艺名:#香香 深圳:#龙华 私聊:@xx125694 双向:@xiang24513_bot 频道:https://t.me/xx2586335 消费:400p 700pp 验证:#视频已验证 标签:#kiss #六九 #鸳鸯浴 #丝袜制服 #胸推 #按摩 #水中萧 #采耳

Channel
深圳三和修车大队【龙华区】
@Sz3hdslh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,541subscribers
+255 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002287358431 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sz3hdslh |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sz3hdslh |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 5,541 | +106 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 5,435 | +69 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 5,366 | +76 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 5,290 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 5,286 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 5,286 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.2%
- avg views ÷ 5,541 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 564
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (31 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,945 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 38s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
龙华丢丢骗定金 @diudiu1121 不要信,妹子估计跑路了,中介骗定金。
艺名:#茜茜 深圳:#龙华 私聊:@NNCJ0807 双向:@NNCJJ0807_Bot 频道:https://t.me/NJ008007 消费:900p 1600pp 验证:#视频已验证 标签:#舌吻 #六九 #鸳鸯浴 #调情 #制服 #嫩妹 #啪啪
艺名:#樱桃姐妹 深圳:#龙华 私聊:@jkaaa88 双向:@sdgx123_bot 频道:https://t.me/yingtaojiemei 消费: 日系泡泡浴1198/70分钟 日系起床人体润滑浴1298/70分 双飞泡泡1898p/70分钟 双飞润滑1998p/70分钟 单人泡泡2698pp/100分钟 双人泡泡2998pp/100分钟 包夜3500不限次 验证:#视频已验证 标签:#六九 #SM #陪浴 #搓泥 #调情 #吹箫 #胸推 #阴推 #臀推 #双飞
艺名:#小歪歪 深圳:#龙华 私聊:@lh2007ll 双向:@xiaowai2007bot 频道:https://t.me/lh2007ll1 消费:900p 1600pp 验证:#视频已验证 标签:#舌吻 #六九 #鸳鸯浴 #丝袜制服 #嫩妹 #长腿 #三点粉
深圳龙华小野猫.半裸抓龙筋顶级SPA个人工作室,龙根养护,真空负压! 主打特色🐲仪器+产品+手法,的结合让效果加倍! 既有情趣制服诱惑,又有女王丝袜按摩足交,还有情趣热舞帖帖,以独特梦幻浪漫为主,妙手柔丝把整个项目推向极致,加以优雅的环境和如梦般的手法,让人流连忘返、如痴如醉,带给您新鲜感,给您提供一个温馨舒适干净的环境,为您打造一个私人专属空间,达到释放身心和减压的目的!✨沉浸疗癒女友式魅惑,释放身心疲累的魔法 懂您所想,更好的满足您要求😍 让您愉悦身心的同时来一场激情与身心的疗愈! 可私人订制服务到店了解详情。 个人开的工作室没有代聊 哥哥们要来尽量提前一天预约 🈲止嘴炮! 温馨提示:哥哥们备好现金 私聊:@manman16898 大号频道https://t.me/qmanman413 小号频道https://t.me/manman333999 双向机器人:@mmandebot QQ:3871513945 地址:龙华区红山地…
艺名:#花花 深圳:#龙华 私聊:@huahuayiyi2 双向:@huahuayiyi3Bot 频道:https://t.me/shenzhen58888 消费:900p 1500pp 验证:#视频已验证 标签:#六九 #调情 #鸳鸯浴 #丝袜制服 #指滑 #嫩妹
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Sz3hdslh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,019,695 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳三和修车大队【龙华区】” (@Sz3hdslh), 5,541 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sz3hdslh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.