Channel
@Stefs_Room
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,183subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002862743045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Stefs_Room |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Stefs_Room |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 1,183 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 1,185 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 1,183 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 1,180 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 1,172 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 1,164 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 1,163 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 1,161 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 1,155 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 1,141 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 1,141 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 1,142 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🚨HERE IT IS!🚨 You have seen my results. You have seen my accuracy. You have seen my student's results. I've posted my 0 to $10,000 payout using prop firms. You've seen my 19/20 Draw on Liquidity Accuracy (95% Accurate). You've seen my students making up to $40,000 in 1 day! It's all right in front of your eyes. Now the opportunity opens up: I am opening up spots once more for the 1on1 program! This program is fo…
One of my students having a near $40,000 day One day, $40,000 profit! This is what my students are learning! Do you want to be taught? An opportunity may come real soon….stay tuned:)
You’ve seen how accurate I am! I’ve turned many new traders into market wizards! Making REAL money. Changing their lives! This is what I do for my 1on1 members!
Feeling nice so here it is prematurely Trade: Long NQ Result: TP1 Hit✅ TP2 Hit✅ FULL TP HIT (+257.75pts)✅ Draw on Liquidity was clear as explained. 12-2 in my last 14 trades LIVE!💎
Who wants the trade recap of today’s 257 point move? I break down the complete analysis behind today’s trade. 75 ‘❤️’ reactions and I’ll release it here!
$906 x 5 Topstep accounts $4,530 day on the prop accounts alone
257.75pts Called LIVE w/ Premium Group🌟 Analysis played to perfection 12-2 in my last 14 trades✅ I told you, look at the generated liquidity!
Do I need to say anything more?
Let price reveal its hand
Market is currently bearish Longs aren’t in play as of right now
If no bullish confirmations, no longs. Simple as that.
Let the market provide the setup and execute responsibly
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Stefs_Room. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stef's Trading Room” (@Stefs_Room), 1,183 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stefs_Room.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.