5 measurements spanning 17 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 251β271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 03:55
253
-10
17 Aug 2026, 09:34
263
-5
8 Aug 2026, 17:44
268
-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:50
269
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:40
269
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 September 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
140 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2024 to 17 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for Β· 10%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @StellariumResearch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 September 2024 to 17 September 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Weβre excited to announce our first partnership, between Stellarium and GTOONS! π
GTOONS, just like us, has emerged from Gaspump and offers an amazing tool for creating stickers and meme stories through their AI-powered bot. To celebrate this partnership, weβre hosting a Meme Contest using GTOONS' tools to generate the best memes for Stellarium!
βοΈ The goal? Create the most epic memes for Stellarium using GTOONS' tβ¦
Thanks for your incredible support! π₯π
Weβve been working hard, and in just a few hours, weβre launching our first partnership. To thank you all, a new fun-game is coming with it, in just a few hours. Cooking.. β
We are proud to have such a strong community behind us. Together, weβve overcome challenges, including surviving the bot that drained liquidity at the start. Here we are β ten days later, still standing stβ¦
π Welcome to Stellarium Trading Place βοΈ
A revolutionary token built on TON, inspired by the mysteries of the cosmos. π Own your piece of the universe and join the adventure today! β¨
βοΈ Ticker: $STL (Stellarium)
π CHAIN: $TON (Toncoin)
The most exclusive cosmic token in the DeFi space has just landed, and nowβs your chance to be part of it! Stellarium brings the future of space exploration and decentralized finanβ¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @StellariumResearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@StellariumResearch named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
@stellariummeme named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 β 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βStellarium Research Center πβ (@StellariumResearch), 253 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StellariumResearch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.