Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سهراب سپهری

Channel

سهراب سپهری

@Sohrab_Sepehrei

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,753subscribers

+86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001246491020
TypeChannel
Username@Sohrab_Sepehrei
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sohrab_Sepehrei

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,66516,76716,7166 August 2026 — 16,667 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,667 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,669 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,672 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,669 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,677 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,683 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,674 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,672 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,665 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,675 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,685 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,696 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,692 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,689 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,698 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,703 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,714 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,713 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,714 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,719 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,721 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,724 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,723 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,720 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,711 subscribers7 September 2026 — 16,706 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,700 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,703 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,704 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,701 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,695 subscribers2 October 2026 — 16,696 subscribers7 October 2026 — 16,705 subscribers11 October 2026 — 16,727 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,746 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,742 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,736 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,746 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,747 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,749 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,745 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,749 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,747 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,746 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,751 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,756 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,755 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,758 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,752 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,751 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,753 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,754 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,758 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,759 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,767 subscribers6 November 2026 — 16,762 subscribers7 November 2026 — 16,759 subscribers8 November 2026 — 16,753 subscribers16,7536 August 20268 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 94 days, net +86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,650–16,782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 16:5616,753-6
7 Nov 2026, 10:3716,759-3
6 Nov 2026, 12:1816,762-5
5 Nov 2026, 08:5816,767+8
4 Nov 2026, 06:5616,759+1
3 Nov 2026, 08:1616,758+4
1 Nov 2026, 06:1716,754+1
31 Oct 2026, 03:4916,753+2
30 Oct 2026, 05:0816,751-1
29 Oct 2026, 08:3116,752-6
28 Oct 2026, 05:5816,758+3
27 Oct 2026, 03:4816,755-1
26 Oct 2026, 05:2016,756+5
25 Oct 2026, 08:2016,751+5
24 Oct 2026, 10:4816,746-1
23 Oct 2026, 12:4516,747-2
22 Oct 2026, 09:4016,749+4
21 Oct 2026, 04:2916,745-4
20 Oct 2026, 04:5616,749+2
19 Oct 2026, 02:4016,747first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.64%
avg views ÷ 16,753 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held55 (27 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total8,681
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,255 reactions across 53 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,13190.1%
🔥483.82%
👍453.59%
😢231.83%
🤩40.319%
😱20.159%
🎉10.08%
👎10.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,308 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC980 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_بیست‌و‌پنجم -- اما در مینیاتور تلفیق هرمی هست. ریتم هست. رنگ‌های مکمل هست. _ هست، ولی به سایه عقل و آگاهی هستی نیافته است. به همین رو، گاه رنگی، سازمان رنگیِ پرده را از هم می‌پاشد. و گاه شاخه شکوفه باری بیش از هسته موضوع چشم را می‌گیرد. و اصولا هسته موضوع در کار نگارگر ما نیست. هم از این روست که کانون تماشا به پردهٔ وی جا ندارد. دیگر چیرهایی که برای هنرور ما مفهومی ندارند پرسپکتیو است، …

❤10

6 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC901 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

هر تکان دست ما با جنبش یک بال مجذوب سِحر می‌خواند جیب‌های ما صدای جیک‌جیک صبح‌های کودکی می‌داد ... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

❤11👍4

4 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,480 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_بیست‌و‌چهارم چهره‌گشای مینیاتور تلفیق نمی‌کند. در نگارگری خاور دور، تلفیق، کار اساسی نگارگر است. صورتگر چینی دوران سونگ دانش تلفیق را به کمال دارد. صورت آرای ژاپنی نیز این دانش آموخته‌است. سوتاتسو استاد بی‌بدیل تلفیق است. اما پرده‌ساز ما رهبر عنصر تکنواز پردهٔ خود است، نه رهبر گروه عناصر همساز پردهٔ خویش. نقشبند ما نقشی به کنار نقش می‌زند. میان عناصر پرده او بستگی ارگانیک کمتر است. پیوند…

❤17

4 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,330 views26 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

و من چه بیهوده مکان را می‌کاوم ... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

❤20😢5🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 05:33 UTC≈2,010 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_بیست‌و‌سوم مینیاتور ما را تلفیق عقلی نیست. صورتگر مینیاتور «بت‌های ذهن» خود را جدا جدا در پرده می‌نشاند. مکان این بت‌ها یگانه نیست. هرکدام به جایی دیگر می‌نشیند. زبان یکدیگر را نمی‌دانند. و مکالمه‌ای در میان نیست. وقتی که نقشی به سپیدی پرده آمد، چشم به راه نقش دیگر نیست. تنهایی خود را پذیراست. جویبار در مسیر «انفسی» خود جاری است. دست آدم نزدیک بدان نمی‌رسد. و از تری آن بهره نمی‌گیرد. چون…

