Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Панковец про бизнес

Channel

Панковец про бизнес

@SrbRF

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,404subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001964270252
TypeChannel
Username@SrbRF
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SrbRF

Growth

1,3861,4061,3967 August 2026 — 1,406 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,406 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,405 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,403 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,404 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,398 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,394 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,386 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,403 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,404 subscribers1,4047 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,383–1,409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 23:541,404+1
26 Aug 2026, 15:531,403+17
24 Aug 2026, 01:561,386-8
20 Aug 2026, 04:541,394-4
17 Aug 2026, 15:391,398-6
14 Aug 2026, 19:041,404+1
11 Aug 2026, 13:411,403-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:431,405-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:161,406no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:051,406first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.53%
avg views ÷ 1,404 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held10 (21 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total71
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3134.4%
👍2932.2%
🥰1718.9%
🙏77.78%
👌44.44%
👏22.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC38 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скачать «красивую картинку» из поиска, скопировать инфографику конкурента или взять кадр у поставщика без документов — одна из самых дорогих ошибок в интернет-торговле Сегодня правообладатели всё чаще выставляют брендам и продавцам маркетплейсов счета не на 10 000 ₽, а на сотни тысяч рублей. И суды безоговорочно встают на сторону авторов 📌Откуда берутся суммы в 700 000 ₽ и выше? В Гражданском кодексе РФ (ст. 1301 Г

👌2👍2👏2

3 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC33 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бизнес в 2026 году — это ежедневная маневренность между новыми законами, штрафами, блокировками и рисками потери кассовой стабильности. Можно учиться на своих ошибках и платить за них миллионами, а можно забрать готовые практики от тех, кто провел через кризисы сотни компаний. Сегодня в прямом эфире во ВКонтакте встретятся два практика с колоссальным опытом: 👤Валентина Панковец Предприниматель, антикризисный управл

🔥5🥰4👍3

30 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC45 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Эпоха, когда к персональным данным клиентов относились как к «просто списку контактов в эксель-таблице», окончательно закончилась. Сегодня старый файл База_клиентов_2023.xlsx, случайно оставленный на Google-диске с доступом «по ссылке», — это готовый повод для внеплановой проверки, миллионного штрафа или даже уголовного дела. Почему все так жестко? 1️⃣ Автоматический мониторинг. Поисковые пауки и скрипты сканируют

🥰6👍4👌2🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 03:48 UTC45 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Время, когда штрафы за отсутствие маркировки прилетали только по доносам конкурентов, окончательно прошло. Сегодня РКН и ФАС используют автоматический мониторинг ЕРИР. Самая частая ловушка — «самореклама» и закрепленные посты Предпринимателям кажется: «Я же пишу на своем собственном ресурсе про свой продукт!» Но у регулятора другое мнение. Если пост чрезмерно привлекает внимание к конкретной услуге или содержит а

🔥4🥰3👍2

24 Jul 2026, 06:22 UTC70 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

После инцидентов на складах и постоянных проблем с приемкой селлеры сталкиваются с одной и той же бедой: маркетплейс либо игнорирует обращения, либо выплачивает смешные 10–15% от стоимости товара. Большинство продавцов опускают руки, считая, что судиться бесполезно. На это юридическая служба WB и рассчитывает. Забрать адекватную выплату абсолютно реально. Главное — правильно выстроить алгоритм и не совершать типовых

🔥6👍3🙏3

23 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTC53 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Перед заключением B2B-сделки проверьте компанию по этим 12 пунктам через открытые сервисы (Прозрачный бизнес, ЕГРЮЛ, Картотека арбитражных дел, ФССП) 🚩Группа 1. Реестровые аномалии (ЕГРЮЛ и ФНС) 1️⃣«Свежая» регистрация: Компания создана менее 3–6 месяцев назад под конкретную сделку или тендер 2️⃣Адрес массовой регистрации: В ЕГРЮЛ числится адрес, где зарегистрированы десятки других юрлиц, или висит отметка «сведени

🔥5👍4🙏2

23 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTC45 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Представьте классическую историю: нашли подрядчика, обсудили задачи, подписали красивый договор, перевели 50% предоплаты... и всё. Сроки сдвигаются, директор перестает брать трубку, а через пару месяцев выясняется, что фирма на стадии ликвидации. Судиться с «пустышкой» — это просто выкидывать деньги на госпошлины. С компании без активов и штата физически невозможно ничего взыскать. Но все риски почти всегда видно е

👍4🔥3🙏2

22 Jul 2026, 05:27 UTC53 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Массовые проверки компаний, работающих с плательщиками НПД (самозанятыми), давным-давно перестали быть ручной работой инспекторов. Алгоритмы АИС «Налог-3» подсвечивают риски в автоматическом режиме. Если ФНС видит в вашем договоре признаки трудовых отношений (ст. 15 ТК РФ), переквалификация происходит за весь период работы. Итог: доначисление НДФЛ (13–15%), страховых взносов (30%), пени и штраф 20% от суммы. Главн

👍4🔥4

21 Jul 2026, 03:11 UTC49 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔍 Топ-3 скрытых триггера: за что ФНС доначислит налоги вашему бизнесу «задним числом» В 2026 году налоговая проверка начинается не с визита инспектора, а с того, что алгоритмы АИС «Налог-3» присваивают вашему бизнесу критический уровень риска. Если раньше под удар попадали только явные «обнальщики», то сегодня доначисления на миллионы получают абсолютно реальные компании из-за скрытых триггеров, которые собственник

🥰4👍3🔥2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @SrbRF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 261,519 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Панковец про бизнес” (@SrbRF), 1,404 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SrbRF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.