Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Learn Programming تعلم البرمجة
@SuDevelopers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,415subscribers
-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001260151845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SuDevelopers |
| Description | Get started on your programming journey with our tutorials. Learn how to code and develop your skills in various languages with our beginner-friendly platform. For advertising and cooperation or to buy the channel Contact us: @tellmy_bot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SuDevelopers |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 27,415 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 27,425 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 27,438 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 27,448 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 27,446 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 27,458 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 27,458 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 12 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.98%
- avg views ÷ 27,415 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,640
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.429%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (12 December 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,048 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 256
- Videos
- 8
- Links
- 342
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
205 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 137 | 66.8% | |
| 🤣 | 40 | 19.5% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 7.80% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.95% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 1.95% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.488% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.488% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فيما رواه النسائي من حديث أوس بن أوس: "مِنْ أَفْضَلِ أَيَّامِكُمْ يَوْمُ الْجمُعَةِ، فِيهِ خُلِقَ آدَمُ عليه السلام، وَفِيهِ قُبِضَ، وَفِيهِ النَّفْخَةُ، وَفِيهِ الصَّعْقَةُ، فَأَكْثِرُوا عَلَيَّ مِنَ الصَّلاَةِ، فَإِنَّ صَلاَتَكُمْ مَعْرُوضَةٌ عَليَّ". قَالُوا: يَا رَسُولَ اللهِ، وَكَيْفَ تُعْرَضُ صَلاَتُنَا عَلَيْكَ وَقَدْ أَرَمْتَ؟! أَيْ يَقُولُونَ: قَدْ بَلِيتَ. قَالَ: "إِنَّ اللهَ - …
❤6
والمضحك في الامر انه لكي تعمل تطبيق في سوريا يجب ان ترخصه من الهيئة الناظمة للاتصالات ويشترطون عليك ان تكون استضافة التطبيق على سيرفراتهم المتهالكة و تمنحهم دخول كامل بصلاحيات كاملة لقاعدة البيانات الخاصة بالمستخدمين والتطبيق. وكل هذا بسعر "رمزي"
🤣6❤3
تطبيق عرض النتائج الامتحانية في سوريا الذي توقف عن العمل بعد دقائق من اعلان النتائج 😂
🤣9
لما تجيب مبرمج من سوق الجمعة😂
🤣14❤1
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله و بركاته، 🔝🏆قائمة بافضل القنوات التعليمية والتقنية على تليجرام: 👨💻القناة الرئيسية لتعلم البرمجة العامة: T.me/SuDevelopers 🖥 قناة لتعليم البرمجة بلغة ++c وكل ما يخص هذه اللغة: https://t.me/+4mUtC6_A2VozODRk أو https://t.me/NoCplus ☕️ قناة لتعليم لغة البرمجة #Java و كل ما يخص هذه اللغة: https://t.me/+hwjabzh_UDM2Yjlk او https://t.me/No_Java 🐍قناة لتعلم لغة البرمجة #Python وكل ما يخص هذه ا…
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فيما رواه النسائي من حديث أوس بن أوس: "مِنْ أَفْضَلِ أَيَّامِكُمْ يَوْمُ الْجمُعَةِ، فِيهِ خُلِقَ آدَمُ عليه السلام، وَفِيهِ قُبِضَ، وَفِيهِ النَّفْخَةُ، وَفِيهِ الصَّعْقَةُ، فَأَكْثِرُوا عَلَيَّ مِنَ الصَّلاَةِ، فَإِنَّ صَلاَتَكُمْ مَعْرُوضَةٌ عَليَّ". قَالُوا: يَا رَسُولَ اللهِ، وَكَيْفَ تُعْرَضُ صَلاَتُنَا عَلَيْكَ وَقَدْ أَرَمْتَ؟! أَيْ يَقُولُونَ: قَدْ بَلِيتَ. قَالَ: "إِنَّ اللهَ - …
👍2❤1
🔫#تحدي_ في البرمجة: كيف يمكنك طرح عددين بدون استخدام مُعامل الطرح "_" ✏️ يمكنك المشاركة في التعليقات👇طبعا يفضل شرح كيفية استنتاج الحل لعموم الفائدة للجميع... 📌ملاحظة: هذا السؤال هو من الاسئلة التي تُطرح عادةً على المبرمج في مقابلات التوظيف. 📌ملاحظة2: يمنع استخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي للحل. 🧰 فضلا شارك التمرين مع اصدقاءك المهتمين @SuDevelopers
🚦#تحدي_ في البرمجة: 🟢المستوى السهل: كيف يمكنك طباعة الاعداد من 1 الى n ؟ 🟡المستوى المتوسط: كيف يمكنك طباعة الاعداد من 1 الى n بدون استخدام حلقات تكرارية؟ 🔴المستوى الصعب: كيف يمكنك طباعة الاعداد من m الى n بدون استخدام حلقات تكرارية أو توابع جاهزة؟ حيث m و n اعداد صحيحة يدخلها المستخدم ✏️ يمكنك المشاركة في التعليقات👇طبعا يفضل شرح كيفية استنتاج الحل لعموم الفائدة للجميع... 📌ملاحظة: هذا السؤال هو من الاسئلة التي…
#تحدي_ #لغز_ منطقي لتنشيط التفكير المنطقي: اشترى صاحب صيدلية 10 صناديق يحوي كل صندوق 100 علبة دواء وجميع العلب متماثلة في الوزن (100 جرام) إلا صندوق واحد منها كل علبة يحويها اخف من علب الصناديق الاخرى ب 10 جرام، يريد الصيدلي ان يكشف الصندوق الذي يحوي العلب الخفيفة باقل عدد من عمليات الوزن ولديه ميزان رقمي. 🚦المطلوب: كيف يمكن ان يجد الصندوق المختلف باقل عدد من عمليات الوزن؟ 📌ملاحظة: هذا السؤال هو من الاسئلة التي تُط…
❤2
🔫#تحدي_ في البرمجة: كيف يمكنك التبديل بين قيمتين مخزنتين في متغيرين بدون استخدام مُتغير ثالث؟ ✏️ يمكنك المشاركة في التعليقات👇طبعا يفضل شرح كيفية استنتاج الحل لعموم الفائدة للجميع... 📌ملاحظة: هذا السؤال هو من الاسئلة التي تُطرح عادةً على المبرمج في مقابلات التوظيف. 📌ملاحظة2: يمنع استخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي للحل. 🧰 فضلا شارك التمرين مع اصدقاءك المهتمين @SuDevelopers
❤3😎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @SuDevelopers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 75,291 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@librarypdf1 · 475,560
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Learn Programming تعلم البرمجة” (@SuDevelopers), 27,415 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SuDevelopers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.