Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Starlink Feed 🛰

Channel

Starlink Feed 🛰

@StarlinkFeed

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,972subscribers

+15,449 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002901935347
TypeChannel
Username@StarlinkFeed
DescriptionUpdates on Starlink, satellite internet, global coverage, speeds, launches, and services. 🛰 Unofficial fan & news channel. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Starlink.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held46
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/StarlinkFeed

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 7 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@StarlinkFeed/110 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC@elon_musk/120051 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@StarlinkFeed/121 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC@elon_musk/1211819 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@elon_musk/1213823 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC@StarlinkFeed/124 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@StarlinkFeed/126 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC@elon_musk/1217227 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@StarlinkFeed/135 · this entry5 Sept 2026, 22:30 UTC@elon_musk/122515 Sept 2026, 22:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@StarlinkFeed/161 · this entry6 Oct 2026, 22:30 UTC@elon_musk/125556 Oct 2026, 22:30 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@elon_musk32 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (25–7)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 7 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 44 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 7 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @TeslaOptimusNews. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 7 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,94033,69120,815.57 August 2026 — 8,523 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,518 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,387 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,305 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,260 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,198 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,140 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,092 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,053 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,018 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,019 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,940 subscribers14 September 2026 — 33,474 subscribers15 September 2026 — 33,691 subscribers18 September 2026 — 33,690 subscribers30 September 2026 — 33,613 subscribers5 October 2026 — 33,616 subscribers10 October 2026 — 33,584 subscribers13 October 2026 — 33,589 subscribers14 October 2026 — 33,583 subscribers16 October 2026 — 33,575 subscribers16 October 2026 — 33,607 subscribers17 October 2026 — 33,615 subscribers18 October 2026 — 33,629 subscribers19 October 2026 — 30,587 subscribers21 October 2026 — 30,454 subscribers22 October 2026 — 30,300 subscribers23 October 2026 — 30,148 subscribers24 October 2026 — 29,768 subscribers25 October 2026 — 29,512 subscribers26 October 2026 — 28,985 subscribers27 October 2026 — 28,831 subscribers28 October 2026 — 28,454 subscribers29 October 2026 — 28,168 subscribers30 October 2026 — 27,871 subscribers31 October 2026 — 27,447 subscribers1 November 2026 — 27,252 subscribers2 November 2026 — 27,104 subscribers3 November 2026 — 27,098 subscribers4 November 2026 — 26,727 subscribers5 November 2026 — 26,573 subscribers6 November 2026 — 26,267 subscribers7 November 2026 — 25,727 subscribers9 November 2026 — 25,390 subscribers10 November 2026 — 24,682 subscribers12 November 2026 — 23,972 subscribers23,9727 August 202612 November 2026
46 measurements spanning 97 days, net +15,449. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,077–37,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 21:1823,972-710
10 Nov 2026, 13:0024,682-708
9 Nov 2026, 01:0525,390-337
7 Nov 2026, 20:5625,727-540
6 Nov 2026, 15:5026,267-306
5 Nov 2026, 12:5926,573-154
4 Nov 2026, 15:0926,727-371
3 Nov 2026, 14:0527,098-6
2 Nov 2026, 13:3627,104-148
1 Nov 2026, 14:3527,252-195
31 Oct 2026, 15:1627,447-424
30 Oct 2026, 14:0027,871-297
29 Oct 2026, 12:3928,168-286
28 Oct 2026, 14:4728,454-377
27 Oct 2026, 14:4928,831-154
26 Oct 2026, 17:1628,985-527
25 Oct 2026, 14:3529,512-256
24 Oct 2026, 11:1629,768-380
23 Oct 2026, 10:1130,148-152
22 Oct 2026, 09:5630,300first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.957%
avg views ÷ 23,972 subscribers
Avg views / post
230
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held70 (14 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total1,377
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 03:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
99
Videos
24
Links
122

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 57s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 69 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @StarlinkFeed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 70 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 00:36 UTC85 viewsread 15 November 2026

SpaceX Super Heavy EXPLODES During Landing! 💥🚀 #elonmusk #spacexstarship https://youtube.com/shorts/f9Ull2rI4O8?feature=share

11 Nov 2026, 23:31 UTC159 viewsread 15 November 2026
Video

Home in rural Oklahoma is where this veteran and his wife enjoy the things that matter most. With Starlink, they can stream, study, and stay connected with family and friends, reliably and seamlessly. Discover their story this Veterans Day. https://t.co/dJDhgku0iK Source: @Starlink

10 Nov 2026, 23:30 UTC194 viewsread 15 November 2026
Video

Introducing Mini 2, the next-generation portable Starlink. Get up to 4.5 hours of connectivity on a single charge with the quick-swap battery, or plug in with USB-C. With built-in Wi-Fi, all you need is a clear view of the sky to get online in 60 seconds. Preorders are now open by invitation in the US. Be the first to know when it's available → starlink.com/mini-2 Source: @Starlink

9 Nov 2026, 23:30 UTC231 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Starlink is now delivering fast, reliable internet onboard FlyingBrussels 🛰️✈️ https://t.co/Jly6atnBkK Source: @Starlink

6 Nov 2026, 23:30 UTC326 viewsread 15 November 2026
Video

Imagine. Create. Share. Dream up a Starlink ad with Grok Imagine. Post on X for the opportunity to be featured by Starlink during the big game. Learn more → starlink.com/imagine Source: @Starlink

23 Oct 2026, 19:03 UTC382 viewsread 15 November 2026
Video

⚡️ Subscribe to the YouTube channel so you don’t miss any new Elon Musk news! 🚀

14 Oct 2026, 22:30 UTC525 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Starlink's high-speed, low-latency internet is now available in Curaçao! 🛰️🇨🇼❤️ → starlink.com/curacao Source: @Starlink

7 Oct 2026, 22:30 UTC595 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Starlink Mobile is now available in Bangladesh with banglalinkmela. Millions of customers can now message over apps, share location and stay connected on compatible phones in cellular dead zones 🛰️📱 https://t.co/svpmmFtDeU Source: @Starlink

6 Oct 2026, 22:30 UTC556 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

There is a bright and exciting future for humanity ahead – and space is fundamental to that future. To achieve this, space safety must be done right. We encourage every operator to not only share ephemeris data proactively the same way Starlink already does, but to also adopt the high standards of space safety that SpaceX and Starlink use every day → starlink.com/updates/space-… Source: @Starlink

6 Oct 2026, 22:30 UTC444 viewsread 15 November 2026
Video

However, we cannot mitigate risk when another operator maneuvers without sharing a predicted trajectory that includes the burn. This is the biggest risk in LEO https://t.co/5sqbmW1aD7 Source: @Starlink

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @StarlinkFeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Starlink Feed 🛰” (@StarlinkFeed), 23,972 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StarlinkFeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.