Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 85 days, net +7,517. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,713–43,743 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Oct 2026, 12:10
42,387
-20
30 Oct 2026, 11:56
42,407
-27
29 Oct 2026, 15:17
42,434
-53
28 Oct 2026, 11:45
42,487
-41
27 Oct 2026, 11:07
42,528
-14
26 Oct 2026, 14:26
42,542
-2
25 Oct 2026, 17:30
42,544
+2
24 Oct 2026, 14:35
42,542
+1
23 Oct 2026, 16:27
42,541
-2
22 Oct 2026, 13:54
42,543
-14
21 Oct 2026, 06:28
42,557
-29
20 Oct 2026, 05:56
42,586
+19
19 Oct 2026, 08:05
42,567
+40
18 Oct 2026, 04:57
42,527
+119
17 Oct 2026, 04:19
42,408
+86
16 Oct 2026, 05:27
42,322
+53
15 Oct 2026, 08:16
42,269
+18
14 Oct 2026, 08:08
42,251
+39
12 Oct 2026, 14:04
42,212
+351
8 Oct 2026, 00:36
41,861
first reading
Engagement
527 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.4%
avg views ÷ 42,387 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,000
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
129
of 527 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held
527 (11 August 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total
2,319,170
Reactions total
43,722
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Oct 2026, 22:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
261
Videos
74
Links
387
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
27h 31m
Average length
50m 02s
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
193,266 reactions across 527 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
131,236
67.9%
💔
19,418
10.0%
👍
13,277
6.87%
🤣
8,245
4.27%
🍓
6,882
3.56%
🔥
5,744
2.97%
😭
3,505
1.81%
⚡
2,621
1.36%
👾
1,008
0.522%
👎
694
0.359%
🆒
405
0.21%
🏆
231
0.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 527 of the 527 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193,266 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 527 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
292
across the posts below
Posts paid on
73
of 527 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Stream_Konkur. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 527 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 August 2026 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✅ هر مشکلی دارید مهم نیست ولی اگر کمالگرا هستین خودتونو اصلاح کنین
⬅️ کمالگرایی، بهویژه در شکل ناسالم و افراطی آن، میتواند مانعی جدی در مسیر یادگیری مؤثر باشد. یافتههای علمی متعدد، این موضوع را از جنبههای مختلف مورد بررسی قرار دادهاند:
۱. ترس از اشتباه و اجتناب از تجربه
⬅️ مطالعات اخیر نشان میدهد که افراد کمالگرا بهدلیل ترس از اشتباه، اغلب از آزمودن روشها یا موضوعات جدید خودداری میکنند. این در حالی است …
بچهها؛ فرناز کیوتو برای اولین بار اومده روی جزئیات شکلهای زیستشناسی کار کرده تا حتی توی چاپ روی کاغذ هم تا حد ممکن شبیه فایلهای اصلی باشه که تو چنلشون نمونه گذاشتن.
به نظرم واقعاً ایدهی محشریه، چون یکی از دغدغههای بچهها رو حل میکنه، مخصوصاً وقتی پای شکلهای زیستشناسی وسطه و جزئیاتشون اهمیت زیادی داره.
همونطور که میدونید طراحها روی جزئیات شکلها خیلی حساسن و این شکلها میتونن به یادگیری بهتر و تقویت حافظه…
اگه از نکات ریز تصاویر زیست که تو کتاب دیده نمیشن ولی تو آزمونا غافلگیرت میکنن خسته شدی!
این مشکل رو برای همیشه حل کردیم 😍
تمام تصاویر زیست کتاب درسی رو بهصورت بازسازی و ترمیمشده آماده کردیم و با وضوح بالا به صورت لیزری و با تونر درجه 1 چاپ کردیم تا ریزترین جزئیات حتی تو نسخه چاپی هم کاملاً دیده بشن.
‼️تو محصولات کیوتو میتونی دونهدونه سلولهای شکلهای کتاب درسی رو بشمری😎
✅محصولات زیست کیوتو:( تمام تصاویر بدون…
➕عمومی ها
⬅️دروس عمومی مد نظر ما ۴ درس دینی و زبان و ادبیات و عربی هست که یکم میخوایم در موردش بحث کنیم.
⬅️میدونیم که این دروس بطور کل دروس فرار و حفظی ای هستن و مثل دروس حلیات و مسائل نیستن پس طبیعتا جزییات در مطالعه شون دارن که باید رعایت کنیم که تک تک براتون بررسی میکنم.
⬅️زمان شروع عمومی؟
⬅️حقیقتا اگر انتظار دارید که بیاییم و یه تاریخ خاص و مشخص بگیم، قطعا کار اشتباهی میکنیم و داریم بهتون اطلاعات بدرد نخور مید…
✅ تغییرات ظرفیت پذیرش کنکور ۱۴۰۶
⬅️ ظرفیت در دو رشته پزشکی و دندانپزشکی همانند ۱۴۰۵ خواهد بود اما ظرفیتی که از ۱۴۰۵ برای ورودی مهر ۱۴۰۶ اعلام شده بود ازش کسر خواهد شد. مثلا؛
پزشکی ۱۴۰۵ ظرفیت کل دورهها ۱۴ هزار و ۴۶۹ نفر بود که از این مقدار ۳۷۰۳ نفر برای ورودی مهر ۱۴۰۶ درنظر گرفته شد و ۱۱ هزار و ۱۶۲ نفر ورودی ۱۴۰۵. الان برای پزشکی ۱۴۰۶ ظرفیت تقریبی همون حوالی ۱۱ هزار و ۱۶۲ نفر خواهد بود.
⬅️ درواقع در رشته پزشکی و دن…
اگه دیدین یکی خیلی ادعای منم منم میکنه، ازش فرار کنید.
چه دبیری که داره خودشو جر میده که فلان رتبه برای من بوده.
چه دانش اموزی که ادعای درصد فلان و نمر.ه بهمان داره.
چه مشاوری که ادعای وصل بودن به بالا و خبر گرفتن از جزییات رو میکنه.
چه دانشجویی که ادعایی خفن بودن راهنمایی هاش میکنه.
و..
همچین ادما فقط یه چیز برای ارائه خودشون دارن و واسه همین دارن خودشونو به لطف یه نردبون فرضی بالا میکشن. وگرنه نه دبیرایی مثل فرهم…
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥80❤32💔15⚡9
Signed محسن`
Showing the 12 most recent of 527 posts we hold for @Stream_Konkur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Stream_Konkur edited 18 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 October 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 174%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 527 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stream Konkur” (@Stream_Konkur), 42,387 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stream_Konkur.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
