Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ну ты психолог!

Channel

Ну ты психолог!

@Svoy_Psikh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51,012subscribers

-1,210 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003098798573
TypeChannel
Username@Svoy_Psikh
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Svoy_Psikh

Growth

51,01252,22251,6177 August 2026 — 52,222 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,222 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,216 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,161 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,122 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,075 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,030 subscribers12 August 2026 — 51,973 subscribers14 August 2026 — 51,887 subscribers15 August 2026 — 51,813 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51,754 subscribers17 August 2026 — 51,694 subscribers18 August 2026 — 51,649 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,597 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,562 subscribers22 August 2026 — 51,489 subscribers24 August 2026 — 51,420 subscribers25 August 2026 — 51,386 subscribers26 August 2026 — 51,332 subscribers27 August 2026 — 51,286 subscribers28 August 2026 — 51,243 subscribers29 August 2026 — 51,197 subscribers30 August 2026 — 51,144 subscribers31 August 2026 — 51,080 subscribers1 September 2026 — 51,012 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 25 days, net -1,210. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,831–52,404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 11:3651,012-68
31 Aug 2026, 09:0651,080-64
30 Aug 2026, 08:2451,144-53
29 Aug 2026, 05:0551,197-46
28 Aug 2026, 05:2351,243-43
27 Aug 2026, 02:0751,286-46
26 Aug 2026, 05:1751,332-54
25 Aug 2026, 07:1251,386-34
24 Aug 2026, 04:2851,420-69
22 Aug 2026, 12:4351,489-73
20 Aug 2026, 23:2951,562-35
20 Aug 2026, 00:2251,597-52
18 Aug 2026, 23:3251,649-45
17 Aug 2026, 20:1451,694-60
16 Aug 2026, 22:2351,754-59
15 Aug 2026, 16:4851,813-74
14 Aug 2026, 01:1651,887-86
12 Aug 2026, 21:0551,973-57
11 Aug 2026, 18:1252,030-45
10 Aug 2026, 21:2152,075first reading

Engagement

117 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.30%
avg views ÷ 51,012 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
117 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
117
of 117 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held117 (3 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total196,739
Reactions total4,768
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 09:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,768 reactions across 116 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,47430.9%
1,07922.6%
👍67714.2%
🤣53511.2%
💯4609.65%
👏2585.41%
🔥2244.70%
😢200.419%
🥰140.294%
🍓60.126%
🤔50.105%
👎40.084%
😭40.084%
🤓20.042%
10.021%
🎉10.021%
👌10.021%
🤨10.021%
🤩10.021%
🥱10.021%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 117 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,768 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC511 views19 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#мысливслух Ну ты психолог!

😁14👍31👏1

31 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC918 views83 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Завтра 1 сентября. Тоже радуетесь, что вам не надо в школу? ❤️— да. 👍— теперь с детьми надо. #мысливслух Ну ты психолог!

51👍22😢6🔥3🤓1

31 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,000 views28 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#отношения Ну ты психолог!

😁204👍3👏1

31 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,160 views42 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Мы привыкли думать, что любовь – это то, что делает нас человеком. Оказалось нет, способность найти все картинки со светофорами – вот, что делает нас человеком. #этофакт Ну ты психолог!

😁3111

31 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,210 views0 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Срочно проверьте цифры своего номера телефона… Если там есть эти сочетания - вы годами можете ходить по одному и тому же кругу. Деньги пришли - сразу исчезли. Отношения начались - снова тот же финал. Стараетесь больше - результат стоит на месте. Совпадение? Или цифры уже давно дают вам подсказку? Телефон всегда рядом — звонки, покупки, документы, знакомства, общение… Но вы когда-нибудь задумывались, что именно скрыт

31 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈1,190 views50 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#смешно Ну ты психолог!

😁424👍4

30 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,330 views47 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Если хотите, чтобы человек не обижался, всегда добавляйте «в хорошем смысле этого слова». - Ну и мразь же ты. В хорошем смысле этого слова. #рабочийсовет Ну ты психолог!

👍29😁105👏2👎1

30 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,300 views41 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#этофакт Ну ты психолог!

😁25👏86👍1🤨1

30 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,330 views33 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Заказал ей цветы с оплатой наличными. Главное внимание. #отношения Ну ты психолог!

👍13😁12👏53

30 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈1,440 views59 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#смешно Ну ты психолог!

24😁19👏15👍1

29 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,460 views33 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Да блин🤣 #смешно Ну ты психолог!

👍18😢11👏4

29 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,470 views23 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Мужчины плохо переносят болезни и умирают даже при небольшом кашле, так как не могут родить, чтобы у них всё прошло. #мысливслух Ну ты психолог!

😁185

Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @Svoy_Psikh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ну ты психолог!” (@Svoy_Psikh), 51,012 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Svoy_Psikh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.