Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐“ผ๐“ฝ๐“ธ๐“ป๐“ฒ๐“ฎ๐“ผ๐“ผ ๐Ÿฅฅ๐Ÿ“

@Storiess_19

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry

65,992subscribers

-132 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ€“100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001647292045
TypeChannel
Username@Storiess_19
Description๐‘ฐ๐’๐’”๐’•๐’‚๐’ˆ๐’“๐’‚๐’Ž ๐’”๐’‚๐’‰๐’Š๐’‡๐’‚๐’”๐’Š๐’ˆ๐’‚ ๐’‹๐’๐’š๐’๐’‚๐’”๐’‰๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’› ๐’–๐’„๐’‰๐’–๐’ ๐’•๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’“ ๐’—๐’Š๐’…๐’†๐’ ๐’—๐’‚ ๐’“๐’‚๐’”๐’Ž๐’๐’‚๐’“ ๐’”๐’‰๐’– ๐’Œ๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’๐’…๐’‚ ๐Ÿซด๐Ÿป ๐‘น๐’†๐’Œ๐’๐’‚๐’Ž๐’‚:https://t.me/reklama_storiss
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Storiess_19

Growth

65,93166,12466,027.57 August 2026 โ€” 66,124 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 66,083 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 66,073 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 66,080 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 66,067 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 65,968 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 65,931 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 65,992 subscribers65,9927 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 65,902โ€“66,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:4665,992+61
13 Aug 2026, 10:3665,931-37
12 Aug 2026, 08:4365,968-99
11 Aug 2026, 05:4566,067-13
10 Aug 2026, 06:4866,080+7
9 Aug 2026, 07:5166,073-10
8 Aug 2026, 05:2766,083-41
7 Aug 2026, 12:4566,124first reading

Engagement

104 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
2.39%
avg views รท 65,992 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
104 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.94%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
104
of 104 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 104 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held104 (2 August 2026 โ€“ 15 August 2026)
Views total164,186
Reactions total4,212
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
899
Videos
145
Links
186

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 30s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

4,212 reactions across 21 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค1,62838.7%
๐Ÿ”ฅ64515.3%
๐Ÿ•Š64115.2%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ54212.9%
๐Ÿ‘2155.10%
๐Ÿฅฐ1603.80%
๐Ÿคฉ1102.61%
๐Ÿฆ„741.76%
๐Ÿ˜541.28%
๐Ÿ’‹390.926%
๐Ÿ“330.783%
๐Ÿ’˜290.689%
๐Ÿณ210.499%
๐ŸŒš110.261%
๐Ÿ’…40.095%
๐Ÿ˜‡30.071%
๐Ÿ‘€20.047%
๐Ÿ˜˜10.024%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 4,212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 104 we hold a reading for ยท 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @Storiess_19. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 104 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC67 viewsread 15 August 2026

๐Ÿ“šโžก๏ธBepul kitoblar tarqatilmoqda shartlarini bajarib kitob yutib oling

15 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC202 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026

โš ๏ธKechasi bilan dars qilyotgan qizlarga:๐Ÿ“š โš ๏ธKechasi bilan dars qilyotgan qizlarga:๐Ÿ“š

15 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC223 viewsread 15 August 2026

๐Ÿ•บ๐Ÿ’— Kofta + Yubka 89.000 ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ•บ

15 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC302 viewsread 15 August 2026

Yigitila ko'rib qayta sevib qoladgan fasonlar๐Ÿ•บ๐Ÿ’‹

15 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC324 viewsread 15 August 2026

nomaxram bilan sevishayotgan har bir inson oโ€™qisin ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿ’”!

14 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC65 viewsread 14 August 2026

๐ŸŒŒ Tunda ko'rishga multfilimlar ๐Ÿ’‹

Signed I. DilลŸodbek

Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @Storiess_19. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 65,288 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Bilimdon qizlar ๐Ÿฉท๐Ÿ‘ฉ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ สณแตƒหขแตโฑสธ
@Bilimdon_qizlar ยท 6,426
6 posts
Taskinim | ุญุจ
@taskinim ยท 28,323
5 posts
Manoli Statuslar
@Chiroyli_Rasmlar_Gaplar ยท 25,159
4 posts
๐ŸŽž Uzoq Shaxar Daha 17 seriali ๐Ÿ“บ
@daha_17_uzoq ยท 60,756
4 posts
๐ŸŽฅASL KINOLAR๐ŸŽฌ
@tarjima_kino_filmIar ยท 28,356
4 posts
FASONLAR ๐Ÿฉท๐Ÿ’
@BahorgiKelinchak_koylak_fasonlar ยท 35,741
3 posts
๐’๐š๐ค๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ
@taqvoli_tv ยท 31,551
3 posts
Fasonlar Koylaklar ๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿ‘ 
@Xijobli_Qishgi_Qishki ยท 36,793
3 posts
๐ŸฐDisney grils ๐ŸŽ ๐Ÿ’›
@multfilmkinotv ยท 59,735
2 posts
Sevimli multiklar ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฉถ
@Multifilimlar_Ozbek_tilida ยท 23,181
2 posts
nixayati
@nixayati ยท 41,778
2 posts
B
@xuzurdaa ยท 19
2 posts
Arab tilini o'rganamiz.
@ArabtiliniOrganamizKanalii ยท 11,035
1 post
aynulmisrvlog
@aynulmisr ยท 8,528
1 post
๐’Ÿ.
@chiroyli_photolar ยท 9,193
1 post
๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐š ๐’๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ ๐Ÿฉต
@Glavniga_profilga_chiroyli ยท 44,981
1 post
202๐Ÿค
@loveyouuu010 ยท 15,683
1 post
๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ต๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ
@Makhmudovaa77 ยท 11,139
1 post
ะณะพะปะพั.
@manoli_golosIar ยท 40,614
1 post
Chiroyli rasmlar ๐Ÿฉต
@Profilga_glavniga_chiroyli ยท 82,392
1 post
ะงั‘ั€ะฝั‹ะต ะพะฑะพะธ ๐Ÿ–ค
@Qora_fonli_rasimlar_profilga ยท 74,111
1 post
sezym.uz
@sezymderym ยท 34,706
1 post
๐’๐”๐• ๐๐ˆ๐‹๐€๐ ๐Ž๐™๐€๐Œ๐ˆ๐™๐Ÿ’ฆ
@suvbilanozish ยท 25,809
1 post
ูƒู„ู…ุงุชู‡Uni_Gaplari
@uni_gaplari ยท 314
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐“ผ๐“ฝ๐“ธ๐“ป๐“ฒ๐“ฎ๐“ผ๐“ผ ๐Ÿฅฅ๐Ÿ“โ€ (@Storiess_19), 65,992 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Storiess_19.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.