Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MEME CALLS - SOL

@SolanaScanner

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,300subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002019065172
TypeChannel
Username@SolanaScanner
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SolanaScanner

Growth

10,30010,34210,3217 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,339 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,336 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,325 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,318 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,315 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,300 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,294–10,348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:4510,300-15
12 Aug 2026, 10:1410,315-3
11 Aug 2026, 06:3810,318-7
10 Aug 2026, 04:3510,325-11
9 Aug 2026, 01:1110,336-3
7 Aug 2026, 22:5210,339-3
7 Aug 2026, 18:0110,342no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:4910,342first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.14%
avg views ÷ 10,300 subscribers
Avg views / post
529
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
34
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held36 (6 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total16,406
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC380 viewsread 13 August 2026

Most people are still sleeping on high MC plays because they only watch low MC coins. Early rotations create the biggest winners. It’s never about how low the market cap is it’s always about timing your entry!

10 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC380 viewsread 13 August 2026

Aped $MANLET here at 3M market cap CA: HxQhDGYqyjorgogMJx7YbBHADEDxuHhLnMMmr6VYpyn Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/bneed53wyjj8qfheztbuxyc1el1cqv5hlb5h6ykgn7eo

9 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC614 viewsread 13 August 2026

Bitcoin is currently undervalued after a tough year of underperformance, with a still-healthy decentralized network, exhausted sellers, and most risks (like DAT overhangs and quantum threats) already priced in Suggests DCA into spot BTC or hedging via cheap options while long-term holders accumulate

9 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC614 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Also still in $PIPEDOG since $30m Trading it for a 2x on size Chart looking super good and hearing rumours the team is super stacked. Had a KuCoin listing last week too. Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xb7f10f74b39291b9290b779978e19a7637c742d6

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @SolanaScanner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

Let’s call some bullish Robinhood plays 👀

  1. Yes63%
  2. No6%
  3. Only sol plays50%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 486,080 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MEME CALLS - SOL” (@SolanaScanner), 10,300 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SolanaScanner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.