Channel
@Syria_cr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,044subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002279844150 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Syria_cr |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 8 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Syria_cr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 4,044 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 4,050 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 4,063 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 4,067 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 4,067 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
781 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 638 | 81.7% | |
| 😡 | 46 | 5.89% | |
| 💯 | 39 | 4.99% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 2.30% | |
| 🤔 | 12 | 1.54% | |
| 😐 | 9 | 1.15% | |
| 😨 | 6 | 0.768% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.768% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.512% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.256% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.128% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 781reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2024 to 25 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بخصوص الإشاعات المنتشرة حول أسباب "اعتقال" عامر مطر الناشط الحقوقي من قبل وزارة الداخلية، فإننا نفيد بأنه تم توقيفه أصولاً بناء على معلومات واردة إلينا تفيد باستغلال عمله للحصول على وثائق رسمية تخص الجهات الأمنية بشكل غير قانوني، ومحاولة استخدامها لغايات شخصية، مع العلم أنه جرى إخطاره بضرورة مراجعة الجهة المختصة بالموضوع للوقوف على كامل حيثياته وتفنيدها، لكنه تجاهل ذلك محاولا المغادرة خارج البلاد ما استلزم توقيفه على…
👍7😡1
🚫 #منفي وغير صحيح لا صحة لخبر نقل عن مصدر خاص عن إنشاء مجلس وطني للإعلام بديلاً عن وزارة الإعلام. #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍26💯2
🚫 #منفي وغير صحيح لا صحة للخبر الذي نشر على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي عن تعيين "أمير عجان الحديد" في مكتب أمن المعلومات بـ #دمشق #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍28💯1🤔1
🚫 #منفي وغير صحيح لا صحة للأخبار التي تنشر من قبل فلول النظام البائد حول الإنسحاب العسكري من اللاذقية وطرطوس. #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍43💯4👨💻2😐2🤔1
🚫 #منفي وغير صحيح تعاميم #مزورة بإسم #القيادة_العامة لا صحة لها. #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍26🤔5💯4
🚫 #منفي وغير صحيح لا صحة لخبر تعيين "ديالا بركات" كوزيرة للثقافة في الجمهورية العربية السورية. #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍25😡6💯2🆒2🤷♂1
🚫 #منفي وغير صحيح لا صحة للأخبار المنتشرة على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي حول طباعة عملة سورية جديدة. #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍24👏5
🚫 #مزور وغير صحيح لا صحة لما يروج على منصات #مزورة حول الإعلان عن انتهاء المهلة المفروضة على مناطق قسد المحتلة. #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍25😡10
🚫 #منفي وغير صحيح لا صحة للحديث المتداول حول استئناف عمل التلفزيون السوري. مصدر مقرب من وزارة الإعلام السورية. #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍33😡3😐2
🚫 #منفي وغير صحيح ادعت بعض المواقع التابعة لفلول النظام البائد أن الصورة التي ظهر فيها رفع العلم التركي في منطقة اللاذقية وبعد التأكد تبين الصورة في عفرين بريف حلب وتعود لعام 2017 #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍30👏5💯3😐1
🚫 #مزور وغير صحيح قناة #مزورة على منصة تلجرام باسم الهيئة العامة للمنافذ البرية والبحرية السورية #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍26💯7
🚫 #مزور وغير صحيح موقع #مزور نُشر على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي يتضمن تمويل للدولة السورية #المركز_السوري_لمكافحة_الشائعات https://t.me/Syria_cr
👍32😨6😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Syria_cr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,417,562 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Syria_cr named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المركز السوري لمكافحة الشائعات” (@Syria_cr), 4,044 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Syria_cr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.