Channel
@SocialPollss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
184subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001210126800 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SocialPollss |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SocialPollss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:23 | 184 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 187 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 188 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 189 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 190 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:50 | 190 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2024 to 5 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Should international sanctions be imposed on nations disrupting peace talks in the Middle East?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
Do you think media coverage of Middle East conflicts influences global public opinion?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should the international community push for an investigation into Beirut's airstrikes?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you think UN peacekeepers are effective in stabilizing conflict zones like Lebanon?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you support the International Criminal Court issuing arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant over alleged war crimes in Gaza?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you believe that the Chinese Automotive Industry will surpass the European Automotive Industry by global sellings?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Since the last attack by Russia to Ukraine with a intercontinental vector, do you believe that the escalation is nearest than ever?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
According to the last decision of the president Biden to allow Ukraine to use NATO military equipments to attack the Russian territory, do you think there will be an escalation?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should more countries phase out nuclear energy, even if it increases reliance on fossil fuels for now?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Considering the evolution of the market, with manual jobs being replaced in a few years and ‘mental jobs’ becoming more specialized, do you think that courses will be more in demand than university?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is the threat of rising oil prices due to conflicts in the Middle East more critical than the need for transitioning to renewable energy?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should global sanctions on Iranian oil be enforced more strictly, even if it risks raising energy prices?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SocialPollss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Should international sanctions be imposed on nations disrupting peace talks in the Middle East?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you think media coverage of Middle East conflicts influences global public opinion?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should the international community push for an investigation into Beirut's airstrikes?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you think UN peacekeepers are effective in stabilizing conflict zones like Lebanon?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you support the International Criminal Court issuing arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant over alleged war crimes in Gaza?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you believe that the Chinese Automotive Industry will surpass the European Automotive Industry by global sellings?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2024 to 5 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SocialPolls” (@SocialPollss), 184 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SocialPollss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.