8 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026
🦉 جدی با کار اخر زنه قهقهه زدم
Channel
StarWire CN
@StarWireCN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003906887973 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StarWireCN |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StarWireCN |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 55 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 45 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 45 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 209.2%
- avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 115
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,381 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 22s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
8 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
یه بازیگر روکی به اسم زونگیوفی اخیرا دربارهی تجربهش از بازی توی یه درام کوتاه صحبت کرده که واقعا دلم براش کباب شد😭 میگفت یه سرمایهگذار خانوم پولدار~ که چون خودش روی اون پروژه سرمایهگذاری کرده بود، نقش اصلی رو هم برداشته بود؛ بعد خانومی ۶۰ تا سکانس بوسه به داستان اضافه کرده درحالی که کل دراما حدود ۵۰ اپیزود بوده... بعلاوه سر فیلمبرداری صحنههای عاشقانه زیادی هم داشتن و حتی خانومی سر یه سکانس رفتار نامناسبی باهاش…
7 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC63 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
رفتارای افراطی یسری از فنای لویوشیائو علیه لینگهه، حتی قبل شروع فیلمبرداری دراماشون، کلی جنجال بپا کرده... > بااینکه فیلمبرداری دراما قرار نیست تا اواسط سپتامبر شروع بشه، ولی هنوزم بعضی اکانتا با مین کاپل دراما بشدت مخالفن و عملا شورشو دراوردن! > پستایی که تو ویبو پخش شده شامل تهدید به حمله با اسید سولفوریک و لیزر؛ بعلاوه کلی توهین به لینگهه و فناشه.
7 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC203 viewsread 10 August 2026
سینا اینترتینمنت شخصا با منابع مطلع از ماجرا تماس گرفت و اونا تایید کردن که خبر توقف فیلمبرداری شایعه ست.
7 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC65 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
شایعه شده که فیلمبرداری درامای 念相思 شوشین و مینگهائو از دهم اگست متوقف میشه. ظاهرا تیم های هردو بازیگر باهم به مشکل خوردن و حرف از عوض کردن بازیگر نقش اول مرده. با اینحال سینت خیلی این حرفو قبول نکردن و میگن الان بیشتر از یک ماهه فیلمبرداری شروع شده؛ عوض کردن بازیگر مرد تو این مرحله خرج سنگینی روی دستشون میزاره و خیلیا هم میگن اصلا بعیده بازیگر دیگه ای تو همین حد محبوبیت پیدا بشه که بخواد وسط کار بیاد جای اون بازی …
6 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC369 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
این ویدیو از وانگییبو بالای ۱ میلیون ویو تو توییتر گرفته و بین سینت به دو دلیل وایرال شده ۱. عکاسی که داره ازش عکس میگیره و ییبو فلش دوربین رو با عینکش انعکاس میده تو چشمش > تو میای اونجا بشینی تا فنا ازت حمایت کنن ولی همچین کار احمقانه و بیشعورانه ای انجام میدی؟ > اگه نمیخوای ازت عکس بگیرن پس اونجا چکار میکنی؟ واقعا بی ادبه ۲. ویژوال ییبو > اون واقعا زشته، چجوری انقدر بزرگش کردن؟ > قیافش انقدر معمولیه که هرکی نشنا…
6 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC103 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
بعد از شایعات دیت لیوشیهنینگ و ههیو، استودیو هردوتاشون سریع اومدن شایعاتو تکذیب کردن و گفتن ازین خبرا نیست و ارتیستامون سینگلن.
6 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC99 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
رفتار صمیمانه مینگهائو با فناش باعث شده از طرف پلیس تذکر بگیره. 🧐 بعد از تموم شدن فیلمبرداری، مینگهائو سرش رو از پنجرهی ون در حال حرکت بیرون برد تا به فنا سلام کنه؛ این کارشو گزارش کردن و اونو بهمراه راننده برای دریافت آموزشهای ایمنی راهنمایی و رانندگی احضار کردن... اونا یه تعهدنامهی رعایت ایمنی جادهای امضا کردن و مینگهائو هم گفت که از این به بعد، بعنوان یه چهرهی عمومی، با دقت بیشتری قوانین راهنمایی و ران…
6 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC93 viewsread 10 August 2026
🦉 نه مثل اینکه 🍵 مینگهائو تمومی نداره !
5 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC109 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
یسری از فنای لیشیان نسبت به مرخصی استعلاجی ژانگجینگیی واکنش منفی نشون دادن و گفتن این کار باعث هدر رفتن وقت لیشیان شده خلاصه کامنتای تصویر : فنا از مردم میخوان ژانگجینگیی و مرخصیشو به لیشیان ربط ندن و لیشیان رو بابت این موضوع مقصر ندونن. بعلاوه از حرفه ای بودن لیشیان دفاع کردن و گفتن اگه قرار باشه مرخصی یا برنامهای تغییر کنه، با گروه تولید هماهنگ میشه نه لیشیان .
5 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC103 viewsread 10 August 2026
🦉 لیزر شوشین کار فنای مینگهائو بود؛ لیزر مینگهائو کار انتیهای مینگهائو
5 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC106 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
خب بعد از شاهکارای فندوم مینگهائو، انتیهای اقایی اومدن تو چشم مینگهائو لیزر انداختن و .... ☝️ خلاصه اتفاقات : > یکی پیشنهاد داده با پرداخت پول، با لیزر مینگهائو رو هدف قرار بدن که دادن. > دربارهی استخدام عکاس های سفارشی هم صحبت کردن. > همون فرد بعدا پستی منتشر میکنه و میگه عمدا خودش رو بعنوان فن شوشین جا زده. > تموم اکانت ها بصورت هماهنگ درحال جعل هویت فنای شوشین بودن.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @StarWireCN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 169,250 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“StarWire CN” (@StarWireCN), 55 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StarWireCN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.