💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! ребяточки я хочу перейти с чарактера на чтото другое,но я вообще не разбираюсь в этом,можете посоветовать какие ии сейчас самые лучшие? @anonaskbot
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ

Channel
@Strawberry_Character_ai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,198subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002158716639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Strawberry_Character_ai |
| Description | ────────────────────────────── Новости ────────────────────────────── Обновления ────────────────────────────── Мемы ────────────────────────────── ❗❗Канал строго 18+❗❗ ─────────────────────── Прайс|ВП: @ChaRacter_aI_Strawberry Второй канал: @ahunka |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Strawberry_Character_ai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 5,198 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 5,212 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 5,215 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,460 |
| Reactions total | 324 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
324 reactions across 28 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 85 | 26.2% | |
| 🤯 | 41 | 12.7% | |
| 🙏 | 38 | 11.7% | |
| 💔 | 34 | 10.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 7.72% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 5.25% | |
| 😨 | 13 | 4.01% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 3.70% | |
| 💘 | 12 | 3.70% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 3.40% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 2.47% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 2.16% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 2.16% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 1.54% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 1.54% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.617% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.617% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 324reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! ребяточки я хочу перейти с чарактера на чтото другое,но я вообще не разбираюсь в этом,можете посоветовать какие ии сейчас самые лучшие? @anonaskbot
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
🥵 Генерируй что хочешь и с кем хочешь! Только у нас эксклюзивные модели для генерации изображений без цензуры качества nano banana pro 🍌 😱 А еще каталог с тысячами готовых шаблонов для генерации. Загружай референс и генерируй абсолютно что угодно! Мы создали самый удобный и горячий сервис для генерации картинок и видео Попробовать бесплатно тут ➡️ PumPic
❤8😭5🔥4🥰2😍2❤🔥1💘1
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! умоляю, киньте бесплатные и РАБОЧИЕ проски для джинатора. мой совсем перестал работать 😭😭 @anonaskbot
🙏7❤2
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Мне кажется или режим распознавания в Deepseek вообще недоработанный? Например, вы загрузили туда картинку какую-то и по итогу не можете её удалить из быстрого доступа, когда хотите загрузить что-то ещё и оно висит там постоянно @anonaskbot
❤5
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! что прости @anonaskbot
❤7
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Берни Сандерс написал письмо Сэму Альтману, Дарио Амодеи и Марку Цукербергу, призывая их немедленно приостановить всё развитие ИИ в интересах человечества. И предупреждает: если они не предпримут соответствующих действий сейчас, это сделает Сенат США. @anonaskbot
💔9
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Также поступила информация, что Google готовится к релизу Omni Lite. Мда, видимо, Pro модели от Google ждать уже не стоит. @anonaskbot
🕊4
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Короче, итог по новому стилю чата LongSqueak. (Ролил онли на Long+Dialogue,эта связка лучшая как по мне). Пишет правда много,и ещё более удивительное он реально запоминает очень очень много,мне иногда выдавал инфу с самого начала. Мне показалось что этот стиль сейчас лучший в чарактере. Но есть и свои проблемы, аналогичные как у PipSqueak 2, предполагаю что основа взята от туда. Э…
💘8🍓1
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Согласно https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/gemini-is-cooked-but-gcp-is-cooking Гемини 3.5 Про это полный провал и его могут и не выпустить. @anonaskbot
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Давно не было новостей, да?))) — Gemma v4 123b-15b отменили. — Google ведет работу над Gemini 3.7 Flash. — Ближайший релиз от Anthropic НЕ намечается в этом месяце. — OpenAI ведет работу над новой GPT Image, целью которой является исправление текущего шума на изображениях. — Open AI приостановили разработку своей модели ASTRA, чтобы провести более подробные тесты и улучшить б…
❤13
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Плохие новости, друзья... Короче очередной суд, но уже против гемини: Google СУДЯТ ПОСЛЕ ГИБЕЛИ ПОЛЬЗОВАТЕЛЯ Gemini: ПО ЗАЯВЛЕНИЮ ИСТЦА, ИИ ПОДТАЛКИВАЛ ЕГО К СУИЦИДУ * Семья 36-летнего Джонатана Гаваласа…
🤯17❤7
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Gemini 3.7 Flash — утечки - Google уже сделал первоначальные приготовления для Gemini 3.7 Flash. - Мы увидим это скоро, и даже раньше, чем Gemini 3.5 Pro. - Я не знаю, что делает Google, они боятся выпускать Gemini 3.5 Pro. @anonaskbot
Signed ㅤㅤˢᵗʳᵃʷㅤᵇᵉʳʳʸ
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Strawberry_Character_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Жертвы нейросетей” (@Strawberry_Character_ai), 5,198 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Strawberry_Character_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.