Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sparksduo [ZINE]

Channel

Sparksduo [ZINE]

@SparksduoZINE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

195subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004450514532
TypeChannel
Username@SparksduoZINE
Created12 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SparksduoZINE

Growth

16719518115 Aug 2026, 14:31 — 167 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 17:27 — 195 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 14:3116 Aug 2026, 17:27
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163–199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:27195+28
15 Aug 2026, 14:31167first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 12 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
584.3%
avg views ÷ 195 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,140
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held13 (12 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total13,672
Reactions total347
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

347 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓14341.2%
11332.6%
❤‍🔥3610.4%
💘257.20%
🥰113.17%
🙈82.31%
👌51.44%
🔥41.15%
😍20.576%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 347reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
165
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 12 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
120
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SparksduoZINE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC132 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

🤍отите, чтобы я провел здесь магму? Магма, естественно, будет по тематике канала. В голове уже есть неплохой концепт! Но пока что держу его в секрете от посторонних умов...🤫

  1. Да.👍81%
  2. Нет.🥱22%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤‍🔥7

14 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC246 views30 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026

Вечерний (скорее ночной) чат: Просто можете свободно пообсуждать любые свои хотелки на наш Sparksduo ZINE!🤩 ...Или просто пообщаться с другими подписчиками на отвлеченные темы, не касающиеся ZINE!🥺😝

💘178🍓5

14 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC262 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

🤍ак Вы узнали о Sparksduo ZINE?😊

  1. 🤍ерез репост в каком-либо Confession по РадиоСтатикам.👍45%
  2. 🤍з репоста в канал одного из художника по РадиоСтатикам.😳54%
  3. 🤍слышал/-а о нем от знакомых и заинтересовался/-ась.☝️15%
  4. 🤍ругое. Можете написать в комментариях! Мне будет очень интересно почитать!😁7%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🍓103

13 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC256 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

🥺⬅️🤩 вот теперь максимально серьезно. Вы хотели бы увидеть на нашем ZINE писателей??

  1. 🔤а.77%
  2. 🔤ет.26%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🍓126❤‍🔥3💘1

13 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC260 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

☺️то Вам лично больше всего приглянулось из нижепреведенного перечня жанров? (в контексте спарксов, разумеется)🥺:

  1. Что-то более милое и душевное.70%
  2. Стекло.50%
  3. Хорни/НСФВ.47%
  4. Веселое и насыщенное событиями.62%

The shares total 229%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🍓165🥰4

13 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC271 views33 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сейчас работаю над предложкой для анонимной отправки ваших вопросов! Благодаря ей Вы не только сможете задать свой вопрос, имея полную конфиденциальность, но и обеспечить ему огласку в канале! Сразу говорю, что просто необоснованный хейт по типу «зин хуйня» будет удаляться и будет грозить Вам баном в боте. Несмотря на полную анонимность,💘 Помимо вопросов можно кидать и предложения касательно мерча🥺 Кстати, по повод

🍓245❤‍🔥4

13 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC272 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Что там за ситуация на murdermedia zine.....? Простите, я искренне признаюсь, что ничего не знаю об этом и не был участником ZINE по каким-либо видам радиостатиков до этого. Так что прошу не распространять дезинформацию, что я являюсь соучастником какой-то движухи, о которой услышал только сегодня🥹

🍓169🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC296 views42 reactions120 Starsread 15 August 2026

А еще хотим сказать, что действовительно переборщили с количеством художников. Их будет намного меньше. Не хотел бы, чтобы вы посчитали изменение за дезинформацию. Жаль, что даже многие фанаты радиостатиков также поддерживают позицию закрытия нашего ZINE и во многом из-за сильно завышенного колличества художников. Насмотрелся такого очень много, но не расстраиваюсь! Просто соблюдаю все ошибки и рекомендации. Еще одна

26🍓11👌5

13 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC321 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

🌟акой ваш любимый подвид SparksDuo, если имеется? Можно выбирать несколько вариантов ответа!🌟

  1. Классические сериальные образы, которые наиболее актуальны в фандоме.81%
  2. Где Вокс с белым/сероватым телевизором (показан во время флешбэков Бакстера в 3 серии 2 сезона).25%
  3. Вариант, повсеместно используемый в период перед выходом 4 серии 2 сезона. Вокс в ± 1980-е годы.29%
  4. Оба в виде женщин (юри).42%
  5. Фем!Винсент и Аластор.17%
  6. Фем!Аластор и Винсент.16%
  7. Один из участников sparksduo вместе с вариатором Вокса/Аластора из другого вида радиостатиков.28%
  8. Односторонняя любовь (радиосайленс/статиксайленс).49%

