Channel name was changed to «РЕСТ - 風の歌»

Channel
РЕСТ - 風の歌
@Song_of_the_wind_group
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003759088487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Song_of_the_wind_group |
| Description | 風の歌 — н᧐ʙᥲя κᥲʙᥱρ ᴦρуᥰᥰᥲ, κ᧐ᴛ᧐ρᥲя δудᥱᴛ ᥰρ᧐дʙᥙᴦᥲᴛьᥴя δᥱᤋ κ᧐ⲙᥰᥲнᥙᥙ и ᥰ᧐κ᧐ρᥙт ᥴ᧘уɯᥲᴛᥱ᧘ᥱᥔ ᥴʙ᧐ᥙⲙᥙ нᥲʙыκᥲⲙᥙ。 𝟹 ᧐чᥲρ᧐ʙᥲᴛᥱ᧘ьны᥊ учᥲᥴᴛнᥙцы: 𐌑᧐κᥲ — 𐌑᧐ⲙ᧐ Vᥲiᴛᥱr — 𐍃ᥲᥒᥲ 𑀥᧐ᥣᥣᥲ — 𐌑iᥒᥲ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 18 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Song_of_the_wind_group |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 16
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5352750090974929602 | 9 | 19.1% | |
| custom 5267509562973387666 | 8 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5215211713305019463 | 7 | 14.9% | |
| custom 5215711046202849003 | 7 | 14.9% | |
| custom 5345987334254919464 | 7 | 14.9% | |
| custom 5199938874024952901 | 5 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5452167928063482850 | 4 | 8.51% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
@Coeur_group 💕 = 𝓃ℯ𝓌 𝒹𝓊ℴ 𝓌𝒾𝓉𝒽… 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ℋ𝓎𝓊𝓃𝓁𝒾𝓍 𝓅𝓇ℴ𝓉ℴ𝓉𝓎𝓅ℯ ℋ𝓌𝒶𝓃 ℋ𝓎𝓊𝓃𝒿𝒾𝓃&ℒℯℯ ℱℯ𝓁𝒾𝓍 — «У каждой Луны должно быть своё Солнце - тот, чей свет она будет отражать, когда в мире станет слишком темно, и тот, ради кого она будет ждать своего часа в бескрайней пустоте неба». 🎀 🎀 ➡️ 𝒩ℴ𝓊𝓈 𝓈ℴ𝓂𝓂ℯ𝓈 𝒾𝒸𝒾 #Cœur
🐍Извините,но ваше мнение мало кого ебёт
𐌏ᥴуждᥲᥱⲙ ᴛᥲκ᧐ᥱ。
💄Извините,но Вэйтер хуйня
🤩aomи cra͜sh sheet🔤 🤩olo 🫶 @yugosolo ✅ @mari_solooo ✅ @Hori_the_best ✅ @VaiterSolo ✅ 🤩roup 🤩 @exile_group_oi ✅ @rewerzgroup ✅ @glowi_oi ✅ @harlots_o1 ✅ @bloodlust_oi ✅ @easyhard_g ✅ 🤩uo 🔥 @Song_of_the_wind_group ✅ @newgrouplove ✅ 🤩ompany 💖 @moonlebels ✅ @Serm_ENTR000 ✅ @KEMIZ_label ✅ @WILLILABEL ✅ 🤩ournalists 🐾 @minashkaomg ✅
🩷іᥒ𝗍ᥱrᥲᥴ𝗍і᥎ᥱ💚 (ᴸ🐿) ┌┈✷◎்۫۫✵┈┈❃۬◦۪۪┄┐ Честное мнение об ои канале (проводит Лиса) https://t.me/Song_of_the_wind_group Увидела вас в пиар чате, оформа прекрасная, еще от вас веет вайбом Японии П. С Мока моя Биаска, но другие девочки тоже огонь └┄❃۬◦۪۪┈┈✷◎்۫۫✵┈┘ с нетерпением ждем ваши каналы в комм ʷᵃᶦᵗ ʸᵒᵘʳ ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡˢ ᶦⁿ ᶜᵒᵐ ˢˢ•ᶜᵒᵐ @lilix_officiall
custom 52157110462028490034custom 51999388740249529011custom 52675095629733876661custom 53459873342549194641
