Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Сильвено Гнездо🌴

@SiLvaNirSSS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

224subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002685706521
TypeChannel
Username@SiLvaNirSSS
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SiLvaNirSSS

Growth

223224223.59 Aug 2026, 20:17 — 223 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 10:35 — 224 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 20:1710 Aug 2026, 10:35
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 223–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:35224+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:17223first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
118.4%
avg views ÷ 224 subscribers
Avg views / post
265
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
33.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,386
Reactions total801
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

801 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534142949348557451425131.3%
custom 532155008703217849720025.0%
custom 52693583788905997319612.0%
custom 5294089182833040513739.11%
custom 5445192209685059117658.11%
custom 5238012221505691014364.49%
🍾273.37%
custom 5377635410660840969263.25%
custom 5231047730171764336222.75%
👀30.375%
🖕20.25%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 801reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 9 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SiLvaNirSSS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC129 views96 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Тактак вспоминаем быстробыстро про свой Гиперфикс детства. Пересматриваю АвМ уже 10+ раз, у меня плывёт мозг ЫЫЫЫ АХАХА СТИКМЕНЫ🥺 #AvM

custom 534142949348557451441custom 526935837889059973123custom 532155008703217849718custom 53776354106608409695custom 52380122215056910143👀2custom 52310477301717643362custom 52940891828330405132

5 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC167 views94 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

ЕХЕЕ, Янеллкк начиркал двух моих сопливых персонажей. Спасибо бро, это прекрасно🥹(За беременного отдельный респект) Крутой Лев Тигр➡️ https://t.me/Yanelka_33

custom 534142949348557451437custom 529408918283304051328custom 532155008703217849720custom 52310477301717643366custom 52380122215056910142custom 54451922096850591171

2 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC249 views93 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026

Шо творица йомайо =0 Меньше чем за месяц пришла ещё сотня, это лето меня очень радуетт. Хочу ещё раз поблагодарить вообще каждого😌!! (Во-во и тебя тоже, да-да.) Ещё по секрету скажу, что теперь рисую коммишки через один хороший и новоиспечённый проект. Тот открылся буквально недавно, очень хочу поддержать его. (+ как и сказала, Я там тоже есть, так что ну..ухуу..дада.🥺) ⤵️ https://t.me/yourart3000

custom 534142949348557451437🍾27custom 532155008703217849716custom 52940891828330405135custom 52310477301717643363custom 52380122215056910142custom 53776354106608409692custom 54451922096850591171

30 Jul 2026, 11:07 UTC329 views111 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ееее теперь у меня есть новый друн, Он сделан из какой-то параши и дешёвой глины. Отвалились все лапы, пришлось принудительно клеить обратно, но вышло нот бэд. Хочу ему друна сделать ещё одного хзхз

custom 534142949348557451451custom 532155008703217849731custom 544519220968505911718custom 52310477301717643363custom 52940891828330405133custom 53776354106608409693custom 52380122215056910142

28 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC366 views107 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Маленький сладенький малышочек Выстрелить с винтовки - ❤️

custom 532155008703217849752custom 529408918283304051327custom 534142949348557451420🖕2custom 52310477301717643362custom 52693583788905997312custom 53776354106608409692

27 Jul 2026, 22:39 UTC301 views86 reactions4 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Никогда не рисовала рыцарей, такой серьёзный дядька вщ А Зелёный кстате теперь не только в лаптях, но и в крутой шляпе. У меня в робуксе такая есть💥

custom 532155008703217849745custom 523801222150569101417custom 537763541066084096912custom 52310477301717643364custom 52940891828330405133custom 54451922096850591173custom 53414294934855745142

27 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC297 views85 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ахахах Вкусный Эйвери в тапках смешно удаляй

custom 526935837889059973144custom 532155008703217849716custom 534142949348557451413custom 52940891828330405134custom 54451922096850591174custom 52380122215056910142custom 53776354106608409692

25 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC306 views67 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Воо, Недавно перерыла галерею на стареньких мобилах, и нашла Артефакты с старой Сонарией. У меня всего фотки 4, а остальное мне докинули, Капец жалею что сама ничего не фотала. Скринам примерно 3 года, может даже больше. Помимо игры остались и рисунки, но там очень стыдная херня (Слизнекотеке тоже есть😎) #CoS

custom 544519220968505911738custom 534142949348557451415custom 526935837889059973112custom 52380122215056910142

25 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC242 views62 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

———————————— Никогда фоны не рисую, но раз в год и палка стреляет😛 Йщо У мя резкое желание подшарить за проекты или Арг по Майнкрафту. Ааа Херабрин нет страшна отстань бл#н Наф#к #CoS

custom 534142949348557451435custom 526935837889059973115custom 52380122215056910146custom 52310477301717643362custom 53215500870321784972👀1custom 52940891828330405131

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @SiLvaNirSSS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 95,335 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сильвено Гнездо🌴” (@SiLvaNirSSS), 224 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SiLvaNirSSS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.