نصف تونل وحشت گذشت یک برد خفیف دو مساوی
🔥6

Channel
@Sprite_MediaHub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
18subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004421659569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sprite_MediaHub |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 3 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sprite_MediaHub |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 18 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 19 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 20 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 21 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 21 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
94 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 20.2% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 18.1% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 13.8% | |
| 🖕 | 9 | 9.57% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 6.38% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 5.32% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 4.26% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 4.26% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 4.26% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.19% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 3.19% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نصف تونل وحشت گذشت یک برد خفیف دو مساوی
🔥6
برای پدرو!
❤7
لیگنورو گرافینو و زیپارو پرایم
🤣4💩2
Video, posted without a caption
🤣5
Video, posted without a caption
🤣4
🚨 گزارش کوتاه اسپرایت تایمز | سه خبر داغ روز شایعات فساد در پرونده لاوربویز بعد از رأی کمیته انضباطی که لاوربویز را از جریمه معاف کرد و فقط مهلت پرداخت قسط دوم را تمدید نمود، زمزمههایی در جامعهی اسپرایت ورلد پیچید. برخی اعضا مدعیاند تیم صدرجدولی ممکن است با لابی یا پرداخت پشتپرده، رأی را به نفع خود تغییر داده باشد تا مجبور به پرداخت جریمه به گمبل نشود. هنوز سند رسمی منتشر نشده، اما این شایعات فضای بیاعتمادی به …
🔥3
⏳⏳
😁6😭2
کصشر نزنین
👍3🤡3🖕2
‼️ 🆕رأی جنجالی کمیته انضباطی دربارهی پرونده سولمیران؛ موجی از انتقادها علیه تصمیم اتحادیه🆕 ‼️ گزارش ویژه | رأیی که بهجای پایان دادن به اختلاف، بحثهای تازهای را در Sprite World آغاز کرد پرونده شکایت باشگاه گمبل از لاوربویز بر سر پرداخت قسط دوم انتقال «سولمیران» با صدور رأی کمیته انضباطی وارد مرحله تازهای شد؛ اما برخلاف انتظار، این رأی نهتنها به حواشی پایان نداد، بلکه با موجی از انتقاد و ابهام از سوی بسیاری از ا…
🔥4❤3🍌2🕊1
📌 پیوست خبر | رأی کمیته انضباطی صادر شد گزارش کوتاه | اسپرایت تایمز کمیته انضباطی اسپرایت ورلد رای نهایی پرونده انتقال سولمیران را اعلام کرد. بر اساس این رای تاخیر در پرداخت قسط دوم ناشی از روند اداری اتحادیه بوده و لاوربویز مرتکب تخلف شناخته نشد. این باشگاه موظف است ۶۵۰ اسپرایت کوین باقی مانده را پیش از شروع دومین بازی رسمیش با سولمیران پرداخت کند. اتحادیه هم موقتا همین مبلغ را به گمبل واریز میکند تا خسارتی نبیند…
❤4👎2
🚨 سولمیران دوباره دردسرساز شد؛ تکرار پرونده مالی و شکایت گمبل از لاوربویز گزارش ویژه | واحد تحقیقاتی اسپرایت تایمز باز هم نام سولمیران در صدر حواشی نقل و انتقالات قرار گرفت. بازیکنی که از ابتدای لیگ گمبل تلاش میکرد از شرش خلاص شود، حالا برای دومین بار در چند هفته، پرونده مالی و انضباطی به راه انداخته است. پیشتر انتقال او به آربی بلوگرانا به دلیل کمبود موجودی باطل شد و کمیته انضباطی جریمه سنگینی برای باشگاه خاطی …
❤5
Video, posted without a caption
🥰2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sprite_MediaHub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sprite Media” (@Sprite_MediaHub), 18 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sprite_MediaHub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.