Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔧 | 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗚 𝗠𝗘𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗖

@Spanner_PT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004476649627
TypeChannel
Username@Spanner_PT
Description────────────────
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 15 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Spanner_PT

Growth

2511 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 25 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:45 — 25 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:3211 Aug 2026, 23:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:4525no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:3225first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
94.7%
avg views ÷ 25 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (15 July 202629 July 2026)
Views total450
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
15
Videos
1
Links
31

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳2161.8%
🆒617.6%
😇38.82%
😭25.88%
🙏25.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @pelicantownn

ᯓ★. Рест. ♡₊˚ Ожидание сети. . . , , Спаннер откладывает ведение блога до 15 августа Просьба не тревожить его и не отписываться от канала!

😭2🙏2

25 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ᎠᏆNᏀ-ᎠᏆNᏀ! ᏚᎷᏚ fᴏr ʍᴇ? 💬: Ты упоминал, что тебе нравится дуо Бёрдли и Криса в дельтаруне. Чем именно? ꕀОни очень смешные. Даже вижу в Бердли себя на самом деле, поэтому ставя себя на его место, мне комфортнее всего его видеть с Крисом, нежели с той же Сьюзи или Ноэлль. Про Ральзея вообще молчу, мне совершенно не нравится этот персонаж ;[ 🦷А еще эти двое напоминают мне мою дружбу с кое-кем 👀

🐳1

25 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ᎠᏆNᏀ-ᎠᏆNᏀ! ᏚᎷᏚ fᴏr ʍᴇ? 💬: Как ты познакомился с психонавтами и чем тебе понравилась эта игра? ꕀОй, кстати интересный вопрос!!! Я наткнулся на эту игру при намеренных поисках, просто я очень люблю игры с нестандартным визуалом 🌟 🦷А понравились мне психонавты тем, что у игры прям действительно индивидуальная идея. Где вы еще увидите игру, где вы сможете побывать в головах других людей, покопаться в их психике и поборо

🐳2🆒1

25 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTC22 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

┊ ꕀОй, я тут заметил, что мне вопросиков насыпали! 😆 🦷Я рад, что кому-то интересно что-то про меня узнать, ехехе ᎠᏆNᏀ-ᎠᏆNᏀ! ᏚᎷᏚ fᴏr ʍᴇ? 💬: Спаннер, привет! С какой техникой ты в принципе работаешь? С любой или есть механизмы, которые ты предпочитаешь не трогать? ꕀЯ работаю абсолютно со всем! 🤨 Я люблю копаться абсолютно в любой механике, электронике и электрике (да, последнее два - это разное, их ОЧ часто путают!)

🐳2🆒2

22 Jul 2026, 22:46 UTC17 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @ColinPelicanTownPhoto

𖦹❤୭˚. ᵎᵎ。🍋𖦹°‧ #post ㅤ ㅤЭто, ребята... Помните этот... веб сериал, который я стал смотреть из-за Фиксика??? Я, короче, ево досмотрел и-и-и... ㅤ ㅤЭт я и Спаннер. У меня всё.🏃

20 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

┊ ꕀСпасибо огромное. Это правда многое для меня значит! Голубоволосый втиснул свою ладонь в чужие волосы, поглаживая пальцами кожу головы Колина. ꕀТы собственно, сам по себе много для меня значишь... Было бы наоборот, я бы не стал интересоваться увиденным. Твоё появление в моей жизни стало очень важным моментом, правда-правда! ☺️ И я хочу доверять тебе, хочу что бы ты доверял мне. Что бы тебе было со мной так же ко

🐳1

20 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

┊ Лицо Спаннера с каждым словом принимало всё более удивленное выражение. А сказ про сестру так вообще выбил из колеи нормальной реакции. ꕀЧто-то мне подсказывает, что каждая новая подробность будет звучать хуже предыдущей. Хмурный взгляд юноши сменился на более грустный. Будучи таким же беспризорником, он понимал, что из себя представляет плохое отношение от окружающих. Да и имеется у него тоже один фантомный горе

🐳2

20 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

┊ Мальчишка не стал перебивать Николаса, молча слушая его краткий сказ о былых "чудесах" своей жизни. ꕀ . . . Всё было действительно настолько плохо? Что бы решил уйти Спору не было, мальчишка действительно удивился такому ответу, однако виду на это решил не показывать. Он попытался глянуть на Колина максимально спокойным взглядом, которым только мог, дабы дать другу возможность понять, что тот Спаннер осуждать его

🐳1

20 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

┊ ꕀГод?! Пропавшим без вести?! ЗАБИТЬ??? Нет, ну конечно я тебя неправильно пойму, если ты продолжишь молчать в тряпочку 😒 Спаннер сначала приблизившись к Колину, схватил его за плечи, но быстро отстранился. ꕀКолин, пожалуйста. Это вопрос моего доверия к тебе.

🐳1

20 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

┊ ꕀСядь и слушай Спаннер замялся, вспоминая свой план на диалог, который все же... Благополучно забыл. Потупив пару секунд в стену, он поднял взгляд на Колина. ꕀКороче, ээ... Пока мы были в Зузу, пока мы выходили из кафе, я увидел листовку. Позже, когда нас забирал Мистер Элиас, на одном из столбов я видел ту же самую листовку. Ну и даже до того, как мы добрались до кафе, она мне тоже попадалась на глаза, но я изна

🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Spanner_PT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 918,083 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔧 | 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗚 𝗠𝗘𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗖” (@Spanner_PT), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Spanner_PT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.