❤17👍1

3 Nov 2026, 05:33 UTC≈1,980 views26 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

از روزن آن سوها بنگریم در به نوازشِ خطر بگشاییم خودْروی دلهره پرپر کنیم نیاویزیم نه به بندِ گریز نه به دامانِ پناه نشتابیم نه به سوی روشن نزدیک نه به سمت مبهم دور ... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

❤22🔥3👍1

29 Sept 2026, 17:46 UTC≈5,750 views22 reactionsread 8 November 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_بیست‌و‌دوم -- در هنر مجردنگاری غرب، کمتر به جای ویژه پرده اشارت رفته‌است. _ در هنر نوین غرب، بیشترینه، هر جا پای معنی به میان آید، هرجا اشراق رخ نماید، هرجا کشف و شهود به کار باشد، هسته تماشا در پرده هست. این هسته در کار کله هست، در پرده سورا نیست. در نگارگری شاگال هست، در نقشبندی لوژه نیست. در دفتر نُت و میوه‌های براک هست، در سرور زندگی ماتیس نیست. -- این امر را کلیتی چندان نیست: وان …

❤19🔥3

29 Sept 2026, 17:46 UTC≈5,480 views44 reactionsread 8 November 2026

میانِ ملت‌های مختلف بوده‌ام. به هیچ قومی نشانِ شایستگی نداده‌ام. آدم‌ها وقتی برای من وجود دارند که از پلّه خاصی از شعور بالاتر رفته‌باشند. خوب و بدشان را با معیار معرفت می‌سنجم. دنبال خوب نمی‌گردم. آدم خوب یعنی آدم با شعور و آگاه. بخشی از نامهٔ #سهراب_سپهری به دوستش شاهی نیویورک، ۳۱ دسامبر ۱۹۷۰ @Sohrab_Sepehrei

❤41👍3

24 Sept 2026, 11:29 UTC≈6,080 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_بیست‌و‌یکم -- اما در نیمهٔ سدهٔ نوزدهم، وقتی که دریافت تحلیلی طبیعت جانشین دریافت مکانیکی جهان شد، و هنر به کشف اجزاء دست یافت، یکجاگرایی از چشم افتاد. طبیعت در کاررنوار نزدیک آمد. کوه سزان ملموس شد. آدم پرده اعتبار دیرین از کف داد. چیزی شد در حد عناصر دیگر. در پرده ... مونه چیزی را جلوه ویژه نیست. در کاروان گوگ احساس کلی اثر مدّنظر است (چون در پردهٔ کرانه رود). سورا تمامی پرده را به موش…

❤18

24 Sept 2026, 11:29 UTC≈5,100 views45 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

در درهٔ آفتاب سر بر گرفته‌ای کنار بالش تو بید سایه‌فکن از پا در آمده‌است ... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

❤42🔥3

18 Sept 2026, 14:36 UTC≈5,370 views40 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

به شکلِ خلوت خود بود و عاشقانه‌ترین انحنای وقت خودش را برای آینه تفسیر کرد ... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

❤38🔥2

18 Sept 2026, 14:36 UTC≈6,250 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_بیستم -- میان غربیان، دورر نیز به همه چیز نگرش یکسان داشت. با همان نازک بینی پروانه‌ای را رقم می‌زدند که سنگی را و پوست درختی را و پرنده‌ای را. _ دورر به اشیاء برون با تأمل یکسان می‌نگرد، نقشبند ما به صور درون. دورر مجذوب دردمند طبیعت است، چهره پرداز ما عاشق شیدای «بت‌های ذهنی» خویش. در کار دورر تلخی و اندوه است، در ساخته گارگر ما ستایش نور. اما شما خود به او خرده گرفته‌اید که چرا اهل …

❤13👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @Sohrab_Sepehrei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شعر نو
@sheereno · 39,600
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
" هوشنگ ابتهاج "
@hoshang_ebtehhaj · 82,136
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
🔸فروغ_فرخزاد🔸
@foroghfarokhzad · 45,055
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
| فروغ_ شاملو |
@foroogh_shamloo · 51,349
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
📚 چمدان کتاب
@chamedan_ketab · 71,272
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سهراب سپهری” (@Sohrab_Sepehrei), 16,753 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sohrab_Sepehrei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.