Sticker, posted without a caption
Тᥱᥰᥱρь нᥲ Y᧐ᥙTᥙδᥱ ⲙᥙsiᥴ ʙы ᥴⲙ᧐жᥱᴛᥱ ᥰρ᧐ᥴ᧘уɯᥲᴛь «風の歌 ᥰ᧐ ⲙнᥱнᥙю ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴчᥙκ᧐ʙ», ᥴ᧐ᥴᴛᥲʙ᧘ᥱнныᥔ ʙᥲⲙᥙ ʙ κ᧐ⲙⲙᥱнᴛᥲρᥙя᥊。Еᥴ᧘ᥙ жᥱ᧘ᥲᥱᴛᥱ д᧐δᥲʙᥙᴛь чᴛ᧐-нᥙδудь ᥱщё, ᴛ᧐ ᥰᥙɯᥙᴛᥱ ʙ κ᧐ⲙⲙᥱнᴛᥲρᥙя᥊ {ⲙы ᤋᥲⲙᥱᴛᥙⲙ ʙᥴᥱ᥊}。
custom 51999388740249529011custom 52152117133050194631custom 52157110462028490031custom 52675095629733876661custom 53459873342549194641custom 53527500909749296021custom 54521679280634828501
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53527500909749296021
𐌿᧐чᥱⲙу ʙᥲɯ нᥙκᴛ᧐ нᥱ ᥰ᧐нρᥲʙᥙ᧘ᥴя, ʙы ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛᥱ нᥲᥰᥙᥴᥲᴛь чᥱρᥱᤋ ᥲн᧐нᥙⲙныᥱ ᥴ᧐᧐δщᥱнᥙя: @SongOfTheWine_bot
🤩ы услышали полноценные практики наших участниц。Поменялось ли ваше мнение после тизера? Чей голос и навыки понравились больше?
- Moka41%
- Vaiter32%
- Dolla23%
- Никто18%
- Моя кнопка14%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Song_of_the_wind_group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤩ы услышали полноценные практики наших участниц。Поменялось ли ваше мнение после тизера? Чей голос и навыки понравились больше?
- Moka41%
- Vaiter32%
- Dolla23%
- Никто18%
- Моя кнопка14%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤩ак вам навыки нашей Доллы?
- 100/1043%
- 10/10, но есть, над чем работать52%
- 0/1017%
- Моя кнопка4%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤩ак вам навыки нашей Vaiter?
- 100/1043%
- 10/10, но есть, над чем работать43%
- 0/1019%
- Моя кнопка5%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 25 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@harlots_o1 · 841 post🍓ꑄυϐׁꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅ_օí(ʂ᥆ᥣ᥆)
@Hori_the_best · 91 postПЕРЕЕЗД #. . 𝗞𝗘𝗠𝕴𝗭 𝗟𝗔𝕭𝗘𝗟 [ ?? ]
@KEMIZ_label · 851 postⲙⲁrⲓ.
@mari_solooo · 451 postРЕСТ𝙈𝙄𝙉𝘼ʲᵒᵘʳᶰᵃᶫᶦˢᵗ
@minashkaomg · 661 post෫ׅㅤ𝓜᥆ꪮñ ᥣׁׅ֪ꫀׁׅᑲє𝒍 🍡̨ᩙ𖹭᭢
@moonlebels · 1631 post"ᏚᎬᏒᎷ"ᴇnᴛᴇrᴛᴀinʍᴇnᴛ"
@Serm_ENTR000 · 1991 post𝞈ı𝗹𝗹ı 𝗹𐐼𝗯ׅ𝝴ׅ𝗹 / 🩷
@WILLILABEL · 4431 post``𝗬𝘂𝗴𝗼 𝘀𝗼#𝗹𝗼. .
@Yugosolo · 1131 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РЕСТ - 風の歌” (@Song_of_the_wind_group), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Song_of_the_wind_group.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.