплі» однією з основних причин аварій називають зношеність трубопроводів, майже 75% яких потребують заміни. Більшість пошкоджень комунальники планують ліквідувати до кінця тижня.

❤3

4 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC918 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026

‼️👨‍⚖️ Операція «Карфаген»: НАБУ і САП викрили злочинну організацію, до якої причетні високопосадовці правоохоронних органів. Учасники систематично передавали хабарі посадовцям СБУ, Нацполіції та Офісу генпрокурора, щоб ті не перешкоджали роботі шахрайських колцентрів та інших незаконних бізнесів🤯 Під прикриттям правоохоронців діяли колцентри, що ошукували українців та іноземців, продавали наркотики, виготовляли ко…

🤡4👍3❤2🤯1

4 Nov 2026, 12:20 UTC955 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⚡️У 2027 році НМТ можуть змінити: замість чотирьох предметів — три обов’язкові: українська мова, математика та історія України. Блок на вибір можуть скасувати. Про це повідомила народна депутатка Юлія Гришина.

👍3

4 Nov 2026, 12:20 UTC954 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ПриватБанк остаточно виграв справу на $3 млрд проти ексвласників у Британії: Верховний суд відмовив Коломойському та Боголюбову в дозволі на оскарження рішення. Рішення зобов'язує їх сплатити банку понад $3 млрд за збитки від шахрайської схеми 2013-2014 років і тепер може бути виконане в будь-якій юрисдикції.

❤6👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @T1_ua_portal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Оповіщення Волинь
@Uvaga_tryvoha_Volyn · 106,838
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
Вечірній Луцьк - новини Луцька, Волині, України, світу
@vechirnij_lutsk · 43,463
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Повістки Луцьк Волинська область
@lutskpovistka · 69,020
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 August 2026
🇺🇦 Роман Романюк/ Волинська ОДА (ОВА)
@volynskaODA · 25,153
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Ігор Поліщук
@mayorpolishchuk · 19,725
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 September 2026
Волинські Новини
@volyn_news · 69,428
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Хуйовий Луцьк
@h_lutsk · 30,916
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 7 September 2026
ЛУЧИК повідомляє (важливе про Луцьк, Україну і світ)
@luchyk_info · 41,476
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Типовий Луцьк
@lutsk_tipical · 75,709
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Новини Луцька та Волині. Конкурент
@konkurentinua · 70,718
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
4Lutsk
@Iutsk · 59,018
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
Луцьк⚡️Труха
@truexaluck · 128,049
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Volynblog (Луцьк•Ковель•Володимир)
@volynblog · 126,914
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Луцьк. Телеграм Інформ” (@T1_ua_portal), 5,955 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/T1_ua_portal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.