Channel
@Sochi_logic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
77subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001943569991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sochi_logic |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sochi_logic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 77 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 78 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 79 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 79 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 30 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 53.8% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 23.1% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2024 to 18 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, уже сегодня отвлечёмся от профайлинга и поднимем тему "Бытовой конфликтологии или науки включать передний ум". - Совсем не умеешь ругаться и защищать себя ? - Боишься стычек, агрессивных споров, ссор и скандалов ? - Устал быть жертвой в любом конфликте ? Приходи, будем учиться отстаивать свои интересы! Рассмотрим примитивную, семейную и корпоративную ругань, уличный или дорожный конфликты, абьюз, буллин…
🥰3
🏅👨🔬👩🔬 Нобелевская премия 2024 Вот и подведены итоги одной из самых авторитетных научных премий, и мы по традиции публикуем полный список лауреатов ⚛️Физика. Джон Хопфилд и Джеффри Хинтон – за фундаментальные разработки, позволившие развить искусственные нейронные сети, которые используются для новых открытий в физике и в повседневной жизни. 🧪Химия. Дэвид Бейкер, Демис Хассабис и Джон Джампер - за создание новых …
Сегодня немного поговорим о типологии, типах личности и зачем это всё нужно в науке о верификации лжи!
Уже 12.10. в субботу "Как распознать ложь и начать разбираться в людях?" от Клуба логического мышления. Умение выявлять ложь и разбираться в людях - поможет обрести достойного спутника, надёжных друзей, нормальную работу, сбережёт судьбу от грандиозных ошибок и может не раз спасти жизнь! Мы расширяем и дополняем нашу исследовательскую тематику. На встречах: 💡Учимся верифицировать (выявлять) обман и определять ти…
👍1
Друзья, если кто-то снимал в пятницу видео - просьба отправить сюда @Sochisosmislom . Благодарю!
Будем наблюдать, если состоится!
Напоминаем, что сегодня ночью в небе над Сочи может вспыхнуть северное сияние. Кроме того, мощные магнитные бури обрушатся на Землю в ночь на воскресенье, — ведущий специалист центра погоды «Фобос» Михаил Леус. После этого космический шторм пойдет на спад, и магнитные бури ослабнут, но продлятся до 8 октября. Подпишись на СОЧИ СО СМЫСЛОМ.
Способ иногда работает, но неприменим к использованию в обычных беседах и помните главное правило - не делать выводов по одному признаку. Всегда ищите подтверждение в совокупности знаков!
👍3
МИФ ИЛИ ПРАВДА? В одном из эпизодов сериала "Обмани меня" доктор Кэл Лайтман замечает, как человек, готовящийся дать показания в суде, касается своей шеи и делает вывод, что это признак лжи. Можно ли так делать? Хотя прикосновение к шее действительно упоминается в литературе и исследованиях по невербальной коммуникации как возможный признак дискомфорта, но утверждать по нему о лжи — это упрощение и искажение ре…
УЖЕ СЕГОДНЯ!
Если брать за приоритетный индикатор движения глаз (право - память, лево - сочинение) и кружки сняты не зеркально - я бы сказал, что реальная история или же девушка чудесная актриса.
👍1
Известная поведенческая стратегия, а главное беспройгрышная! Женщина должна работать, трудиться, прилагать усилия, чтобы выжить, как вы считаете? Подпишись на СОЧИ СО СМЫСЛОМ .
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Sochi_logic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 765,464 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Sochi_logic named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сочи клуб логического мышления” (@Sochi_logic), 77 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sochi_logic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.