Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مکمل درمانی با سوپر پچ‌‌ های ایکس آورا

Channel

مکمل درمانی با سوپر پچ‌‌ های ایکس آورا

@SuperPach

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,490subscribers

+4,465 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004361120468
TypeChannel
Username@SuperPach
Created5 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SuperPach

Growth

256,0343,029.57 August 2026 — 25 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,049 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,049 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,034 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,371 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,126 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,927 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,641 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,490 subscribers4,4907 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net +4,465. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 05:174,490-151
24 Aug 2026, 15:574,641-286
20 Aug 2026, 15:334,927-199
17 Aug 2026, 23:035,126-245
14 Aug 2026, 15:565,371-663
11 Aug 2026, 09:186,034+3,985
8 Aug 2026, 11:322,049no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:312,049+2,024
7 Aug 2026, 12:0725first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 4,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.644%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held32 (5 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total31,060
Reactions total200
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 57s
Average length
1m 35s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

200 reactions across 30 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17085.0%
🥰105.00%
🕊63.00%
👌21.00%
👍21.00%
👏21.00%
😱21.00%
🙏21.00%
❤‍🔥10.5%
😁10.5%
😭10.5%
🤗10.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC65 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

از باشگاه اومدم خسته ترین بودم همیشه باید می‌خوابیدم🫠 اما امروز با ویتامین درمانی و تغذیه مناسب و مکمل های مناسب خودم قشنگ روپام😎 اینقدر انرژی دارم نشستم پای آموزشاتم و کارام💪🏻🙌

8

Signed Hadis.hatami

11 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC77 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

بدن آگاهی🧠🫀 @SuperPach

5

Signed Hadis.hatami

11 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC72 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

نقش سپر فرکانسی🛡 @SuperPach

3

Signed Hadis.hatami

11 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC81 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

5

Signed Hadis.hatami

11 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC102 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

سلام دوستان اکثرا که بهم پیام میدین مثل این دوستمون، وقتی ازش پرسیدم سپر فرکانسی داری گفت نه ‼️ و خیلیاتون سوالتون اینه که سپر فرکانسی اصلا چیه⁉️ 🔅اکثر آدم ها که بیمار میشن و پاشون به دکتر باز میشه و میرن بیمارستان کلی خرج میکنن روی بدنشون ولی چون بدنشون سپر فرکانسی نداره بیمار میمونن همیشه به جز محیط بیمارستان، هزینه و همه چیش اذیتت می‌کنه و روحیه ات هم ازدست میدی و بیماریت هم شدیدتر میشه کلی هزینه ام کردی😢

6

Signed Hadis.hatami

10 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC539 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

⛔️تاثیر امواج روی سیستم بدن⛔️ @SuperPach 🔰چطور از خودمون محافظت کنیم ؟🛡🛡🛡🛡🛡🛡

6🙏2👌1

Signed Hadis.hatami

10 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC576 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚠️خطرات امواج 5G دوستان عزیز لطفاً تا قبل از ساعت ۲۱ که می‌خوام آموزش و اطلاعات «امواج ماتریکسی» رو بزارم این ویدیو رو ببینین🌹 @SuperPach

5😱2👍1

Signed Hadis.hatami

10 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC886 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

دوستان عزیز مشاوره ها تخصصی برای شرایط خودتون انجام میشه و بهترین چیزی که برای شما مناسبه بهتون پیشنهاد میشه✅ ما اینجا قصدمون کمک کردن به شماست♻️

6

Signed Hadis.hatami

10 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,120 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

🟥فرآیند اتوفاژی در بدن چیه و چیکار میکنه⁉️ ✅در ادامه ویس قبلی این ویس رو گوش بدین عزیزان @SuperPach

8

Signed Hadis.hatami

9 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC≈2,400 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

⭕️چطور بدن می‌تونه خودش رو درمان کنه ؟ ❌اهمیت پاکسازی و سم زدایی بدن چیه؟ ❌چطور بدن نیاز پیدا میکنه به پاکسازی ؟ ❌چه سمومی؟ ✅ویس بالا رو گوش بده تا جواب همه سوالات رو بدونی و یاد بگیری @SuperPach آیدی من جهت سوالات شما: @hadis_hatami

11🥰1

Signed Hadis.hatami

9 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈2,330 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

8

Signed Hadis.hatami

9 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,000 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

سلام به همه دوستای عزیز که تازه به جمع ما اومدین🌹 لطفا در این نظر سنجی ها شرکت کنین ممنون😊

5🥰1

Signed Hadis.hatami

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @SuperPach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTCAnonymous Poll65 voters

لطفا بهم بگین از بین گزینه های زیر کدوم پاکسازی هارو انجام دادین؟

  1. پاکسازی باورها34%
  2. پاکسازی چاکراها34%
  3. پاکسازی خاطرات و تروماهای گذشته28%
  4. پاکسازی روده و مواد سنگین18%
  5. پاکسازی کبد15%
  6. پاکسازی غده صنوبری (چشم سوم)17%
  7. پاکسازی امواج و فرکانس های شهری12%
  8. دوس دارم پاکسازی انجام بدم ولی تاحالا انجام ندادم35%
  9. دوس دارم بیشتر یاد بگیرم در مورد پاکسازی52%

The shares total 245%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

معمولا سطح انرژی شما در طول روز چطوره؟

  1. اکثر وقتا پر انرژی ام15%
  2. معمولی46%
  3. احساس خستگی میکنم31%
  4. بی انرژی ام18%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

دوست دارم بیشتر با شما دوستان آشنا شم 💚 دوستان در چه رده سنی هستین؟

  1. زیر ۲۰ سال7%
  2. ۲۰ تا ۳۰ سال9%
  3. ۳۰ تا ۴۰ سال36%
  4. ۴۰ تا ۵۰ سال20%
  5. ۵۰ به بالا36%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 138,388 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مکمل درمانی با سوپر پچ‌‌ های ایکس آورا” (@SuperPach), 4,490 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SuperPach.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.