Channel
@SwiftShillingArmyCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001605914906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SwiftShillingArmyCalls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SwiftShillingArmyCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 65 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 66 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 66 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@tonsoai just made it clear: quality Telegram creators come first. As with every new InfoFi platform, bad actors are trying to farm the $1M+ reward pool with bots. That stops here. The Tonso team is actively shipping algorithm upgrades to protect real creators and build the strongest Telegram Attention Economy possible. No shortcuts. No bot farms. Just merit. Bots are out. Real creators rise. May the best content …
20M+ Raised in the @intodotspace Public Sale. Wallet address for transparency: 8jUYBJafHPmBbPWpVHv5mfYmpF3Pwsq6QcXyK7ZYhFto Following community requests, participants now have the option to change their receiving wallets for receiving allocations and refunds over the next 4 days on public.into.space Article on the allocation process will be published Tuesday, 20th of January. Refunds will be processed on Wednesda…
Choose from $1M+ in rewards with Tonso's partner projects! ✅ 0.5% $VAULT & 1000 Buzz with Vault777 ✅ 0.25% $SLX & 1000 Buzz with @solsticefi ✅ $50K $TRIA & 1000 Buzz with @useTria ✅ $50K $SPACE & 1000 Buzz with @intodotspace ✅ 10,000 Buzz with Tonso ✅ more coming
@intodotspace will host its first Chinese AMA on January 13th, which will be simultaneously live-streamed on Binance Square and X Spaces. Kicking off our international world tour this week with only 4 days left: public.into.space https://x.com/intodotspace/status/2010562379474493545
With over $1M in rewards already distributed, this has moved way past "side hustle" territory. This is a full-blown career path for creators. Here is exactly where the liquidity is flowing right now: 💰 Active Reward Pools @solsticefi They are giving away 0.25% of the total $SLX supply to the Top 500 creators. Deadline: January 30. @useTria: The neobank giant has opened a massive $50,000 prize pool in $TRIA. @into…
@intodotspace Into is not just another token, it has a deflationary mechanism built in. Every trade on the platform generates fees, and those fees fuel buybacks. Bought tokens get burned, reducing supply over time. As trading volume grows, more tokens leave circulation, which creates upward pressure on price. This is Economics 101, decrease supply while demand stays constant or grows, and value increases. It is…
The "Attention Economy" isn't a theory anymore—it’s 2026, and Tonso is officially the place where social clout turns into liquid cash. With over $1M in rewards already moving, this isn't a side hustle. It’s a career path. 💰 Where the money is moving right now: @solsticefi: 0.25% of total $SLX supply for the Top 500. (Ends Jan 30) @useTria: A massive $50k prize pool of $TRIA from the neobank giant. @intodotspace: …
Found out @intodotspace is flipping prediction markets on solana ufo team energy 10x leverage zero maker fees real liquidity polymarket demand hyperliquid style retention points ranks airdrops all baked in simple predictions or high leverage plays space makes it effortless this is the new truth layer for defi and space is leading it prediction szn?
The expected @solsticefi FDV is rising there's now a 42% chance at a TGE above $100M that's; ~$39 per 1M Flares ~$10,000 average reward for Xeet creators prices pumping into Q1 looks great for a Solstice TGE 🔥
gm, put myself on the earn waitlist for @useTria and actually tested the card flow today how i did it > sent $178 from my wallet to the Tria card > a few taps via Apple Pay, payment confirmed, padel shoes ordered > cashback hit and XP credited felt like spending fiat while my crypto stayed productive what surprised me > $20M on-chain in 3 months, 50k+ users real momentum > load 1,000+ cryptos, spend in 150+ count…
Tria is coming with strong goals into 2026 @useTria CEO announced the numbers for 2025 reaching ~$20M ARR, over 150k users and 100M+ transactions, between Card and BestPath For 2026 they are pointing to 1B+ txs and over $100M ARR Annual Recurring Revenue is probably the most important metric specially for any company subscription based or with fixed price recurring products/services, I can speak by experience as I…
🤔1
What could the top 100 Solstice creators earn at TGE? > 1% of the $SLX supply > considering a 100% unlock at launch - $50M FDV → $500k rewards (~$5k/creator) - $100M FDV → $1M rewards (~$10k/creator) - $150M FDV → $1.5M rewards (~$15k/creator) ofc there won't be an equal distribution and the big rewards will be for top ranks
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SwiftShillingArmyCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SSA CALLS 📣” (@SwiftShillingArmyCalls), 65 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SwiftShillingArmyCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.