9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,783–14,861 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 17:44
14,792
-1
11 Aug 2026, 20:01
14,793
-19
10 Aug 2026, 22:45
14,812
-5
10 Aug 2026, 01:03
14,817
-3
8 Aug 2026, 23:51
14,820
-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:55
14,823
-17
7 Aug 2026, 00:53
14,840
-12
6 Aug 2026, 02:21
14,852
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:35
14,852
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.0%
avg views ÷ 14,792 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,670
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
65 (28 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
173,441
Reactions total
11,627
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,230
Videos
≈127
Links
≈586
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,898 reactions across 61 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,357
58.3%
🔥
2,067
19.0%
💯
1,060
9.73%
❤🔥
917
8.41%
😱
305
2.80%
🤬
192
1.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,627reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот карта объявления войны.
Это эксперимент, поэтому слишком серьезно к нему не относитесь. Мне просто любопытно стало, насколько карта показательна и можно ли будет по ней сделать какие-то выводы.
Путин начал выступление в 05:30 по мск. Объявил о начале войны через 20 минут 25 секунд. Поэтому я строила карту на 24 февраля 2022 года, 05:50:25, Москва.
Думаю, карту можно рассматривать так:
- первый дом - это Росси…
Как уже писала, мне очень похоже, что ему подбирают важные даты.
Посмотрите скрин - это карта первой инаугурации.
Я не верю, что в 10м доме мог случайно возникнуть такой стеллиум (к тому же в максимально устойчивом знаке - в Тельце!). Там же, в 10м доме, управитель всего гороскопа. Плюс МС в Овне при гармоничном управителе. И асц во Льве. Не верю. Карта выглядит так, будто ее подбирали.
Так что я не удивлена, что …
Путин максимально удалился от солнечного затмения
Насколько позволила протяженность России
12 августа тень Луны легла на Землю полной полосой — и один из немногих участков суши на её пути прошёл через Россию, через безлюдный северо-восток Таймыра, где день на несколько минут превратился в ночь. Явление редкое: континентальная Европа не видела полного затмения с 1999 года, и повторится оно теперь очень нескоро в 207…
Смотрели/читали мои астро-уроки? Помните, что я рассказывала про принцип подобия, на котором базируется астрология?
Если смотреть на затмение через призму принципа подобия, то, во-первых, можно лучше понять саму идею этого принципа и символических пересечений космоса и жизни, а во-вторых - ощутить суть той самой «судьбоносности», которой обычно пугают астрологи в коридоры затмений.
Еще раз скажу, что я первый раз н…
В Валенсии, где я живу, только что было полное солнечное затмение.
Не планировала его смотреть, тк у меня рано утром самолет. Но вышла в аптеку и случайно застала.
Так вот. В какой-то момент резко потемнело и на минуту наступила ночь. А через пять минут вернулся день. Магия!
Жутковато и необычно. Очень впечатлилась, хотя ожиданий было ноль.
В следующем году будет «затмение века» - самое длинное с 1991 по 2114. Ма…
Пишут, что женился Криштиану Роналду.
1) Делаем прогноз в СмартАстре на его данные рождения
2) Видим сразу три указания на вероятность брака и перемен в отношениях.
3) Смотрим прогноз по затмениям, включая бесплатные списки
4) Видим и там указания на включение темы партнерства и семьи в этом году
5) Восхищаемся астрологией и идем заказывать себе годовой прогноз* и прогноз по затмениям на 7 лет вперед 😁
* Годовой - …
Итак, анонсирую! Обещанный индивидуальный прогноз по затмениям на 7 лет вперед.
Что вы узнаете, заказав этот разбор:
1) На какую сферу вашей жизни будет влиять каждое из затмений на 7 лет вперед. Их в году минимум четыре.
2) Какие затмения могут стать для вас судьбоносными и включить важные точки вашего гороскопа. Это будет не каждый год, но если будет, то затмение становится максимально значимым - оно запускает в…
Хотя ладно. Один пост и топаю спать. Утром прочитаю - очень интересно!
Долгое время в этом канале я писала только всякую астро-попсу, изредка комментируя политику (она раньше давала очень много отписок и хейта). Поэтому все политическое выносила в личный канал "о жизни", где молчать о происходящем не могла. Тут я окончательно распоясалась всего лишь полтора года назад.
Так вот.
В личном неастро канале я периодичес…
Милые мои, я не готова брать на себя ответственность и говорить вам, куда ехать, как спасать свои деньги и все такое.
Могу только сказать, что вопреки прогнозам прокремлевских астрологов я не вижу ни падения Европы, ни падения США, ни падения вражеского доллара/евро и тд по списку. Как и не вижу никакого будущего величия и "вставания с колен" России.
Наоборот, главную проблему России я вижу именно в противопоставл…
И вот если соединить оба фактора - слабый Сатурн и отсутствие тройного прохода - то нынешний цикл действительно начинает гораздо сильнее напоминать 1917, чем 1953, с которым я сравнивала его раньше.
Не событиями буквально. Я говорю о характере процесса.
В 1953 и 1989 переход оказался многоступенчатым. У системы было время несколько раз перестроиться по ходу движения.
В 1917 все произошло гораздо концентрированнее:…
❤327❤🔥39🔥36😱11💯6
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @SmartAstro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос к новеньким. У вас изменилось отношение к астрологии благодаря моему блогу?
Да, раньше не верил(а). Теперь это кажется любопытным и заслуживающим внимания.23%
Нет, и до тебя верил(а)21%
К астрологии нет, но рассуждаешь на многие темы интересно, поэтому читаю.35%
Я старенький и давно в твоей секте 😁22%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 611,164 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что по звездам, Ален?” (@SmartAstro), 14,792 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SmartAstro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.