Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سهراب سپهری

Channel

سهراب سپهری

@Sohrab_Sepehrei

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,695subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001246491020
TypeChannel
Username@Sohrab_Sepehrei
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sohrab_Sepehrei

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,66516,72416,694.56 August 2026 — 16,667 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,667 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,669 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,672 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,669 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,677 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,683 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,674 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,672 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,665 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,675 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,685 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,696 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,692 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,689 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,698 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,703 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,714 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,713 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,714 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,719 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,721 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,724 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,723 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,720 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,711 subscribers7 September 2026 — 16,706 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,700 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,703 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,704 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,701 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,695 subscribers16,6956 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,656–16,733 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:1716,695-6
16 Sept 2026, 03:5916,701-3
14 Sept 2026, 09:2016,704+1
12 Sept 2026, 15:4016,703+3
10 Sept 2026, 18:1516,700-6
7 Sept 2026, 14:5816,706-5
4 Sept 2026, 18:3916,711-9
1 Sept 2026, 21:2316,720-3
31 Aug 2026, 19:2616,723-1
30 Aug 2026, 21:0916,724+3
30 Aug 2026, 00:3416,721+2
28 Aug 2026, 23:3616,719+5
26 Aug 2026, 23:3316,714+1
26 Aug 2026, 01:0716,713-1
24 Aug 2026, 22:1416,714+11
23 Aug 2026, 11:3816,703+5
21 Aug 2026, 20:1416,698+9
20 Aug 2026, 13:3616,689-3
19 Aug 2026, 12:1816,692-4
18 Aug 2026, 09:2216,696first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 16,695 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,950
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held41 (27 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total3,900
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

866 reactions across 39 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
77990.0%
🔥323.70%
👍313.58%
😢161.85%
🤩40.462%
😱20.231%
🎉10.115%
👎10.115%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 919 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,990 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_هجدهم _ دگا باسمه‌های ژاپنی را دیده بود. از فضای باز نقاش شرق دور و تلفیق ویژه آن در درس آموخته‌بود. باری، «شمایل هندی همه میدان دید را یکجا پر می‌کند. همه چیز یکسان روشن است و به گونه هم اصلی. چشم از نقطه‌ای به نقطه دیگر راه نمی‌پیماید، آن‌سان که در بینش تجربی. و تمرکز معنی را در یک بخش پیش از بخش دیگر نمی‌جوید، آن‌گونه که در هنر بیشتر "نمایشی".» -- به نقاشی ایران می‌‌رسیم. _ نقاش ایر

19

24 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,910 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

در باغ ناتمام تو، ای کودک ! شاخسار زمرد تنها نبود بر زمینه هولی می‌درخشید... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

26

18 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈3,120 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_هفدهم -- دالته نیز در Convivio می‌سراید: «همه چیز در خود دوست داشتنی است، و هیچ چیز کراهت‌آور نیست.» _ اکهارت هم چنین اشارتی دارد: «آن که به چشمش خدا در یک چیز گرامی‌تر است تا در چیز دیگر، چنین کس وحشی است.» ژاپنی در پس گذرا بودن نیلوفر و پایداری کاج چیزی یکسان می‌بیند: «نیلوفر ساعتی شکفته می‌ماند، اما در باطن با کاج، که هزار سال می‌پاید، فرقی ندارد.» چینی به جهان یکسان می‌نگرد. چوانگ ت

17

18 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈2,660 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

در غم گداختم ای بزرگ ای تابان! سر بزن شبِ زیست را در هم ریز ستارهٔ دیگرِ خاک !... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

18🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC≈3,050 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_شانزدهم -- به دیواره درون دهلیز بر و بودور برجسته_نگاره‌ای است که غسل بودا را پیش از ایراد نخستین خطابه قلم زده است. در این نگاره، بودا همسنگ دیگران پیکر گرفته‌است، با این همه صورت چشم‌ربای نگاره است. _ زیرا که نشسته‌است، و دیگران به پا هستند. آنجا دگرگونی نهاد است که نگاره را از آنِ خود می‌کند. اما در پردهٔ لئوناردو، مسیح نهادی دیگر ندارد. اینجا همه نشسته‌اند. تلفیق کار به گونه‌ای است

15🔥2🤩1

16 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC≈2,610 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

کنارِ قبر انتظار چه بیهوده‌ است!... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

30🔥3😢3👍2

13 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈3,290 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_پانزدهم _ باز هم چیزی مرا به گذشت. استاد، یک بار روی «طبیعت بی‌جان»ی کار می‌کردم. چشم شما به کارم افتاد. گفتید چند رنگ آن را از شدت بیندازم و زرد لیمویی را تندی دهم تا چشم را به آنجا کشانم. من هم چنان کردم. اما، استاد، چرا باید در پرده ما جایی باشد چشمگیر؟ -- در پرده همه‌چیز را جایی یکسان و مقامی برابر نیست. _ در پردهٔ ما هست. در پردهٔ ما شرقیان. غربی می‌سنجد. برمی‌گزیند. در گزینش فدا

14🎉1

13 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,830 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

من رفته او رفته ما بی ما شده بود زیبایی تنها شده بود ! #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

24🔥4

12 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈3,150 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_چهاردهم -- هنرمندان مجردنگار غرب به هنر ذن چشم داشته‌اند. و پاره‌ای ذن آموخته‌اند. تابی به خطاطی خاور دور رو کرده است. _ و نیز هانری میشو در قلمرو ادب. و شاعران غربی بسیار، هایکو سروده‌اند. اما سرشت شرقی را باید شناخت. شرقی از درون به زندگی می‌رسد. نقاش ذن با طبیعت می‌جوشد و همدلی می‌کند. به خیزران و پرنده بدل می‌شود، پس خیزران و پرنده می‌کِشد. ژاپنی اهل «تنهایی ابدی» است. پرورده «سابی»

13

12 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈2,760 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

چه درونم تنهاست ... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

6👍2🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC≈3,100 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

گفتگو با استاد فصل سوم #قسمت_سیزدهم -- نزدیکید به این سخن اکهارت: «ناچیزترین چیز اگر در خدا دیده شود، مثلا گلی در خدا به مشاهده در آید، چیزی است از عالم به کمال نزدیک‌تر.» _ اکهارت به شرق ما نزدیکی شگفت دارد. -- از فرو هشتن عقل و چشم‌پوشی از نقش بیرون و روان داشتن قلم حرف می‌رفت. از آنچه راه و رسم هنر و مجرّدنمای غرب بود. در هنر مجرّدنما ظواهر عینی را جای نیست. عقلِ بیدار را فرصت جولان نیست، کشف و شهود را مجال بر

12

11 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈2,850 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ای وزش شور ای شدیدترین شکل! سایهٔ لیوانِ آب را تا عطشِ این صداقت متلاشی راهنمایی کن... #سهراب_سپهری @Sohrab_Sepehrei

35🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @Sohrab_Sepehrei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شعر نو
@sheereno · 39,667
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
" هوشنگ ابتهاج "
@hoshang_ebtehhaj · 82,611
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
🔸فروغ_فرخزاد🔸
@foroghfarokhzad · 45,058
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
| فروغ_ شاملو |
@foroogh_shamloo · 51,837
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
📚 چمدان کتاب
@chamedan_ketab · 74,022
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سهراب سپهری” (@Sohrab_Sepehrei), 16,695 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sohrab_Sepehrei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.