Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

English Speaking محاوره انگلیسی

@SpeakingFa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,977subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001947223760
TypeChannel
Username@SpeakingFa
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SpeakingFa

Growth

1,9771,9821,979.57 August 2026 — 1,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,982 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,977 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,976–1,983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:241,977-5
7 Aug 2026, 23:281,982+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:481,980first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 1,977 subscribers
Avg views / post
333
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,651
Reactions total118
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9782.2%
👍97.63%
👏75.93%
🔥43.39%
🙏10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC88 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بر نور جمال پاک احمد صلوات برعطر وجود حی سر مد صلوات بر وجه نیکو وخلق نیکوی رسول بر خاتم انبیا محمد صلوات ﷺصَـلَّﷺوَسَـــــلَّـمْﷺ

8

5 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC148 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#نکته کسی میگویید برایم تماس بگیر ، می‌گوییم چشم. 👋لغت چشم / حتما، به انگلیسی چی میشود.. 🎓جواب: برای مکالمه روزمره، Sure و Okay طبیعی‌ترین گزینه‌ها هستند ✅A: Please send me the file. ✅B: Sure, I’ll send it. چشم، می‌فرستم. ✅A: Please call him. ✅B: Okay, I will. چشم، انجام می‌دهم.

5

4 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC163 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Believe in yourself. Every small step you take today brings you closer to your dreams. Keep going; your future is created by your efforts. ✨ به خودت باور داشته باش. هر قدم کوچک امروز تو را به رؤیاهایت نزدیک‌تر می‌کند. ادامه بده؛ آینده‌ات با تلاش‌های تو ساخته می‌شود. ✨

5👏1

3 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC208 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مثالهای کاربردی ✅Present: I am able to do it. من می‌توانم انجامش بدهم. ✅Past: I was able to do it. من توانستم انجامش بدهم. ✅Future: I will be able to do it. من خواهم توانست انجامش بدهم.

👍32

3 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC211 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✅Be able to = can (توانستن / قادر بودن) ✨فرمول: Subject + be + able to + verb ✨مثال: I am able to swim. (حال) I was able to finish it. (گذشته) I will be able to come. (آینده) ✨نکته: can بیشتر در حال استفاده می‌شود✨ be able to در همه زمان‌ها (حال، گذشته، آینده و …) قابل استفاده است

2🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC242 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

The sky will not fall in.

  1. آب از آب تکان نخواهد خورد38%
  2. آسمان چپه نخواهد شد20%
  3. هر دو معنی درست است42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

31 Jul 2026, 00:36 UTC284 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

گفتم: از عشق نشانے* *بھ من خستھ بگو ؟!* *گفت جز عشق محمد (صلي اللّٰہ علیہ وسلم 💚)* *هرچھ ببینے بدلیست . *♥️⸙الَّلهُمَ‌صَلِّ‌ۈسَلّمْ‌علَےَِٰنبيّنَآ‌ םבםבﷺ

16

29 Jul 2026, 02:50 UTC373 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

# Inspirational quotes جملات الهام بخش ✏️I have regretted my speech, never my silence. (Roman writer) از سخنی که گفته‌ام پشیمان شده‌ام، اما هیچ‌گاه از سکوت خود پشیمان نشده‌ام.

4

26 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTC437 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

در دنیا چنان زندگی کن که گویا مسافری

5

26 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC395 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Stay focused and never give up ✨ تمرکز ات را حفظ کن و هیچوقت تسلیم نشو✨

3

25 Jul 2026, 04:34 UTC416 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✅لغت پر کاربرد و احتمالا خیلی ها معنیش را درست ندادند ✅Classic = old or traditional + excellent + still valuable/popular. کلاسیک = قدیمی یا سنتی + عالی و برجسته + همچنان ارزشمند یا محبوب.. 📔نکته: پس کلاسیک همیشه به معنی قدیمی نیست

2

23 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC409 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

*♥️⸙الَّلهُمَ‌صَلِّ‌ۈسَلّمْ‌علَےَِٰنبيّنَآ‌ םבםבﷺ در میان آن رسولان سید والا تویی تو مقتدای انبیا در مسجد الاقصا تویی تو

12

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SpeakingFa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTCAnonymous Quiz50 voters

The sky will not fall in.

  1. آب از آب تکان نخواهد خورد38%
  2. آسمان چپه نخواهد شد20%
  3. هر دو معنی درست است42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz68 voters

انگلیسی در سراسر جهان صحبت می‌شود.

  1. English is spoken all over the world.57%
  2. English is speaking all over the world.43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz100 voters

آلو چه میشود؟

  1. Peach42%
  2. Plum58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

آیا در قسمت استفاده از passive مشکل دارید؟

  1. بلی73%
  2. نخیر27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 314,761 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“English Speaking محاوره انگلیسی” (@SpeakingFa), 1,977 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SpeakingFa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.