پویشِ نمیدانم خوب است در این شرایط جنگی ما هم مثل یمنیها، پویش "نمیدانم" را شروع کنیم. یمنیها در حملهی آمریکا به کشورشان این پویش را در فضای مجازی راه انداختند. کاربران در پاسخ به هر سوالی با "نمیدانم" جواب دادند و از دادن اطلاعات خودداری کردند. در ساعت آینده این پویش "نمیدانم" میتواند از دادن اطلاعات دربارهی محل شلیک موشکها و پهبادها و... موثر باشد. میتوان به اطلاعات صداوسیما بسنده کرد. کمک کنید این …

Channel
notcoin2024
@Spectatorship
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001856562167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Spectatorship |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Spectatorship |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 8 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 9 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5258332798409783582 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5424976816530014958 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5404558404565875143 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 16.7% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2024 to 15 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Spectatorship. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 September 2024 to 15 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
سلام همگی دوستان این صرافی یک گردون داره که شانس خودتون امتحان کنید😂برای 180میلیون وبرای هردعوت 40هم میده بریدبه خاطر4ساله شودن صرافی تاوقت بزنید😂انشالله برنده بشیدالبته برنده همه می شوندولی مقدارکم وشانس خودتون امتحان کنیدبرای احرازیک شماره همراه کدملی تاریخ تولدوبه نام خودتون باشه موفق باشید😂
https://omp.exchange/referral/ESMYQJALE
دوستان این ربات ۷روزدگه قرعه کشی داره واگه کلاه برنده شویدچیزی که گفتن هرکلاه نزدیک 40.50میلیون قیمت داره وکارخواستی نداره فقط تست دادبزنیدوشانس خودتون زیادکنیدتا۷روزدگه که قرعه کشی وبرنده کلاه شویدموفق باشیدهمگی 😂😂😎
https://t.me/DurovCapsBot/caps?startapp=1126049580
ربات جدید۲۸روزوقت بایدحیوان بخریدوبهش غذاو..تابراتون توکنش ماین کنه وزیادرومخنیست کلیک و..نداره به نظرم خوبه خواستین برید
t.me/zoo_story_bot/game?startapp=ref7191897721
کسانی که مینی فای زدن تافردا15.30بعدظهروقت دارین ولتی که گفته بهش وصل کنیدسریع اقدام کنیداونایی که چنداکانت دارن بهتربااین ربات انجام بدن تاموردنخورن @OKX_WALLET_BOT ربات استارت 12کلمه ازداخل مینی فای بردارین داخل این ربات واردوبریدمینی فاتستی که مربوط به این ولت هست روبزنیدووصل کنیدوگزینه دوم انتخاب تابه ربات وصل بشه وقت کمه سریع کسانی که نزدن اقدام کند
کسانی که این ربات زدن نوت بهشون رسیده چه باشرط و..برن برداشت کند۷روزوقت هست برداشت نوت انجام بدین کارمزهم برای انتقالش 0.06تون لازم
ربات جدید😂 این حتمابزنیدتست هاهم دادبریدتوسه روزتیک ابی گرفت وخیلی حرفش هست کلیک و..نداره مثل داگزهست بی دردسرفعلاتونکیپروصل نکنیدتست و..دادبزنیدوصبرتالیست و.باچندشماره بزنیدکه زیادست تون بیادپول بافیلتربریدباپروکسی هم می امد😬
https://t.me/PAWSOG_bot/PAWS?startapp=VQblJedl LFG! PAWS is the new top dog! 🐾
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Spectatorship. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدام ربات دوست داشتین😎😂
- نات😎71%
- داگز☺️14%
- همستر😂0%
- موارددیگر😅0%
- هیچ کدام😭14%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2024 to 15 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Spectatorship named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“notcoin2024” (@Spectatorship), 8 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Spectatorship.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.