Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
Daily Sports Analysis & Slips
@SportsAnalysisSlips
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,586subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001275598745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SportsAnalysisSlips |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SportsAnalysisSlips |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 5,586 | -24 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 5,610 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 5,612 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.84%
- avg views ÷ 5,586 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 326
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.303%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,611 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/FootballDataAlpha/8642
# 🚨 THE ERA OF DELETED SLIPS IS OVER Niaje operators. Mũrĩ ega? ⏱️ The football data space has a trust problem. Every day, timelines are flooded with hype, disappearing losses, edited screenshots, and empty promises. The market doesn't need another channel celebrating wins and hiding drawdowns. It needs accountability. Welcome to Alpha Football Data. 🔗 https://t.me/FootballDataAlpha We are not a hype channel.…
⚡ [SYSTEM VALIDATION: THE 3+ ODDS EXTRACTION] ⚡ Niaje operators. Mũrĩ ega? ⏱️ Look at the data stream in the terminal. August 2nd extraction fully secured: • FC Midtjylland vs. AC Horsens -> Result: 2:1 (FT 2:0) ✅ [Odds: 1.33] • Nomme Kalju vs. Tammeka Tartu -> Result: 5:1 (FT 5:0) ✅ [Odds: 1.62] • Dinamo Brest vs. Belshina -> Result: 4:0 (FT 2:0) ✅ [Odds: 1.25] Total calculated odds successfully cleared. No guess…
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
🏴 [EPL MATRIX: THE AUGUST 21 REBOOT TRAP] 🏴 Niaje operators. Mũrĩ ega? ⏱️ The Premier League returns Friday, August 21, when Arsenal hosts Coventry City at the Emirates. Amateurs see a giant vs. a newly promoted side and instantly rush to stack volume. Down here, we look at the structural micro-context: • Arsenal’s core international squad logged brutal tournament minutes in July. • Early-season physi…
❤1
💎 EUROPA CORE LEDGER: • Qarabag FK -> 1 (1.53) • Sheriff Tiraspol -> X2 (1.28) • St. Gallen -> Over 1.5 (1.20) • Besiktas -> Under 3.5 (1.25) • Hajduk Split -> 1X (1.32) We operate strictly from an alpha kind perspective. 🧵 2/3
❤2
💎 THE EUROPEAN CORE LEDGER: * Neftchi Baku -> 1X (1.25) * Bohemians D. -> 1X (1.21) * Levski Sofia -> 1X (1.31) * Basaksehir -> Under 3.5 (1.25) Strict 90-minute regulatory cycle. Pure quantitative data. 🧵 2/4
❤2
https://t.me/FootballDataAlpha
🚨 SATURDAY MATRIX AUDIT: 5/6 EXTRACTIONS VERIFIED 🚨 Niaje operators. Mũrĩ ega? ⏱️ Amateurs delete their history when variance hits. Alphas audit the ledger with total clinical authority. We operate purely from an alpha kind perspective—executing structural data analysis and letting the strict 90-minute regulatory cycle dictate the truth. We do not guess. We extract. The July 18 morning and afternoon cycle is offi…
Niaje operators. Mũrĩ ega? ⏱️ Amateurs look at the World Cup and see emotional narratives. Alphas look at the grid and extract structural data anomalies. Look closely at the macro performance trends from the last three global cycles. An active Tottenham Hotspur roster player has secured the ultimate trophy in sequential order: 🏆 2018: Hugo Lloris (France) 🏆 2022: Cristian Romero (Argentina) 🏆 2026: Pedro Porro (Sp…
[SYSTEM ALERT: SATURDAY MATRIX UNLOCKED] STATUS: HIGH-VOLUME EXTRACTION ACTIVE 👑 Niaje operators. Mũrĩ ega? ⏱️ The weekend volume is here. Amateurs are already bleeding out cash on emotional narratives and hype. Down here, we strip the noise and execute pure, clinical quantitative data analysis. We rely entirely on the strict 90-minute regulatory cycle. The early morning and afternoon nodes are fully audited. 💎 T…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SportsAnalysisSlips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kingsolomonbets1 · 134,536
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
@Bobbybetzzz · 112,637
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily Sports Analysis & Slips” (@SportsAnalysisSlips), 5,586 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SportsAnalysisSlips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.