Все доступные разборы указаны на сайте: https://new.smartastro.ru/
По всем вопросам пишите Тане: @Mozhno_Tane. С других аккаунтов мы никому не пишем!!! Будьте внимательны!
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 101 days, net +7,735. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,493–23,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 15:57
22,587
+4,634
11 Nov 2026, 20:11
17,953
+1,441
8 Nov 2026, 09:47
16,512
-15
7 Nov 2026, 01:45
16,527
-7
5 Nov 2026, 23:19
16,534
+7
4 Nov 2026, 22:54
16,527
+5
4 Nov 2026, 00:35
16,522
-15
2 Nov 2026, 23:15
16,537
-9
2 Nov 2026, 02:41
16,546
-24
1 Nov 2026, 03:49
16,570
-26
30 Oct 2026, 03:51
16,596
-5
29 Oct 2026, 04:18
16,601
-18
28 Oct 2026, 05:17
16,619
+15
26 Oct 2026, 03:21
16,604
-14
25 Oct 2026, 05:26
16,618
-32
24 Oct 2026, 04:50
16,650
-22
23 Oct 2026, 02:36
16,672
-18
22 Oct 2026, 03:28
16,690
-23
20 Oct 2026, 20:49
16,713
-9
19 Oct 2026, 16:26
16,722
first reading
Engagement
128 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.3%
avg views ÷ 22,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,720
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 128 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
128 (28 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
194,320
Reactions total
7,037
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 18:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,450
Videos
≈129
Links
≈642
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,630 reactions across 123 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
13,879
56.3%
🔥
4,787
19.4%
💯
2,446
9.93%
❤🔥
2,268
9.21%
😱
812
3.30%
😎
241
0.978%
🤬
197
0.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Смотрите, как начинает выглядеть график этих влияний, если добавить туда два сложных транзита Путина, о которых я ранее писала. Впечатляет?
К слову, в начале мая 2026 года в СМИ появилась довольно громкая история о возможном заговоре против Путина.
«Важные истории», CNN и Financial Times опубликовали материалы со ссылкой на закрытый доклад разведки одной из европейских стран. Согласно документу, в Кремле с марта ус…
Я вчера выписала сложные влияния на гороскоп России на 2026-2027 год - как с точки зрения астрологической логики, так и по факту того, что они уже давали событийность в 2026 году.
Всего получилось 12 влияний.
И дальше я увидела, что в феврале-марте 2027 года кучкуются и накладываются друг на друга сразу несколько сложных транзитов, которые до этого на протяжении 2026 года были «размазаны» по времени.
То есть в это…
Помните, я говорила, что на основе событий ноября в РФ можно будет прогнозировать события февраля-марта 2027, тк местами эти периоды будут сильно похожи?
И еще вот такой пост был от 11 октября:
9 февраля - 12 апреля. Пик влияния - март и первая половина апреля.
Здесь будут события, которые повлекут за собой буквально взрыв народного недовольства. То есть, скорее всего, жестче, чем это было летом с НПЗ и чем будет в…
Новенькие, а как вы относитесь к политическим постам/прогнозам?
Дозированным - под важные новости. Они, если что, сбываются (вот недавний пример).
Интересно вам такое или нет?
Спрашиваю, тк планирую и дальше сниматься у Сережи, и мб есть смысл аудиторию по разным каналам развести.
Ответьте, плз - буду очень благодарна ❤️
❤️ - я новенький и мне интересно
😱 - я новенький и мне не интересно
🔥 - я старенький и мне и…
Давайте начнем.
В астрологии есть правило - "от большого к малому". И очень важно этому правилу следовать!
Это значит, что анализ гороскопа надо начинать с каких-то общих характеристик и "больших мазков". А дальше переходить к деталям поменьше, потом еще меньше и тд.
Дома, Лилит и тд - это как раз те самые детали, которые на начальном этапе в принципе можно игнорировать. На начальном этапе нам надо увидеть, как пр…
О, я придумала, как вас, новеньких, заинтересовать!
Давайте на примере разбора гороскопа Игоря научу вас расшифровывать свой гороскоп? Чтобы вы именно изнутри увидели астрологический символизм и его проявления в себе, а не просто чужие трактовки прочитали.
Хотите?
❤️ - да
😎 - нет
ПС: да, придется чуть поднапрячь мозги, но это очень увлекает!
Все же почитала комментарии под видео и хочу публично ответить на одну из самых популярных претензий, что было много терминов и объяснений, а они, мол, не нужны, нужны просто ответы. Об этом в том числе писали некоторые астрологи, посмотревшие выпуск.
Абсолютно не согласна.
Я считаю, что вся сила астрологии не в ее предсказательных способностях (очень сильно неоднозначных, кстати), не в навешивании категоричных ярл…
Сообщаю, что бот работает в штатном режиме 🫶🏻
Возможно, сейчас после этого поста снова начнет тормозить (если опять одновременно будет много обращений), но в таком случае попробуйте через час повторить свой запрос.
Это технические ограничения телеграма, к сожалению. Мы на них повлиять никак не можем.
И, пожалуйста, следуйте четко по шагам и отвечайте на вопросы так, как написано в примерах. Иначе он ничего вам не …
Пока бот работает с перебоями (лег из-за наплыва людей, завтра оживет), давайте дам ссылку на сайт с разборами SmartAstro: https://new.smartastro.ru/
Там скидки большие до вс включительно. Покопайтесь в списке разборов - все классные!
Если есть вопросы, пишите Тане @Mozhno_Tane
Просто "разбор натальной карты" - это разбор "Ваша натальная карта". Заказывать здесь: https://new.smartastro.ru/goroskop (всего 1000 руб…
‼️‼️ Еще раз про бота (чтобы сообщение было наверху и все увидели), и оставлю вас до утра!
Вот столько обращений за два часа - это очень много! Бот в шоке и не справляется с таким объемом 😱
Мы его на объемах тестировали, конечно, но не на таких. Программисты этим вопросом уже занимаются!
К завтрашнему обеду/вечеру наплыв спадет и он будет работать в штатном режиме.
Попробуйте завтра! Я напишу ❤️
Собственно, вот мои впечатления сразу после съемок 5 ноября - делилась в своем лайф-канале. Прикрепляю скрины.
Как видите, чуйка меня не подвела :) Я из-за этого всю неделю сильно переживала, и, как теперь видно, не зря.
Ну а касательно "моей" астрологии: она правда заметно отличается от привычной инстаграмной. Мне не кажется хоть сколько-нибудь полезным программировать клиентов/читателей на "брак будет в 2028, в 2…
❤162💯33❤🔥22😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @SmartAstro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@SmartAstro edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @SmartAstro as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос к новеньким. У вас изменилось отношение к астрологии благодаря моему блогу?
Да, раньше не верил(а). Теперь это кажется любопытным и заслуживающим внимания.22%
Нет, и до тебя верил(а)21%
К астрологии нет, но рассуждаешь на многие темы интересно, поэтому читаю.35%
Я старенький и давно в твоей секте 😁22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что по звездам, Ален?” (@SmartAstro), 22,587 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SmartAstro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.