Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
11,000 average views per post against 12,551 subscribers — an engagement rate of 88.0%. Across the 7,490 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,611 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.83% and 17.6%, with a median of 8.86%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
143,640
Mature posts only
90.2% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 6 days, net -293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,468–12,849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 08:37
12,512
-39
12 Aug 2026, 11:25
12,551
-38
11 Aug 2026, 13:34
12,589
-70
10 Aug 2026, 16:06
12,659
-30
9 Aug 2026, 19:41
12,689
-33
8 Aug 2026, 21:45
12,722
-47
8 Aug 2026, 00:43
12,769
-33
7 Aug 2026, 03:31
12,802
-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:45
12,805
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:39
12,805
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
88.4%
avg views ÷ 12,512 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,100
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
21 (22 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
143,840
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
آپدیت پست مهر 1404، برای چارت 96 سالهی انس طلا به نقره
هم چون گذشته، به آنان از آینده خبر داده شد و این آینده متعلق به طلا خواهد بود، باشد که رستگار شوید
@Smart_Money_Trend
نسخه حرفهای تر از پست عمومی، نمای کندلی و نزدیکتر این چارت انحصاری صد سالهی طلا به نقره هست
👌دیدی این یک ماه چطور تب نقره داغ شده بود، دیدی با ریزش 20 درصدی طلا نقره بیش از 40 درصد ریخت، حالا ببین چه کندل برگشتی زد و میبینی چطور چندتا صندوق سوپر حبابی نقره رو به ملت انداختن
چارت و مسیر شماتیک زرد تقریبی هست و کمی از مسیر شماتیک پایینتر اومد ولی در ادامه👇
بعد 10ماه، وقتشه که بازی به نفع طلا بچرخه که سالها بعد صد…
👌نمودار نسبی طلا به نقره طی 95 سال اخیر که بعیده تا الان جایی دیده باشید
از سال 68 مدام بازدهی طلا به نقره بیشتر شده و اهمیت پولهای درشت، اینجا خودش رو نشون میده، ممکنه در کوتاه مدت به خاطر رشد نقره، این مسیر شماتیک زرد، در قالب یک شکست فیک روی خط آبی رخ بده👇
ولی اون نوار سبز که یک قرن جلوی رشد بیشتر طلا رو گرفته این سری شکسته میشه، چارت ماهانه هست و برای دیدن نتایج تحلیل باید سالانه صبر کرد
خواستم پیشاپیش بگم که…
نمای نزدیک پست 26 تیر
✅بلاخره یه روزی متوجه میشی که ترید صحیح در بورس ایران، به کمک تکنیکال، بنیاد، تابلو و حتی خبر حاصل نمیشه
برای درک روند این بازار کم عمق، سالها تجربه نیاز هست تا بازی خوانی بلد باشی، هر سری چیز جدیدی رو میکنه ولی کارت های تو دستش نامتناهی نیست و تمرکزت رو موهومات عوام پسند بند بالا نباشه، فریب نخواهی خورد، پارادوکس بعد از بازگشایی رو که یادت نرفته!
⚠️امیدوارم در این آخرین رالی بزرگ بورس ایرا…
👈از سال 92 و حتی قبلتر از اون تا پیک 99، هرباری که شاخص کل از سقف قبلی عبور میکرد، نهایتأ یک پولبک به محدودهی سقف قبلی میزد
👈از ریزش 99، سه بار این موضوع برای فلشهای نارنجی، آبی و قرمز نقض شد و اگه یادتون بیاد مخصوصا در پیک 1402، بر جماعت شرطی شده بر گذشته که باور داشتند مثل گذشته شکست سقف تاریخی یک تریگر قطعی هست، رکب زد
سوال اینه وضعیت بعد فلش سبز چه خواهد شد؟ نمیتونم با قطعیت بگم اما تجربه نشون داده که اکثری…
تاریخ نگارش پست قبل، 24مهر1403میباشد
👌روند رو به افزایش نقدینگی طی چندسال اخیر یکی از شواهد اقتصادی بود که پیش بینی اون نیاز به دانش بالایی در زمینه اقتصاد داشت و انتخابات آمریکا، دو جنگ، چندین شبه جنگ، محاصره و...، بخشی از شواهد غیراقتصادی بود که برای درک قبل از رخدادش، نیاز به دانش بالاتری در زمینه سیاست داشت
✅طی 475 روز سکه 4 برابر شد و قطعا از الان 1500 روز تا دیدن سکه 500 میلیونی باقی نمانده و البته که مهر 14…
1⃣حدود 2611 روز طول کشید که سکه از 500 تومن، بشه 5 میلیون و 10 برابر بشه
2⃣حدود 2191 روز طول کشید که سکه باز 10 برابر بشه تا دو روز پیش، بشه 50 میلیون
جمیع شواهد و داده های اقتصادی و غیر اقتصادی به من اطمینان میده👇
3⃣قطعا 2191 روز طول نخواهد کشید تا سکه بشه 500 میلیون
حالا چقدر زودترش رو نمیدونم و مهمم نیست و در کل برای بورس سکه ملاک نیست، چون بخشی از رشد سکه ناشی از انس بوده👇
بلکه این دلار هست که باید با این نگ…
👌طی دو ماه اخیر این سهم شارپترین رشد بازار رو داشته، در حالی که در ماه اول خبر مثبتی در کار نبوده و طبیعی هست که بعد چنین رشدی نیاز به اصلاح داشته باشه
👈ولی به گواه حجم، غیر از روز بازگشایی که اکثریت منتظر تارگتهای یه وجب پایینتر یه مشت نقاش بودند و اون فلش آبی که بر اساس کندلش جماعت خبرپسند در صف فروش بودند، سهم در صفهای خرید میلیاردی قفل بود تا فلش قرمز که دورهی ریکس ریکس به پایان رسید، تریگر خرید کیلویی کف بازا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Smart_Money_Trend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روند پول هوشمند” (@Smart_Money_Trend), 12,512 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Smart_Money_Trend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
