Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for - 𝑱𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝑯𝒐𝒅𝒐𝟐 .

Channel

- 𝑱𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝑯𝒐𝒅𝒐𝟐 .

@Skoon_5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

695subscribers

+61 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002739891383
TypeChannel
Username@Skoon_5
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Skoon_5

Growth

634695664.57 August 2026 — 634 subscribers8 August 2026 — 637 subscribers8 August 2026 — 637 subscribers15 August 2026 — 695 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 625–704 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:42695+58
8 Aug 2026, 02:49637no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:22637+3
7 Aug 2026, 13:47634first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
190.5%
avg views ÷ 695 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total15,886
Reactions total753
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,325 reactions across 20 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.17% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5938417621073402089957.17%
custom 5832400729943316348705.28%
custom 5938111974020750783685.13%
custom 5938212265802079654634.75%
custom 5318839816639497406513.85%
custom 6003654317419008060493.70%
custom 5307729097022004760453.40%
custom 6008263573241862879443.32%
custom 5307943252681308039423.17%
custom 5195436352434366652413.09%
custom 5832196822075969776413.09%
custom 6005577925896708403392.94%
custom 5940320935830624811382.87%
custom 5983525699783237099362.72%
custom 5318834654088808198352.64%
custom 5834906839065564551332.49%
custom 5238134761217617581322.42%
custom 5319054861357042437292.19%
custom 5893484003935131458292.19%
custom 5445096582238181549282.11%
31 further kinds41731.5%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,325reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Skoon_5. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC29 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

' رغم لخبطة الوضع ، وعدم إتزان ڪتير من الأمور بس الواحد أمله في ربنا ان بڪره هيڪون أفضل ، مش بالمقاييس المنطقية ، ولا بحسابات العقل ، لڪن برحمته ، وبإنه عالم بالنية وشايف المجهود ، حُسن الظن فـ ڪرم ربنا وبغض النظر عن الظروف المحيطة ولڪن هو إللي بيخلي القلوب أقوى ، متحملة ، ومڪملة 💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕🦋 ›

💘4❤‍🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC364 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

- 𝑂𝑛𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑦 🤍🤍🤍🤍✨.

custom 523813476121761758132custom 519543635243436665216custom 580105146729707123014custom 61320645194903766198

1 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,920 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026

- يومًا مأ سَنڪون فۍ مڪاننا الصَحيح مُطمئنين، أمنين بجوار من نحب نفعل الاشياء خاصتنا سويًا بحُب نتشارك الضحڪات سوًيا ❤️❤️❤️❤️✨›

custom 586626523710725289122custom 586386124942240094115custom 582117649863515278313custom 542700846491003737711

31 Jul 2026, 20:11 UTC407 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026

〃إللي عـامل/ة ( Mute ) يااريـت يشـيلو ، و تـقديراً للمجـهود إللي بـنقدمـه هنـاا في الاتشـاانل ، أعملو ريأڪـتات ڪتير علي الـبوسـتات وشجـعوونا أننا ننزل محتوى لطيف شبهڪو ڪده يـٰ مڪسرات🌟💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗🎀⤹.

custom 589348400393513145829custom 580562305625673816217custom 580768088246243217412custom 54270084649100373772

30 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC≈1,910 views68 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝑂𝑛𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑦 💍🤍🤍🤍.

custom 583240072994331634833custom 600557792589670840317custom 600799470399416592116custom 58662652371072528912

29 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC962 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026

- من ألطف الأمور التي يمكن أن تحدث لأي شخص أن يجد من يدعمه نفسيًا ، سواء بكلامه أو بأفعاله ، أن يجد من يسانده دائمًا ، من لا يمل منه ويستمع إليه دائمًا ، أن يجد من يُهوِّن عليه صعوبة الأيام حتى ولو بأبسط الأشياء ، أن يجد من يفهمه دون أن يتكلم .. الدعم النفسي في الأوقات الصعبة لا يُنسى ، لا يُنسى أبدًا 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰❤️ >>> .

custom 544509658223818154928custom 600365431741900806017custom 519543635243436665215custom 58211764986351527832

28 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC≈1,410 views68 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

- لا تنتظر الظروفَ المناسبة، بل أصنعها.💛💛.

custom 590431421494356243528custom 590449562147724355720custom 590215127370826490419custom 54270084649100373771

27 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,690 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الزعل علاجه الحنية ، يعني تخيّل ڪدا يبقى في زعل ومُشڪلة بينك وبين شخص ما وبعد شوية تلاقي الشخص دا بيقول لك : حقك عليا ماتزعلش ، أو يبعت مسدج ينڪشك فيها عشان مش هاين عليه تبقوا زعلانين من بعض ، وعمومًا أي تصرُّف فيه حنية ولُطف بيسكّن الألم وبيداوي الجروح مهما ڪان حجم الزعل❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️𐦍 ׄ ִ⋆ֶָ֢

custom 531883981663949740633custom 530772909702200476016custom 593811197402075078315custom 58211764986351527831

25 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC≈2,690 views67 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

- انا كنت محتاج الي يسمع تفاصيلي الصغيرة قبل الكبيره. = ولقتيه؟ - اه، لقيتك! ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️✨

custom 593811197402075078333custom 531883981663949740618custom 530772909702200476015custom 58211764986351527831

22 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC991 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

- 𝑺𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒅𝒂𝒚 , 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤩🤩› .

custom 530794325268130803942custom 600557792589670840322custom 594032355146570845911

22 Jul 2026, 00:33 UTC853 views70 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

- الريأڪت يحَبايبي خلو شڪل التشانل لطيف شبه وجودكم 🤎🤎🤎🤎✨'''.

custom 593841762107340208934custom 593821226580207965420custom 587502327242424851315custom 61320645194903766191

20 Jul 2026, 05:08 UTC≈1,660 views82 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

- أنا وحَبيبي وتَالتِنا السَعادة ❤️❤️❤️❤️✨ .

custom 594032093583062481138custom 583240072994331634823custom 593811197402075078320custom 58211764986351527831

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Skoon_5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 189,613 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“- 𝑱𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝑯𝒐𝒅𝒐𝟐 .” (@Skoon_5), 695 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Skoon_5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.