Channel
@SolSqueezer
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,457subscribers
+475 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001702400974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SolSqueezer |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SolSqueezer |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 2,457 | +209 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 2,248 | +195 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 2,053 | +94 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 1,959 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 1,964 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 1,969 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 1,973 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 1,978 | -13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 1,991 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:39 | 1,988 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 1,983 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 1,981 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 1,982 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 1,982 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
NO WALLET LIST? START WITH A TOKEN Wallet research does not always start with a list of addresses. Sometimes it makes more sense to start with a token that already moved: - who entered early - who exited with profit - who still holds supply - which wallets actually made money on the move. Token Analysis in SolSqueezer turns one token into a source of new wallets. You can see not only earliest buyers, but also top t…
High PnL is where wallet analysis starts, not where it ends. The real edge comes from filtering out one-hit wallets before they turn into one-hit mistakes. Bot for wallet analysis: @solsqueezer_bot
YOUR FILTERS ARE YOUR STRATEGY There is no single “correct” filter setup in wallet research. One trader looks for wallets with a high win rate and calmer hold time. Another hunts for high ROI and accepts more noise. A third one immediately removes wallets with buy sizes they cannot realistically copy. 👕 That is why filters are not just settings. They reflect your strategy: the risk you are willing to take, the trad…
50 SOLSCAN TABS IS NOT A STRATEGY Manual wallet research often looks like this: open Solscan, check a few trades, jump into tokens, open more addresses, save screenshots, then try to rebuild the full picture in a spreadsheet. The problem is that you see fragments, not the system: 1️⃣ You may find a good trade but miss that the wallet is no longer active. 2️⃣ See high PnL but not notice it came from one token. 3️⃣…
TOP 1 WALLET OF THE WEEK 💫 Wallet: 3ohRETLVMydDXVyEUgMeLnjqTgvN2GFoLwgeZBUxRzs8 This wallet scored 96 and took the #1 spot this week, but the report marks it as Mixed: watch first. The strong part is that the result does not look like one random trade. The wallet has an: 🟣 83% win rate over 12 trades 🟣 117% median ROI, 287% realized ROI, and 30.44 SOL rPnL. It also caught 2 moonshots x10+ and has a median hold ti…
DON’T COPY ONE-HIT WALLETS A wallet can look strong because of one trade. 💫 For example, it catches a token at x20, and the overall PnL suddenly looks impressive. But if most other trades are flat or negative, that is not edge. That is one lucky outlier. For copy trading, the key is not the brightest trade, but repeatable behavior. Check whether profit is spread across different tokens, whether there is enough tra…
WALLETS TO AVOID IN COPY TRADING Sometimes a wallet looks strong in the report, but is not a good copy target. Not because it is “bad”, but because its trades are hard to reproduce in real conditions. If a wallet holds positions for less than a minute, your copy bot may enter at a very different price. If one trade is built through 5–10 buy transactions, your average entry and risk can differ from the original. 📎 T…
WHAT MAKES A WALLET COPYABLE? A good wallet for copy trading is not just a wallet with high PnL. You need to look at the full metric stack: 🟣 ROI High ROI matters, but check whether it came from one trade. 🟣 Win rate 60%+ can look strong, but only when read together with PnL structure and trade count. 🟣 Buy count If a wallet makes too many buy transactions in one trade, your copy bot may give you very different en…
How long have you been using SolSqueezer?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
WHY YOU SHOULD CHECK WHEN A WALLET BUYS A TOKEN The same PnL can hide very different scenarios. A wallet that buys before the first pump and a wallet that enters after a strong move are not the same. The first may be finding early entries. The second may be playing momentum, but if you copy it, you often get a worse price and a different risk/reward. That is why you should not only check whether the wallet made mo…
MEDIAN ROI: THE FILTER AGAINST LUCKY WALLETS Average ROI can look strong because of one big trade. For example, a wallet hits x20 on one token, while most other trades are flat or negative. Average ROI gets pulled up, but that does not mean the strategy is repeatable. 💫 Median ROI gives a different view of the wallet. It shows the “middle” trade result, so one extreme winner has less impact on the overall picture. …
STOP COPYING SCREENSHOTS. START CHECKING WALLETS. Telegram and X are full of screenshots from one good trade: clean entry, nice multiplier, big profit. But a screenshot does not show what happened before or after. ‼️ It will not show how many trades the wallet closed in red, its real win rate, how often it trades, position size, holding behavior, or whether it simply caught one good token. A screenshot is a moment…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SolSqueezer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How long have you been using SolSqueezer?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SolSqueezer” (@SolSqueezer), 2,457 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SolSqueezer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.