"فإن الله تبارك وتعالى لا يَتكرَّم عليه أحد وهو أكرم الاكرمين، فمن ترك لوجهه أمراً أو فعلَه لوجهه بذل الله له أضعاف ما تركه من ذلك الامر أضعافاً مضاعفة، وجازاه بأضعاف ما فعله لأجله أضعافاً مضاعفة، فلما أمر إبراهيم بذبح ولده ؛ فبادر لأمر الله، ووافق عليه الولد أباه رضاءً منهما وتسليماً، وعلم الله منهما الصدق والوفاء فداه بذبح عظيم، وأعطاهما ما أعطاهما من فضله، وكان من بعض عطاياه أن بارك في ذريتهما حتى ملؤا الأرض، وجعل…

Channel
اجلس بنا نؤمن ساعة 🕋
@SitBelieveanHour
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,289subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001953460921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SitBelieveanHour |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SitBelieveanHour |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 1,289 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 1,287 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 1,290 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 1,292 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 1,292 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 1,293 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.45%
- avg views ÷ 1,289 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 122
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (30 April 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 487 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 19s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
سباعية الذكر الرائعة الرائعة: المذكور واحد لكن الذكر مختلف، وما بين درجات الذاكرين تفاوت وتباين كما بين السماء والأرض، فكيف يصل الذاكر إلى أعلى الدرجات ويسبق غيره إلى أسماها؟! قال ابن الجوزي في كلام عُجِن لفظه بمسك معانيه ففاح نسيمه وعبق عبيره حتى تعلق به الرواة وسارت به الركبان: " أول ما يحتاج إليه العازم على ذكر الله: التفرغ من الشواغل الظاهرة، ثم تسكين جوارح البدن عن الحركات الشاغلة، ثم قطع الفكر عن قلبه، ثم إش…
ج- قطع الفكر عن قلبه: والمقصود به تهيؤ القلب -والقلب أولا وقبل كل شيء- قبل الدخول على من يطلع على السرائر والأفئدة، فتستحي أن تدخل عليه وقلبك مشغول مع غيره، أو تنطق بكلمات الثناء عليه وقلبك يثني على سواه، أو تتعوَّذ خوفا من عذابه وقلبك خائف من عباده، أو تحمده وتشكره بلسانك والقلب جاحد ناكر لا يأمر الجوارح بشكر أو معروف. ولقطع الفكر الدنيوي عن القلب طريقتان ذكرهما ابن القيم فاسمع كلماته دواء ناجعا شافيا معافيا وكأنه…
ز- التحفظ بالحالة التي استفادها قلبه: وذلك بصيانة النفس بعد مجالس الذِّكر عن الوقوع في الحرام، والإغراق في اللهو، والإسراف في المباح، وحتى في حالات عدم الذكر عليك استحضار نية التقوي بالمباح على ذكرالله وطاعته، حتى يحين موعد الذكر القادم، فيكون حال روحك إما أن تتصل أو تتهيأ كي تتصل.
قال ذو النون: طوبى لمن أنصف ربه عز وجل. قيل: وكيف يُنصِف ربه؟ قال: " يُقِرُّ له بالآفات في طاعته، وبالجهل في معصيته، وإن آخذه بذنوبه رأى عدله، وإن غفر له رأى فضله، وإن لم يتقبل منه حسناته لم يره ظالما لما معه من الآفات، وإن قبلها رأى إحسانه لما جاد به من الكرامات ".
قال ابن القيِّم محصيا أنواع الجود: " و الجود عشر مراتب: أحدها: الجود بالنفس وهو أعلى مراتبه كما قال الشاعر: يجود بالنفس إذ ضنَّ البخيل بها والجود بالنفس أقصى غاية الجود الثانية: الجود بالرياسة، وهو ثاني مراتب الجود، فيحمل الجواد جوده على امتهان رياسته والجود بها، والإيثار في قضاء حاجات الملتمس. الثالثة: الجود براحته ورفاهيته وإجمام نفسه فيجود بها تعبا وكدا في مصلحة غيره، ومن هذا جود الإنسان بنومه ولذته لمسامره ؛…
" تباركَ عيدُكُمْ أحبابَ قلبي وأشرقَ بالسعادةِ والمسَرَّة أيا من يستمرُّ العيدُ فيكم طوالَ العامِ، لا في العامِ مرَّة " 🫶❤️
File, posted without a caption
سبحان الله اسمع الريكورد ده هتحافظ على ذكر من أهم أذكار الصباح أقل من أربع دقائق تأمّلتُ عجَباً 👇 https://t.me/SitBelieveanHour/1878
. مناجاة المحسنين في الخلوات .
File, posted without a caption
https://youtu.be/i48T7OQX_j8
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SitBelieveanHour. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اجلس بنا نؤمن ساعة 🕋” (@SitBelieveanHour), 1,289 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SitBelieveanHour.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.