Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stalin IVS old

@Stalin_IVS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,407subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001587913872
TypeChannel
Username@Stalin_IVS
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Stalin_IVS

Growth

2,4072,4162,411.56 August 2026 — 2,416 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,416 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,415 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,413 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,407 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,406–2,417 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:052,407-6
9 Aug 2026, 21:112,413-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:102,415-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:182,416no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:062,416first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 September 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2926.1%
🔥2926.1%
🫡1917.1%
🐳1311.7%
🤔1210.8%
😢98.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2023 to 28 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Dec 2023, 20:41 UTC≈1,940 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Напоминаем про обмен. Через 3 дня старые ivs нельзя будет обменять. https://t.me/Stalin_IVS/197

🤔2🫡1

12 Nov 2023, 12:24 UTC≈1,460 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Товарищи, этот канал остается открытым и более не будет использовать в качестве источника новый информации. Это теперь одна из страниц историй проекта. Вся актуальная информация находится в канале Stalin Foundation Если у вас остались старые токены, то до 2024 года их можно обменять в боте проекта EXTON Просто пополните IvsOLD и обменяйте на IVS После 31.12.2023 года, поддержка старого токена осуществляется не буде

🫡54🐳1🤔1

1 Oct 2023, 09:14 UTC≈1,770 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 У вас остались старые ivs ? Пополняйте xJetSwap и отправляйте 🔥 IvsOLD в самый быстрый и удобный ЕКСТОН ! 🔁 EXTON ОБМЕН НА НОВЫЕ 🫡 НАЧНЕТСЯ СОВСЕМ СКОРО! УСПЕЙ ПОМЕНЯТЬ!

🔥62🫡2

27 Sept 2023, 19:34 UTC≈1,610 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто не в курсе - можно завести старые IVS с джета в Екстон. На выходных будет замена токенов на новые. При депозите выбрать токен - IVSOLD

🔥41

26 Sept 2023, 12:36 UTC≈1,130 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StalinFoundationPhoto

🫡 Ура! Товарищи! Листинг!!! 🫡 🎉 Друзья, с радостью сообщаем о добавлении ликвидности к токену Stalin IVS ! Текущая ликвидность: 500 000 IVS 📈Уже открыты торги в следующих парах: - Stalin IVS / TON - Stalin IVS / jUSDT 📦 Торгуйте с удовольствием, добавляйте ликвидность, холдите ivs товарищи! 👨 «Советская торговля есть наше, родное!» 🗽Карта экосистемы: Staking | Chat | Bridge | DeDust | GetGems

🐳42🔥2🤔1

25 Sept 2023, 06:54 UTC635 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StalinFoundation

📶 Внимание! Начался обмен старых ivs на новые ! 👥 Не пополняйте и не выводите $IVS из TON Rocket, xJetSwap, Ton Doge, WalletExplorer - это может привести к потерям токенов. 🏖Если после перехода у вас остались старые $IVS вы сможете их обменять. Писать @amrok_yarko

22 Sept 2023, 19:26 UTC631 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StalinFoundation

🫡 Почти все каналы просят голосовать, а что мы исключение?) 🎞 https://t.me/StalinFoundation?boost

18 Sept 2023, 20:02 UTC≈1,120 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‍🚀 Rocket-чек на 200 IVS (1.7$) Внутри чека: 100 активация(й) по 2 IVS (0.02$) 💬 Скоро листинг, успей купить ivs на ido https://t.me/StalinFoundation/3

🤔2

16 Sept 2023, 17:14 UTC609 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StalinFoundationPhoto

🫡 Здравствуйте, товарищи! 🫡 👥 Спешим напомнить, что до листинга осталось 10 дней! 🎉 26 сентября 2023 года Stalin IVS будет добавлен в Whitelist на DeDust.io и залита ликвидность. 🔄 Для перехода со старой версии токена на новый Stalin IVS необходимо до 25.09.2023 все старые токены перевести на поддерживаемые переход телеграмм боты TON Rocket, xJetSwap, Ton Doge, WalletExplorer, где они обменяются автоматически! 📦

12 Sept 2023, 18:30 UTC823 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Заминтить за 0.11 $TON тут: https://t.me/StalinFoundation/7

1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Stalin_IVS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 415,351 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stalin IVS old” (@Stalin_IVS), 2,407 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stalin_IVS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.