Channel
@SpillTaehyungj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003667511497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SpillTaehyungj |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 20 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SpillTaehyungj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 6 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 6 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
48 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 41.7% | |
| 🤣 | 15 | 31.3% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 14.6% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Neng cindy mau sampe kapan nipu neng? Uang haram ngalir di tubuh lo, pantes ngebuat muka lo jelek kek beruk, tonggos. Tonggos, otak kemasukan tai. Makin lama uang haram ngalir di tubuh lo, makin gerogotin tubuh lo juga, biar tubuh lo kena penyakit, membusuk.
🤣2🥱1
Sticker, posted without a caption
mau lo bersihin ga nipu juga, kesimpulan nya sama: 1. nama brygar emg ga nipu, tapi wallet lo ada track record penipuan 2. carvin udah pasti nipu nah buat lah tu lu berdua, grup woksowkokw
ini ngakakkk banget https://t.me/Klarifikasitaehyungj/112 “yaudah gua bantuin nih” biasanya kalau org nipu tuh bodo amat loh, mau dia begimanapunn ga akan di gubris, bahkan di block, itu udh habbit penipu banget 🤣
👍20🤣13😭7💩2❤1🥱1
doa lo ga akan terkabul juga, gausah sok suci, ga takut karma gua, dunia ga berputar di lo doang. karma nya udah elu sendiri karna ada nya spillan itu, justru org yang lu tipu itu lah doa nya sekarang.
Sticker, posted without a caption
mau lo buktiin, ujung nya tetep sama? kenapa gue minta proof? ya biar keliatan aja oon nya, haha. pinter noh si carvin, betul, orang mana ada yang percaya 🤣
ea, bahkan si sunibe alias carvin alias siapa lagi dah, banyak amat, lo dah pokonya. https://t.me/SpillTaehyungj/111, pernah bilang ke ex si M di anon nya, buat ngelindungin @otaehyung nya itu. “waktu gue tanya se own bukan sama erick malah ngasih proof gini, seniat itu anjay” loh loh loh yang ngasih kan dia juga?? 🤣😩 gimana nih konsep nya? kan carvin beli username di brygar, tp carvin nya sendiri aja malah nanya ba…
Sticker, posted without a caption
dapet dari mana proof ini? dari ex nya si A. ini chattan waktu dia pake username @.ddilf sama akun nya pas jadi erick. jadi pas nge rp aja punya dua akun 🤣 @.ddilf sama @otaehyung. terus sering ngobrol di cf berdua, padahal sama sama penipu, so? yang berhubungan sama carvin udah pasti PENIPU. ternyata yang nasehatin juga si @.ddilf nipu di @spillddilf, aduh aduh, basii ya anying (note. sorry for mention, username nya…
Walaupun udah ngga, tapi pacarnya ga bertanggungjawab dan cupu malah lari nilep duit banyak orang apalagi yang dia curi ga main-main nominalnya.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SpillTaehyungj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,280,511 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@TAEHYUNGJ @OTAEHYUNG PENIPU!!!” (@SpillTaehyungj), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SpillTaehyungj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.