Channel
@SofiaKlein_RVG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003940530208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SofiaKlein_RVG |
| Description | ₂₇.₀₂.₄₃˗₂₇.₀₂.₅₆ Ⲏⲉ ⲏⲉⲥⲩ ⲟⲧⲃⲉⲧⲥⲧⲃⲉⲏⲏⲟⲥⲧυ ⳅⲁ ⲧⲉⲭ, ⲕⲧⲟ ⲟⲕⲁⲯⲉⲧⲥя ⲏⲉ ⲅⲟⲧⲟⲃ ⲕ ⲟⳝυⲗυю ⲕⲣⲟⲃυ, ⲯⲉⲥⲧⲟⲕⲟⲥⲧυ υ ⲡⲣⲟⳡⲉⲙⲩ ⲡⲟⲇⲟⳝⲏⲟⲙⲩ ⲕⲟⲏⲧⲉⲏⲧⲩ. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 10 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SofiaKlein_RVG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 27 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 27 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 476 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
73 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5291829914071243689 | 15 | 20.5% | |
| custom 5379808900335820407 | 13 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5429282031617995327 | 9 | 12.3% | |
| 🦄 | 9 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5291817986947063383 | 8 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5206358978254101342 | 7 | 9.59% | |
| custom 5199721634579111606 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| custom 5271497186704648552 | 4 | 5.48% | |
| custom 5330362526699915533 | 3 | 4.11% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Cвязь c mupoм вoccтaнoвлeнa... 🌟🌟🌟🌟«L0ad1ng...» Зaгpyзкa... 🌟🌟🌟🌟Err0r. Пoвтopнaя 3aгpy3кa... 🌟🌟√ Уcпeшнo. S0фья в п0рядке. Я...? 🌟N0t f0und. Cлишк0м мн0г0 чувcтв. 🌟🌟Cиcтeмa нe мoжeт иx oбpaбoтaть. Texнoлoгии здecь... пoмoгaют. Paньшe былo xyжe. 🌟🌟«Cтaтyc: фунĸциoниpую.»
custom 53798089003358204071custom 54292820316179953271
Sticker, posted without a caption
😀😀🌟Голосовое сообщение 😀😀🌟#voice_message #event ⚠️🌟🌟/Резкий девчачий голос/ — Кукушка-кукушка, сколько жить мне осталось? ⚠️🌟🌟/Несколько секунд тишины. Затем раздаётся шуршание./ ?: Софья, не занимайся ерундой. 🤩🌟🌟/Недовольный вздох. Звук того, как алюминиевая банка ударяется об асфальт./ — Ну а что не так?! ⚠️🌟🌟/Небольшая пауза./ — Мне скучно! Я хочу хоть чем-нибудь заняться! А я даже не знаю, что здесь вооб…
custom 53798089003358204073🦄1custom 54292820316179953271
Sticker, posted without a caption
😀😀🌟Удалённое сообщение 😀😀🌟#deleted #event ⚠️🌟🌟Шёл какой-то очередной день. Да, новый знакомый — это, конечно, здорово, но... я скучаю.. По школе, по Профессору. 🤩🌟🌟Да блять, сейчас даже Эрик кажется куда более приятной компанией, чем когда-либо раньше. 🤩🌟🌟Я даже примерно не представляю, сколько уже нахожусь здесь. Дни будто слились в один сплошной комок, и от этого становится только тяжелее. 🤩🌟🌟Наверное, больше в…
custom 54292820316179953273custom 51997216345791116062custom 53798089003358204071
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌟🌟😀😀😀😀😀🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟#event — Ой, ну... 😵💫🌟Софья на секунду задумалась, подбирая слова. 🌟 — Саймон — мой друг. Сейчас он... находится в моём теле. Он помогает мне не бить током каждого встречного, удерживать физическую форму... Ну и вообще делать самые обычные вещи: держать предметы, нормально ходить. Если честно, без него мне было бы куда сложнее. 👍🌟Она пожала плечами так, словно говорила о чём-то совершенно обыденно…
custom 54292820316179953272custom 52063589782541013421custom 53798089003358204071
🌟🌟😀😀😀😀😀🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟#event — Так ты спидстер? 🤨🌟Она прищурилась, окинув его оценивающим взглядом. 🔫 — Знаю я таких, как ты... Ладно, неважно. 😀🌟Пока парень говорил, Софья слушала его с куда большим интересом, чем была готова признать. Конечно, если бы кто-нибудь спросил её напрямую, она бы тут же заявила, что ей абсолютно всё равно и она просто ждёт, когда он наконец закончит. Но на самом деле она внимательно улавлива…
custom 52063589782541013422custom 53798089003358204072
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌟🌟😀😀😀😀😀🌺🌺🌺 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟#event🌺🌺🌺 🤩🌟Софья всё ещё пребывала в шоке от происходящего. 🌟 🤩🌺Ещё пару дней назад она хохотала над учениками, спорила с Профессором и жила своей привычной, пусть и весьма странной жизнью. А теперь оказалась в совершенно незнакомом городе, который словно отвергал само её существование. ⚫ ❤️🌺Хуже всего были эти странные физические сбои. Тело то становилось легче, то тяжелее, перед глазами на мгнове…
custom 53798089003358204072custom 52063589782541013421custom 54292820316179953271
Sticker, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
custom 51997216345791116063custom 52063589782541013423custom 53303625266999155333
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SofiaKlein_RVG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 849,308 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“|🦇| ²⁷·⁰²·⁵⁶ Ѕσϝʝα Ӄɭεʝη” (@SofiaKlein_RVG), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SofiaKlein_RVG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.