📕کتاب تو قورباغه ای یا نه ؟؟ 📗کتاب باشگاه پنج صبحی ها 📙کتاب شجاع باش دختر 📘کتاب روانشناسی عزت نفس 📔کتاب قدرت فکر ●پی دی اف کتابای روانشناسی رایگان رایگان از اینجا @tajvizAngize بردار
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••

Channel
@Subliminal_Rainbow
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,773subscribers
-341 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001470565379 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Subliminal_Rainbow |
| Description | 「من به هرچی که بخوام میرسم🪽💜」 ❌️ساب یوجی ندارم❌️ 《محاله با سابهام نتیجه نگیری،پس امتحانش کن❤️》 چنل سوالات وجوابها👇🏼 @subliminal_Rainbow1 فقط جهت سفارش ساب،کدوفال ونتیجه👇🏼 @tabasom_777 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Subliminal_Rainbow |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 06:09 | 16,773 | -13 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 10:05 | 16,786 | -10 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 02:00 | 16,796 | -13 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:19 | 16,809 | -17 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 00:09 | 16,826 | -10 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:39 | 16,836 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:59 | 16,847 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:08 | 16,856 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:19 | 16,869 | -20 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 16,889 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 16,901 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:21 | 16,911 | -17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:29 | 16,928 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:08 | 16,934 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:14 | 16,936 | -18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 16,954 | +8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:05 | 16,946 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 16,957 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 16,962 | -28 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 16,990 | first reading |
259 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 62 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 259 (2 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 54,758 |
| Reactions total | 1,183 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 20:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,138 reactions across 176 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 1,711 | 54.5% | |
| 💋 | 279 | 8.89% | |
| 😍 | 261 | 8.32% | |
| 🍓 | 247 | 7.87% | |
| 🔥 | 182 | 5.80% | |
| 😘 | 169 | 5.39% | |
| 💘 | 121 | 3.86% | |
| 🎉 | 83 | 2.64% | |
| 🙏 | 30 | 0.956% | |
| 👌 | 19 | 0.605% | |
| 🦄 | 19 | 0.605% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.255% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 0.255% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.032% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 188 of the 259 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,388 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 259 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 80 posts held from the last 30 days (2.50%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📕کتاب تو قورباغه ای یا نه ؟؟ 📗کتاب باشگاه پنج صبحی ها 📙کتاب شجاع باش دختر 📘کتاب روانشناسی عزت نفس 📔کتاب قدرت فکر ●پی دی اف کتابای روانشناسی رایگان رایگان از اینجا @tajvizAngize بردار
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
#مطلب_مهم #آموزشی 🌱کائنات چطور به ما پاسخ میدهد؟ 🎈اگر «کائنات» را نمادی از جهان، فرصتها و مسیرهایی بدانیم که در زندگی پیش رویمان قرار میگیرند، میتوانیم بگوییم ارتباط با آن فقط از راه حرفزدن نیست؛ احساسات، باورها، انتخابها و کارهایی که انجام میدهیم هم بخشی از این ارتباطاند. 🌿 وقتی خواستهای برای خودمان روشن باشد، بهتر میتوانیم فرصتهای مرتبط با آن را ببینیم و برای رسیدن به آن قدم برداریم. تجسمکردن و احساس…
❤🔥5😍1
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
لیست كارهايى كه بايد تو سن 18تا 25سالگى انجام بدى:
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
#آموزشی 📣 راه رها شدن از مسائلی که درگیرشیم اینه ... ✨ افرادی که از نظر انسانی به مراتب بالا میرسن (مثل عرفا)، به این حالت میرسن 🔄 هر مسئله ای که باهاش درگیری احساسی داشته باشید تکرار میشه @subliminal_Rainbow • ━━••🦋••━━ •࿐ྀུ❀❥
❤🔥6👌1😍1
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
من همیشه یه ادم افسرده تنبل بودم تا شب رو تخت لش میکردم به هیشکدوم از کارام نمیرسیدم تا اینکه این چنل پیدا کردم منبع انرژی انگیزس : @Angizeshi
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
🖤❤️🖤❤️🖤❤️🖤 🎧بیا اینجا هر چی آهنگ بخوای 5 ثانیه ای پیدا میکنی🎵 دانلود آهنگ ➡️
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
#مطلب_مهم #آموزشی 🌿🌸5 نوع استراحتی که بهش نیاز داری:👇🏻 1️⃣.استراحت بدنی مثل: ▪︎انجام حرکات کششی ▪︎خواب کافی ▪︎نفس عمیق کشیدن ▪︎یوگا 2️⃣.استراحت ذهنی مثل: ▪︎وقت گذراندن در طبیعت ▪︎کنارگذاشتن تکنولوژی برای کوتاه مدت ▪︎انجام فعالیت های مورد علاقه ▪︎گوش دادن به موسیقی آرام 3️⃣.استراحت اجتماعی مثل: ▪︎بیشتر وقت گذراندن با افرادی که درکت میکنند ▪︎کمتر وقت گذراندن با افرادی که احساس خوبی به شما نمیدهند ▪︎لذت بردن از زما…
❤🔥9💘1
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤🔥3💘1
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
• آهنگایی که تو کوچه و خیابون میشنوی ولی پیدا نمیکنی🤤♥️ @LATi_SONGS 🎧 @LATi_SONGS 🍻 قول میدم همه•آهنگاشو Save میکنی :)👆🏽🕊
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
#ذکر هر وقت #غمگین شدید این ذکر را بخوانید 🌿امام کاظم(ع) درحدیثی فرمودند هنگامی که چیزی شما را غمگین می کند این ذکر را بخوانید .👇 امام كاظم عليه السلام : ما مِن أحَدٍ دَهَمَهُ أَمرٌ يَغُمُّهُ أَو كَرَبَتْهُ كُربَةً فَرَفَعَ رَأسَهُ إلَى السَّماءِ ثُمَّ قالَ ثَلاثَ مَرّاتٍ: بِسمِ اللّهِ الرَّحمنِ الرَّحيمِ إلاّ فَرَّجَ اللّه ُ كُربَتَهُ و أذهَبَ غَمَّهُ؛ ان شاء الله تعالی. 🌸هر كس گرفتار چيزى است كه غمگينش مى سازد …
❤🔥13😍2
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
آااااقاا دیروز تو اسنپ طرف انقدر اهنگاشششس خفن و بروز بودددد 😍 نگم براتون اصلا دلم میخاست تا آخر دنیا باهاش سفر برممم😌 اخر دلم طاقت نیورد ازش پرسیدم آقا پلی لیست آهنگات از کجا دان کردی بهم ایدی این کانالو داد 🎼 @listenwithmesong
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
فایل صوتی ساب بالا👆🏻 •❤️🔥لیست پخش خود را حذف کنید.این تنها سابلیمینالی است که تا به حال به آن نیاز خواهید داشت❤️🔥• @subliminal_Rainbow • ━━••🦋••━━ •࿐ྀུ❀❥
❤🔥33😍3🍓1
Signed ••𝐓𝔞вᗩ𝚜𝐎ᘻ••
Showing the 12 most recent of 259 posts we hold for @Subliminal_Rainbow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Subliminal_Rainbow edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 29 posts on @Subliminal_Rainbow as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Subliminal_Rainbow named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌈🦋°•𝐒𝐔ᗷL𝕚𝐌𝕚𝐧𝐚L 𝐑𝐚𝕚N𝐛๏ฬ•°🦋🌈” (@Subliminal_Rainbow), 16,773 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Subliminal_Rainbow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.