Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stacks Sendors

@Stacksendors

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

921subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002163330266
TypeChannel
Username@Stacksendors
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Stacksendors

Growth

921924922.57 August 2026 — 924 subscribers8 August 2026 — 924 subscribers14 August 2026 — 921 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 921–924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:58921-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:00924no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:59924first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.5%
avg views ÷ 921 subscribers
Avg views / post
383
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.685%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total7,650
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
833.3%
👍625.0%
🔥520.8%
🙏28.33%
🤬28.33%
🍌14.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC281 viewsread 8 August 2026

Sharing for a friend who is hiring: We're hiring: Crypto Casino Reporter FairGambling is the layer of trust on top of online gaming. We review, compare and rate the platforms players actually use. Now we're looking for a reporter to lead our on-chain data/investigations coverage. What you'll do: • Deep-dive investigations built on on-chain data • Break news first • Deliver polished, sharp content you'd want to re

4 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC256 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Osiris dev keeps building, been ranging around here for a while. Imo its inevitable. Palantir pumped 100b yesterday and the on-chain open source palantir is at 120k 2nZNHm3Lr9umG3DVrzYwHgktwkuKuJRXqqRqs3ewpump

4

4 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC257 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/soulsimplifai/status/2084723242061688992?s=20

1 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC405 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

As I’m sure everyone has read. Coldcard had a vulnerability on their RNG seed generator. Over 1000 btc stolen from seed phrases through no fault of their own. It’s a sad situation to be in. Take your OPSEC seriously, even hardware wallets are not safe. I would recommend generating your own seed phrases via dice roll + generating a passphrase as well. Don’t lose all your hard work to an OPSEC failure.

👍4

31 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC463 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Some metrics for the people that are still in HODL culture : Only tokens above 1m created in july on solana , 50% are probably real ones with real vol, the rest in the picture are cabal slop bundles. Keep in mind this was a good month for solana compared w the last 3-6months. Of course theres gonna be narratives that will eventually break ceilings, but you will win more long term if you are a jeet or dont hold for

2👍2

29 Jul 2026, 01:04 UTC434 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Also, don’t expect multiple X’s on these. These are decent sized plays good for 3-4x’s Especially $CRED

2🤬2

29 Jul 2026, 00:56 UTC420 viewsread 8 August 2026

Both projects have a difference in FDV and circulating mcap Some supply locked by metadao behind metrics As usual DYOR, don’t expect these to be quick pumps expect to hold these for a few months

29 Jul 2026, 00:56 UTC400 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$RAWR - buying a fossilised RWA They’re trying to buy a dinosaur skeleton Solana seems to be soft shilling. Pumped heavy recently on a small retrace Would suggest looking for entry FDV is around 1.4m atm CA - 4K1m7gAMDKzrxQn68yuZAd767w57Fw7Ykw69dG3umeta

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Stacksendors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 329,777 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stacks Sendors” (@Stacksendors), 921 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stacksendors.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.