Channel
@Skrltt404
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
372subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002180911553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Skrltt404 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Skrltt404 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 372 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 372 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
940 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 244 | 26.0% | |
| custom 5212956395913117186 | 144 | 15.3% | |
| custom 5220174917382742964 | 97 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5332804632219521437 | 90 | 9.57% | |
| custom 5366071236986178267 | 85 | 9.04% | |
| 🔥 | 81 | 8.62% | |
| 🍌 | 60 | 6.38% | |
| 🍓 | 54 | 5.74% | |
| custom 5255830610592697943 | 21 | 2.23% | |
| custom 5219912185643310342 | 17 | 1.81% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 1.38% | |
| ✍ | 9 | 0.957% | |
| custom 5220117798612673005 | 6 | 0.638% | |
| custom 5255735017505589557 | 6 | 0.638% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 0.426% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.426% | |
| custom 5222324720313076425 | 3 | 0.319% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.213% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 940reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Skrltt404. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 March 2026 to 23 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Скажу коротко: я хочу отсеять неактивную аудиторию, чтобы больше не было к самой себе вопросов типа "подписчиков много, но почему отдача такая?" Никого не обвиняю если что, эт чисто мои загоны 🤩 https://t.me/en0cent https://t.me/en0cent https://t.me/en0cent Кто хочет следить за мной дальше - переходите. Этот канал останется архивом. Отдельное спасибо тем, кто поддерживает меня до сих пор, я это очень ценю. Всех люб…
❤11🍌1🥰1
Channel name was changed to «ПеРЕезД оаоэ,,😳 Sk4r»
На полноценки не тянет меня пока
custom 522017491738274296450❤23🔥12🍌2🍓1
That's my wife👅👅👅
❤18
🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈 🤩Гифтик для любим0к из хакмонблога (М3ня п0дкупили пачк0й чипс0в.....) #арт #полноценка
🍓23❤7🔥3custom 52201177986126730051custom 52201749173827429641
Графомания какая-то 🤩🤩🤩 #Черкаш
🍌39🍓20⚡11custom 52199121856433103425❤3custom 52201749173827429643custom 52201177986126730052
Щпшные скетчи Не теряйте меня я в томодачи задрочу
custom 522017491738274296443❤10🔥9🥰3custom 52557350175055895573🍌1🍓1custom 52199121856433103421
Олды вспомнят (и заплачут) что у меня была своя вселенная да Директор К. ma goat
🔥36custom 521991218564331034210🍌6❤3custom 52223247203130764252
ВН3ЗАПНЫЙ СК3ТЧ3ВЫЙ ГИФТИК ЖЕНЕ👅👅 Б3з норм лайна, б3з с0блюдения мелких д3тал3й...ч3т я с0вс3м 0бл3нилась. Ск0ро защищать пр03кт, так чт0 п0лноценки воз0бновятся, ч3стн
🔥15🍌3custom 52557350175055895573❤1custom 52199121856433103421
Тамб Хитклифф when? 🤩🤩🤩 #Черкаш #лимбус
custom 533280463221952143773custom 536607123698617826731custom 521295639591311718622❤6🍌4🍓3🔥3custom 52201177986126730053
Еще редрав короче Цюхенги канон
❤42custom 536607123698617826717✍9custom 52129563959131171866🍌1💘1
Редрав авы для блога спустя пять месяцев 😛 По проекту у меня тоже пять кста)) 🤩🤩🤩 #Черкаш Воаа звездочки😲😲
❤57custom 521295639591311718626custom 536607123698617826715🍓3⚡2🍌2💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Skrltt404. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 994,585 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПеРЕезД оаоэ,,😳 Sk4r” (@Skrltt404), 372 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Skrltt404.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.