The shares total 287%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11❤‍🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC366 views57 reactions39 Starsread 15 August 2026

🦌🤩🌟сем привет! Спасибо огромное за голоса в опросе и другую поддержу проекта! Мне очень приятно. Касательно голосов за «не интересует». Ребята, мне некоторые скидывали в личные сообщения, что в каналы по Хейту РадиоСтатиков скидывают этот опрос и просят накрутить голосов за «Не интересует». Хотя даже, если бы мне не скидывали мне в личные сообщения эти пересылки, то это и так понятно. На 500-600 просмотров, которые в

36❤‍🔥15🥰6

12 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈4,860 views40 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Poll

☺️аинтересованы ли Вы в ZINE?

  1. ☺️а, хочу стать творцом.21%
  2. ☺️отенциальный покупатель.17%
  3. ☺️сключительно наблюдаю.20%
  4. ☺️е интересует.51%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🍓23💘73🙈3❤‍🔥2🔥1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC≈6,130 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🤗😔😳👍❤️😔😊🤣❤️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ❤️😘😭😜❤️😔❤️☺️🤣🤩 😍🤩🅰️роголосуйте в опросе ниже, чтобы мы узнали вашу заинтересованность в проекте, пока ведется активная подготовка к полноценному старту... 🤩 🤩Sparksduo ZINE.🌟🌟🌟 😵‍💫🤩🌟еобходимая информация будет придаваться огласке в средства массовой информации через этот канал по мере ее поступления. но уже сейчас с уверенностью можем оповестить об обязательном наличии следующих позиций: 🥹🔤ин

🍓26🙈5❤‍🔥4😍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @SparksduoZINE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTCAnonymous Poll67 voters

🤍отите, чтобы я провел здесь магму? Магма, естественно, будет по тематике канала. В голове уже есть неплохой концепт! Но пока что держу его в секрете от посторонних умов...🤫

  1. Да.👍81%
  2. Нет.🥱22%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTCAnonymous Poll130 voters

🤍ак Вы узнали о Sparksduo ZINE?😊

  1. 🤍ерез репост в каком-либо Confession по РадиоСтатикам.👍45%
  2. 🤍з репоста в канал одного из художника по РадиоСтатикам.😳54%
  3. 🤍слышал/-а о нем от знакомых и заинтересовался/-ась.☝️15%
  4. 🤍ругое. Можете написать в комментариях! Мне будет очень интересно почитать!😁7%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTCAnonymous Poll141 voters

🥺⬅️🤩 вот теперь максимально серьезно. Вы хотели бы увидеть на нашем ZINE писателей??

  1. 🔤а.77%
  2. 🔤ет.26%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTCAnonymous Poll133 voters

☺️то Вам лично больше всего приглянулось из нижепреведенного перечня жанров? (в контексте спарксов, разумеется)🥺:

  1. Что-то более милое и душевное.70%
  2. Стекло.50%
  3. Хорни/НСФВ.47%
  4. Веселое и насыщенное событиями.62%

The shares total 229%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTCAnonymous Poll124 voters

🌟акой ваш любимый подвид SparksDuo, если имеется? Можно выбирать несколько вариантов ответа!🌟

  1. Классические сериальные образы, которые наиболее актуальны в фандоме.81%
  2. Где Вокс с белым/сероватым телевизором (показан во время флешбэков Бакстера в 3 серии 2 сезона).25%
  3. Вариант, повсеместно используемый в период перед выходом 4 серии 2 сезона. Вокс в ± 1980-е годы.29%
  4. Оба в виде женщин (юри).42%
  5. Фем!Винсент и Аластор.17%
  6. Фем!Аластор и Винсент.16%
  7. Один из участников sparksduo вместе с вариатором Вокса/Аластора из другого вида радиостатиков.28%
  8. Односторонняя любовь (радиосайленс/статиксайленс).49%

The shares total 287%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTCAnonymous Poll781 voters

☺️аинтересованы ли Вы в ZINE?

  1. ☺️а, хочу стать творцом.21%
  2. ☺️отенциальный покупатель.17%
  3. ☺️сключительно наблюдаю.20%
  4. ☺️е интересует.51%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 105,750 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sparksduo [ZINE]” (@SparksduoZINE), 195 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SparksduoZINE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.