Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sплетница

Channel

Sплетница

@Sp_letnica

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

8,533subscribers

-427 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002184806482
TypeChannel
Username@Sp_letnica
DescriptionТексты о людях, чувствах и важных моментах ✍️ Здесь случаются неожиданные встречи и решения, а омск порой становится частью этих историй 📚
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sp_letnica

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Sp_letnica/12377 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC@anon_sydbi/1299819 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC1.008 days
@Sp_letnica/12396 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC@anon_sydbi/1301520 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC1.008 days
@anon_sydbi/1291015 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@Sp_letnica/12450 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@anon_sydbi/1301820 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC@Sp_letnica/12550 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@Sp_letnica/12610 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC@anon_sydbi/1306723 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@Sp_letnica/12630 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC@anon_sydbi/1308724 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@anon_sydbi16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@anon_sydbi (13–3)
@Ispovednik_K14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (8–6)
@zhenskie_istoriy14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (10–4)
@Otkrovenii_ya9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Otkrovenii_ya (7–2)
@DamskiuGolos8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@DamskiuGolos (6–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 36 of the 36 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 243 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,5338,9608,746.511 August 2026 — 8,960 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,956 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,915 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,895 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,893 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,880 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,877 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,873 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,856 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,839 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,841 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,831 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,828 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,778 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,750 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,711 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,694 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,683 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,673 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,661 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,650 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,621 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,600 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,584 subscribers9 November 2026 — 8,567 subscribers14 November 2026 — 8,533 subscribers11 August 202614 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -427. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,469–9,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 12:458,533-34
9 Nov 2026, 20:558,567-17
6 Nov 2026, 10:408,584-16
3 Nov 2026, 17:278,600-21
31 Oct 2026, 20:018,621-29
29 Oct 2026, 05:078,650-11
26 Oct 2026, 07:468,661-12
23 Oct 2026, 15:198,673-10
20 Oct 2026, 23:498,683-11
18 Oct 2026, 06:058,694-17
15 Oct 2026, 04:398,711-39
12 Oct 2026, 01:198,750-28
5 Oct 2026, 00:368,778-50
26 Sept 2026, 04:208,828-3
17 Sept 2026, 04:008,831-10
13 Sept 2026, 11:008,841+2
9 Sept 2026, 12:378,839-17
4 Sept 2026, 01:358,856-17
31 Aug 2026, 17:048,873-4
29 Aug 2026, 02:138,877first reading

Engagement

351 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.22%
avg views ÷ 8,533 subscribers
Avg views / post
274
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.367%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
142
of 351 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 142 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held351 (11 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total38,977
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 01:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈122
Videos
≈4
Links
≈5,730

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1173.3%
👍213.3%
💊16.67%
🤷‍♀16.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 351 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 351 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 142 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 00:00 UTC22 viewsread 15 November 2026

Отдыхали в другой стране не в сезон. Океан потрясает своей мощью. Ты стоишь в воде по колено, а через мгновение, тебя накрывает с головой. Плавать запрещено, красные флажки повсюду. Глухая деревня, спасательной техники нет. Местные жители подходят к каждому туристу и предупреждают, что плавать опасно. Приехала семья: мать, отец, дочь. В первый же день отец полез в океан поплавать. На предупреждения не реагировал, уве…

14 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC106 viewsread 15 November 2026

Мои бабушка и дедушка родились в один день, в один год, в одном роддоме, с разницей в 6 часов. Познакомились они спустя 14 лет. В 17 моему дедушке приснилось, что он женится на бабушке. Спустя 4 года дед добивается-таки моей бабушки и они женятся. Спустя 9 месяцев рождается моя мама. С тех пор прошло 55 лет. Было много всего: и ссоры, и измены, и расходы, и снова вместе. Но по сей день дедушка целует бабушку, будто е…

14 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC144 viewsread 15 November 2026

Попросил меня знакомый историк описать экспонаты для школьного военного музея. Прислал детальные фото. Я всё сделал, отправил результаты. Сижу, курю и думаю, будить ли человека в три часа ночи с новостью о том, что у него в школе лежит неразорвавшийся снаряд, или до утра подождать? И так с ВОВ лежит, может, до утра потерпит...

14 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC162 viewsread 15 November 2026

Все вокруг только и твердили, что жизнь вместе с парнем превратит меня в домашнюю клушу. Конечно, я говорила, что такое со мной не случится. И. . . . я оказалась права! )Жизнь вдвоём — это нечто! Мы ведём себя как довольные дети) Конечно, проблемы есть. Но это мелочи) У нас абсолютное равноправие во всём. В быту, в деньгах, в обязанностях. Никто не ущемлён и каждому комфортно. Я счастлива, и как же я рада, что не пов…

14 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC180 viewsread 15 November 2026

Я онколог. Первая жена моего мужа болела онкологией. Часто на дежурствах видела их, думала, какой симпатичный муж у этой пациентки. Но никогда ни взглядом, ни словом не позволяла себе это показать. Уехала надолго на учёбу в другой город. Эта женщина умерла у нас в отделении. Где-то через месяц моя пациентка, живущая с тем мужчиной в одном подъезде, подбросила ему записку с моим номером в почту. Живём уже 7 лет, но на…

14 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC190 viewsread 15 November 2026

Многим интересно что будет, если ударить по кнопке «Нажать при пожаре». Так вот, будучи в детском лагере, я рискнула на это дело. В здании заработала сигнализация (5 этажей), весь корпус эвакуировали, приехали пожарные, скорая, полиция. С управляющих сняли штраф за ложный вызов. Долго искали виноватого, а я с подругами обсуждала, каким идиотом нужно быть чтобы сделать такую глупость :)

14 Nov 2026, 05:00 UTC199 viewsread 15 November 2026

Муж моей подруги ум@р от рака. Его дети долго писали ему СМС-сообщения о том, как они поживают. Номер передали другому абоненту, и он начал отвечать. Отвечал на каждое сообщение, так как понял, что к чему . Подбадривал их, писал в ответ очень хорошие слова. Когда их мама узнала, то решила позвонить. Говорили они по телефону до утра. Встретились. Спустя почти пять лет она выходит замуж, дети его называют папа-два, он…

Showing the 12 most recent of 351 posts we hold for @Sp_letnica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Sp_letnica edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sплетница” (@Sp_letnica), 8,533 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sp_letnica.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.