Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Smin 🔌

@SminPlug

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001815659939
TypeChannel
Username@SminPlug
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SminPlug

Growth

127 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:4512no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:5412first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
117
Videos
314
Links
458

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
44s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2025 to 13 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 May 2026, 15:33 UTC1 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

25 Mar 2026, 22:50 UTC1 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @philgodlewskii4

🕳 https://rumble.com/v77k1so-next-live-tuesday-march-24th-7pm-eastern.html

👍1

1 Jan 2026, 16:12 UTC2 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @DateForum

2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣

👍1

8 Dec 2025, 13:16 UTC2 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎵 You can now become the author of your own song in just a couple of clicks. Create hits from a text description or use your own 🗣️voice to clone it. Try it for free on JGGL 👈

👍1

29 Nov 2025, 14:47 UTC2 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

What do you think about Telegram gifts? Pavel Durov often writes about them. They seem to be becoming not just beautiful animations but real collectible assets. This is especially noticeable in seasonal gifts related to Christmas and New Year. For example, Santa Hat 🎅 — one of these gifts — has already started to rise in price, and closer to the holidays its value may increase even more. 🎅🎅🎅🎅🎅🎅🎅🎅🎅 If you want to ge

👍1

21 Nov 2025, 16:08 UTC2 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

☝️😯 JGGL are preparing a musical revolution

👍1

29 Oct 2025, 20:42 UTC3 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🚨 BREAKING News 🚨 : Massive fire spotted at roof of Soho Building in Manhattan, New York

22 Aug 2025, 12:25 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @DurovMemNFTSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍1

9 Aug 2025, 21:58 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @DateForum

Posted without readable text

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SminPlug. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 851,095 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Smin 🔌” (@SminPlug), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SminPlug.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.